Page 1 of 1

Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:04 pm
by CloudStrider
Hey all,

I was originally going to cSRO but I have friends on iSRO.

Some servers have low traffic but I heard if JM stops banning they will all be full.

Will JM keep banning?

Thanks.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:06 pm
by subzero
they should

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:07 pm
by Norain_
Ok why do u ask SRF? This site isnt associated with Joymax so we simply cant know...

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:08 pm
by CloudStrider
Norain_ wrote:Ok why do u ask SRF? This site isnt associated with Joymax so we simply cant know...


I'm Sorry.

You guys just seem to know more about SRO then The actual SRO forum.

Lock if needed.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:13 pm
by Doctor_MOS
CloudStrider wrote:
Norain_ wrote:Ok why do u ask SRF? This site isnt associated with Joymax so we simply cant know...


I'm Sorry.

You guys just seem to know more about SRO then The actual SRO forum.

Lock if needed.

LOL Joymax ftw!

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:17 pm
by CloudStrider
Doctor_MOS wrote:
CloudStrider wrote:
Norain_ wrote:Ok why do u ask SRF? This site isnt associated with Joymax so we simply cant know...


I'm Sorry.

You guys just seem to know more about SRO then The actual SRO forum.

Lock if needed.

LOL Joymax ftw!


Lol, what enthusiasm.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:23 pm
by ping_lo
Those who study history see 2 things. Joymax has never in their history sustained a banning trend. And Joymax never really bans the problem accounts. They instead waste time and energy banning gold bots that will be replaced the next day or a random innocent player. If you had a list of names on a dart board you could probably be more accurate banning the names under where your dart lands.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:25 pm
by CloudStrider
ping_lo wrote:Those who study history see 2 things. Joymax has never in their history sustained a banning trend. And Joymax never really bans the problem accounts. They instead waste time and energy banning gold bots that will be replaced the next day or a random innocent player. If you had a list of names on a dart board you could probably be more accurate banning the names under where your dart lands.


Okay Thank You,

Might have to try again to convince my friends cSRO is the way to go.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:38 pm
by Norain_
CloudStrider wrote:
ping_lo wrote:Those who study history see 2 things. Joymax has never in their history sustained a banning trend. And Joymax never really bans the problem accounts. They instead waste time and energy banning gold bots that will be replaced the next day or a random innocent player. If you had a list of names on a dart board you could probably be more accurate banning the names under where your dart lands.


Okay Thank You,

Might have to try again to convince my friends cSRO is the way to go.

I think cSRO is better to... Have fun in cSRO if you going there :)

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:39 pm
by chesticles
yea there new thing is weekly gold bot bans and random non silk buyers.

Keeps the traffic low at nite ^_^

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:52 pm
by CHIPS
IDK, but I hope so. Let's just say that the worst days where players only have a 2 hour window to log into the game is over (yes the server was full 22/24 hours at one point). This is one reason why I returned to this game.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:14 pm
by CloudStrider
CHIPS wrote:IDK, but I hope so. Let's just say that the worst days where players only have a 2 hour window to log into the game is over (yes the server was full 22/24 hours at one point). This is one reason why I returned to this game.


Yeah, same, this was a major factor when I started researching SRO again.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:14 am
by Krysis
i bloody hope so.

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:06 pm
by DontHackMePl0x
Nope don't count on it.
My guess its due to Age of Conan, so i don't think the clientless goldbot bans will last that long.
Besides, their missing way to much money from people not buying prems since there is no need for it now. When their gonna check their financial records they'll prolly instantanly stop with the bans :roll:

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:20 pm
by Swindler
DontHackMePl0x wrote:Nope don't count on it.
My guess its due to Age of Conan, so i don't think the clientless goldbot bans will last that long.
Besides, their missing way to much money from people not buying prems since there is no need for it now. When their gonna check their financial records they'll prolly instantanly stop with the bans :roll:

+1

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:50 pm
by HolyPure
CHIPS wrote:IDK, but I hope so. Let's just say that the worst days where players only have a 2 hour window to log into the game is over (yes the server was full 22/24 hours at one point). This is one reason why I returned to this game.



OT: i like ppl like u, who do 1-2 lines and the sign is like

---------
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BIG !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------

size is all that matters ? :X

Re: Will JM Continue Banning?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:01 pm
by sparta_sword
DontHackMePl0x wrote:Nope don't count on it.
My guess its due to Age of Conan, so i don't think the clientless goldbot bans will last that long.
Besides, their missing way to much money from people not buying prems since there is no need for it now. When their gonna check their financial records they'll prolly instantanly stop with the bans :roll:

for one they are doing it do promote Silkroad, so the Age of Conan you are half right on, they just want to get their game out there, they don't need to look at their financial records, they know exactly what their doing it's just basic business