Page 1 of 1

2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:53 am
by redhunter12
what is better in pvp?

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:59 am
by Jaapii
2h.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:10 pm
by Mameluke
2h less defense but more dmg, 1h less dmg bur more defense

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:12 pm
by JoshPoshMosh
shield trash will drive you to the point of insanity

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:19 pm
by welcomes
With 2h warriors same as my lvl, i could of beaten them in all pvps i had, with my 1h. But i didnt reach the level to see how the DD will be against me in pvp.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:29 pm
by MissLe2
for offense 2h, for defense 1h

for party play with wizard, rogue, nukers, in party 1h
for anything else 2h

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:34 pm
by AkillerNXC
Farm both. You'll need them both to be effective at pvp.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:37 pm
by Priam
2h, obviously.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:39 pm
by Nitro
2h without 1h is weak ... and opposite.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:04 pm
by chesticles
it depends on your sub.

1h will own in pvp with warlock sub

2h is good in pvp without a sub but is even better with cleric sub.

So if its just straight 1h vs 2h then 2h is better but 1h with warlock sub is very good.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:05 pm
by billabong_
yeah 2h for pvp. but never 2h in party play.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:10 pm
by chesticles
billabong_ wrote:yeah 2h for pvp. but never 2h in party play.


Why not? I am 2h and i can tank fine. A warrior is a warrior. Just throw on vital and start agrro and drag.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:14 pm
by the_wicked
get both.
In order to tank out a snowshielded INT you're going to need the shield + knockback.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:14 pm
by BlackFox898
2h
edit: should have made a poll for this.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:46 pm
by magisuns
both? axes are helpful for getting bleed too u know :P

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:50 pm
by _Creep_
I like 2hand more but but in pvp 1hand is also great, maybe even better. Bets pvp build 1hand warlock and you pwn all for shure.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:23 pm
by JKMB
as a nuker 1h give me the most trouble, I can three skill a 2h/cleric w/o his skins, 1h can tank me out pretty well, and if use bind on me, then there atks hurt ALOT.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:16 am
by Shadowfox542
Im 2h/1h celric, its an amazing build, but requires a ton of sp. Ive found that against euros i use 1h, and for chinese I generally through up a skin then 2H. You need both. 2H, youll get wrecked by ints, even with mana skin, if they snow your done. 1H, you can tank untill snow is out for ints, then kill them, but againest most chinese STR, it will be a pot war untill they pull off a giant crit.

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:19 am
by thechampion80
dual axe :D
jk

it would be best to get both because sometimes you need that extra defense+knockback

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:27 am
by Tyrese
Get dual axe, 2h and 1h. start with dual axe for bleed then use 2h to start killing. when bless/skins off = 1h

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:18 am
by BananaShake
3h pwns all :arrow:

Re: 2h or 1h

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:08 pm
by chesticles
BananaShake wrote:3h pwns all :arrow:


OMG yea how could we forget 3h yea go 3h it owns.

Although i heard fists are the best. Lighting + division + weaken + bleed + punch = ownage you should try it

lol