Silkroad Online Forums

城战规则修改的意见调查


经过两次城战的观察，由于韩方开发上缺乏平衡性，导致现在的要塞易守难攻，使得多数服务器发生了无法攻下要塞的现象，一定程度上影响了攻城方玩家的热情。我们已经将情况反映给韩方，要求开发商迅速进行平衡性修改，但是鉴于平衡性修改是重大改动，因此需要一定的时间。

　　在此之前，为了暂时平衡攻守，使城战不失去意义，我们准备对城战规则进行修改如下：

* 每次城战开始前，清空要塞的所有者情况，使要塞变成空城，所有战盟均成为攻城方
* 城战开始后，所有战盟在公平的情况下攻打空城--长安要塞
* 城战结束后，获胜方可占有长安要塞直至下一次城战开始
* 每次城战前，上一次获胜方两周内的税收不受影响，但城内建设会恢复城最初状态
　　
　　这些修改仅为临时策略，正式的城战平衡性修改还要等待韩方的策略。就此征求广大参与城战的玩家的意见，请进行投票。

MissLe2 wrote:as a suggestion (just to talk here)
all attacking guilds should not be considered as enemies untill heart is reached

BakaFish wrote:My union attacked and succeeded to win the fortress from SlayerS.

CHIPS wrote:FW is pretty new, even for the Korean servers. So I am sure many adjustments will come in the future. But yes right now, it is very unfair for the siegers.

One thing that make FW very easy for the defenders is that, they can shoot and nuke even if they are behind the wall. For example, character A is a defending nuker on the top, and character B is an attacking nuker below.

|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B

The FW is designed so that, A can nuke B though the wall, while B cannot nuke A back. B can only nuke A if A stands at position C. But why would A stand at position C when he can nuke B just fine at position A? This is not only unfair, it is unrealistic. In real life, A does need to stand at C to hit B. I would much rather if players on the top of the wall gets a free 20% damage taken reduction, than they having the ability to shoot siegers below with no worries.

And I really do not like the idea of door repairing. How exactly do you repair the door in the middle of a siege? I mean, the damage to the door is done on the other side, so how can you repair it? It would make sense if the fortress controlling guild can pay money to upgrade their doors, so it have more hp initially. But once the siege starts, the door cannot be repaired at all.

And I also do not like how the fences are working now. Right now, one can build a fence that goes from wall to wall. So basically, you can block off half of the court yard by yourself and one fence. They need some kind of limited width on these fences.

And about catapults, I think it will come with the SRO:Middle East update.

Nenhunter wrote:as if nukes weren't unrealistic enough already?

phulshof wrote:

Nenhunter wrote:as if nukes weren't unrealistic enough already?

Do not underestimate the power of the Force young Skywalker!

raged! wrote:joymax to isro players: your not azn im not fixing it

CHIPS wrote:FW is pretty new, even for the Korean servers. So I am sure many adjustments will come in the future. But yes right now, it is very unfair for the siegers.

One thing that make FW very easy for the defenders is that, they can shoot and nuke even if they are behind the wall. For example, character A is a defending nuker on the top, and character B is an attacking nuker below.

|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B
|A --- C|B

The FW is designed so that, A can nuke B though the wall, while B cannot nuke A back. B can only nuke A if A stands at position C. But why would A stand at position C when he can nuke B just fine at position A? This is not only unfair, it is unrealistic. In real life, A does need to stand at C to hit B. I would much rather if players on the top of the wall gets a free 20% damage taken reduction, than they having the ability to shoot siegers below with no worries.

And I really do not like the idea of door repairing. How exactly do you repair the door in the middle of a siege? I mean, the damage to the door is done on the other side, so how can you repair it? It would make sense if the fortress controlling guild can pay money to upgrade their doors, so it have more hp initially. But once the siege starts, the door cannot be repaired at all.

And I also do not like how the fences are working now. Right now, one can build a fence that goes from wall to wall. So basically, you can block off half of the court yard by yourself and one fence. They need some kind of limited width on these fences.

And about catapults, I think it will come with the SRO:Middle East update.

BakaFish wrote:My union attacked and succeeded to win the fortress from SlayerS.

MrFudge wrote:they should just make it so the attacking unions cant hit eachother til they reach the heart lol.

its stupid when they do.

darkmaster21 wrote:

MrFudge wrote:they should just make it so the attacking unions cant hit eachother til they reach the heart lol.

its stupid when they do.

But that would take the fun out of keeping the opposing guilds out of the fortress. And that gives them a way way better increase in winning the war if they are sent to the heart. So then after your guild lost the fortress because you let them go straight to the heart, it wouldn't be a happy day for the GM lol.

DotCom wrote:Well...there is a bug which makes taking a fortress from defending union almost impossible. Anyone noticed that on many servers the entrance gate was not broken? Some guys said that in babel the whole server attacked 1 gate simultaneously and it took them 1 hour to get it down.

The bug is, that the attacking people cannot hit the defenders above the gate. The only area someone can attack is when a char is positioned right above the gate. BUT defenders can attack the people smashing the gate even from corners, while the offenders cant touch them. Imagine 4 wizards over there with aoe skills Even if they were full sun +15, wouldn't last for more than 10 sec. People can res you, but how long would it take to take down the gate? Now, to get it a bit more real, there weren't only 4 wizards but even nukers and bowers, and not to mention that defenders can repair the gate.

Well...if you ever participated in a fortress war then you know what h'm talking about...Its not that defenders have it easy, its just that attacking is ridiculously hard

PS: I've seen even bladers attack from above, maybe a glitch. Can anyone confirm?

MrFudge wrote:

darkmaster21 wrote:

MrFudge wrote:they should just make it so the attacking unions cant hit eachother til they reach the heart lol.

its stupid when they do.

But that would take the fun out of keeping the opposing guilds out of the fortress. And that gives them a way way better increase in winning the war if they are sent to the heart. So then after your guild lost the fortress because you let them go straight to the heart, it wouldn't be a happy day for the GM lol.

no i mean like.

if the defending union is 'silkroad' union.

and the attacking ones are 'online' 'forums' and ' mrfudge0wns'
then i mean online, forums, and mrfudge0wns shouldn't be able to kill eachother til they reach the heart.

cuz ive been hearing that those 3 own eachother and it makes it really easy for 'silkroad' to maintain fortress owners.