warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:34 pm
Is it true that warlock debuffs @ lvl 90, become obselete when the enemy has the last holyword?
Silkroad Online Forums
Free Forums for Silkroad Online players.
https://dev.silkroadforums.com/
warlock vs Holy Word
Page 1 of 1
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:35 pm
Not all of em.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:57 pm
It's against the rules to post on behalf of a banned member, right? 
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:01 pm
tedtwilliger wrote:It's against the rules to post on behalf of a banned member, right?
Well that's bullshit if it's true.
And not all indeed.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:07 pm
How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should never have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.
Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.
If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD
Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.
If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:14 pm
ted go die
Edit anyone care to give a decent answer?
Edit anyone care to give a decent answer?
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:16 pm
tedtwilliger wrote:How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should [b[never[/b] have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.
Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.
If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD
True, you're right...My bad.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:20 pm
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:26 pm
Two flames in one thread, congratulations.
Enjoy that ban of yours.
Enjoy that ban of yours.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:02 pm
Cases:
User: NoWhere2hide
Ban Pending.
-----------------------------
Thank you for the report.
- 1 Count of posting for a banned member
2 counts of flaming
User: NoWhere2hide
Ban Pending.
-----------------------------
Thank you for the report.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:07 pm
Barotix wrote:Cases:1 Count of posting for a banned member
3 strike&GD "Zero Tolerance" rules apply
2 counts of flaming
User: NoWhere2hide
Ban Pending.
-----------------------------
Thank you for the report.
Don't forget viewtopic.php?f=8&t=96569
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:07 pm
And the system works.
( sorry for the "heated" nature of that report barotix )
( sorry for the "heated" nature of that report barotix )
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:29 pm
errr care much ,
Ted your like one of those kids that runs to mummy, "mummmmm bla bla has pissed his pants"
@ admins, least this time u banned me properly, unlike last time.
oh just notice....Ban Count=1 LOL
bye 4 now
,Ted your like one of those kids that runs to mummy, "mummmmm bla bla has pissed his pants"
@ admins, least this time u banned me properly, unlike last time.
oh just notice....Ban Count=1 LOL
bye 4 now
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:35 pm
NoWhere2hide2nd wrote:errr care much
Ted your like one of those kids that runs to mummy, "mummmmm bla bla has pissed his pants"
@ admins, least this time u banned me properly, unlike last time.
oh just notice....Ban Count=1 LOL
bye 4 now
Banning is literally 1 click away. It takes no time at all.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:37 am
seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?
and naughty cin!
and naughty cin!
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:41 am
crazyskwrls wrote:seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?
and naughty cin!
His original post said, "Posting for Deacon." He edited it before I could lock it and prevent editing.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:03 am
I think that bleed still works not 100% sure, but i only use decay and dark decayed when someone has holy word on so i dunno
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:06 am
No, not all debuffs are useless at 90, not sure which ones still apply tho, ask Fug-Dug (SP?) his life is warlocks lol.
Off Topic - Leave Ted alone, he is just trying to clean up these forums, if people keep posting for banned members the actual ban would become useless.
Off Topic - Leave Ted alone, he is just trying to clean up these forums, if people keep posting for banned members the actual ban would become useless.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:15 am
i beg to differ...
miss deacon, but then again this is not OTL....
miss deacon, but then again this is not OTL....
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:26 am
NoWhere2hide wrote:Is it true that warlock debuffs @ lvl 90, become obselete when the enemy has the last holyword?
Panic and Bleed still work. And Stun, of course.
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:32 am
Barotix wrote:crazyskwrls wrote:seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?
and naughty cin!
His original post said, "Posting for Deacon." He edited it before I could lock it and prevent editing.
i lold
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:48 am
tedtwilliger wrote:How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should never have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.
Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.
If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD
Ted, only for you:)
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warrio ... tenazi.htm
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:39 pm
Hai Hideyyy
Come back to sro plz lol
Come back to sro plz lol
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:32 pm
Remember that u can always use disease first..which increases the curse lvl by 1..
Re: warlock vs Holy Word
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:27 pm
Redd wrote:Remember that u can always use disease first..which increases the curse lvl by 1..
That's actually a misconception
Of course Disease still works at a certain probability assuming both Holy Spell and Vampire Touch/Kiss are maxed out, but that's only because Disease is always one level ahead of Holy Spell (10D with maxed Vampire skills VS. 9D Holy Spell prevention). Disease's only effect is to increase the probability of debuffs to near 100%. But even with 10D Disease on top of 9D Holy Spell, Holy Spell will prevent all debuffs except bleed and panic.