Page 1 of 1
Is this good?
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:55 am
by Double_D
i have the graphic card "GEforce 6200 256mb DDR2 TV DVI"
so is this good for running sro? and what resolution should my pc be on?
P.S: my monitor is 19"
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:01 pm
by Hasbin
My grafix card is even worse than urs. Geforce 6150SE onboard 128mb shared. I run sro at the usual 1024*768.
And im quite happy about the grafix. When im alone (not in town) and grinding i can put bloom effect on, and on medium and get smooth graphics. Just dont forget to put shadows off. Cause that lowers ur fps ALOT.
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:06 pm
by Double_D
i can adjust the quality according to what i see, but what i cant make sure of is the resolution... i want it the highest possoble with NO LAGGING
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:50 pm
by Doctor_MOS
Hasbin wrote:My grafix card is even worse than urs. Geforce 6150SE onboard 128mb shared. I run sro at the usual 1024*768.
And im quite happy about the grafix. When im alone (not in town) and grinding i can put bloom effect on, and on medium and get smooth graphics. Just dont forget to put shadows off. Cause that lowers ur fps ALOT.
Me have a fx5200 and it can STILL run silkroad...just hit for low xD
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:51 pm
by Faiien
lol you have the same cards as me
its pretty decent not great
but decent

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:54 pm
by BryaN
I got GFX card GeForce 5200 FX and I never have GFX lagg or loading laggs all high settings
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:56 pm
by DESOUL
Doctor_MOS wrote:Hasbin wrote:My grafix card is even worse than urs. Geforce 6150SE onboard 128mb shared. I run sro at the usual 1024*768.
And im quite happy about the grafix. When im alone (not in town) and grinding i can put bloom effect on, and on medium and get smooth graphics. Just dont forget to put shadows off. Cause that lowers ur fps ALOT.
Me have a fx5200 and it can STILL run silkroad...just hit for low xD
Yeh same here ;P i have a FX5200 and i can run the game on 1024x768 with high textures and bloom and don't have any laggs outisde of town while grinding. Well generally its not that important wich video cards you got, its the Mhz your cpu has and your ram that has a greated effect on the games performance..
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:03 pm
by Braka
ye most important thing seems to be the ram nowerdays since cpu in genral are high enough
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:04 pm
by DESOUL
Braka wrote:ye most important thing seems to be the ram nowerdays since cpu in genral are high enough
Well i wouldn't be sure ;P There still are some dinasaurs left like my pc xD
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:05 pm
by HellsAdvocate
lmao my old 64 MB GeForce3 ti 500 could running sro in 1280 * 1024 with max settings, lag of course due to the pentium 3, lulz but yea u can run w/e fine, now i got that 512 mb vid card hellz yea
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:09 pm
by Crumpets
Hasbin wrote:My grafix card is even worse than urs. Geforce 6150SE onboard 128mb shared. I run sro at the usual 1024*768.
And im quite happy about the grafix. When im alone (not in town) and grinding i can put bloom effect on, and on medium and get smooth graphics. Just dont forget to put shadows off. Cause that lowers ur fps ALOT.
Ouch 128 mb on a vid card : s. For stable playing your going to need to push the 512mb nowadays.
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:12 pm
by DESOUL
Crumpets wrote:Hasbin wrote:My grafix card is even worse than urs. Geforce 6150SE onboard 128mb shared. I run sro at the usual 1024*768.
And im quite happy about the grafix. When im alone (not in town) and grinding i can put bloom effect on, and on medium and get smooth graphics. Just dont forget to put shadows off. Cause that lowers ur fps ALOT.
Ouch 128 mb on a vid card : s. For stable playing your going to need to push the 512mb nowadays.
You don't really know much in video cards do you now? There aren't any full fledged 512mb video cards nowadays, there are just some cheap 512/128 cards wich work about like 256/128 ones, but stronger than 128/128 ones. I'd suggest you get a 256/128 one with some other options in it that'll smooth your performance not gimping yourself with a 512/128 one wich works like 6% better but has in some aspects lower performance.
Altough i don't remember, but i think GTXXX 8800 is the last card and has a performance like 768/256 or 768/128 but it costs alot if you ask me ;P
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:16 pm
by Crumpets
DESOUL wrote:
You don't really know much in video cards do you now? There aren't any full fledged 512mb video cards nowadays, there are just some cheap 512/128 cards wich work about like 256/128 ones, but stronger than 128/128 ones. I'd suggest you get a 256/128 one with some other options in it that'll smooth your performance not gimping yourself with a 512/128 one wich works like 6% better but has in some aspects lower performance.
Altough i don't remember, but i think GTXXX 8800 is the last card and has a performance like 768/256 or 768/128 but it costs alot if you ask me ;P
Looks like your the one who knows **** all m8.
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:19 pm
by DESOUL
Crumpets wrote:DESOUL wrote:
You don't really know much in video cards do you now? There aren't any full fledged 512mb video cards nowadays, there are just some cheap 512/128 cards wich work about like 256/128 ones, but stronger than 128/128 ones. I'd suggest you get a 256/128 one with some other options in it that'll smooth your performance not gimping yourself with a 512/128 one wich works like 6% better but has in some aspects lower performance.
Altough i don't remember, but i think GTXXX 8800 is the last card and has a performance like 768/256 or 768/128 but it costs alot if you ask me ;P
Looks like your the one who knows **** all m8.
Was that a insult? O.o
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:20 pm
by Crumpets
DESOUL wrote:
Was that a insult? O.o
Not at all, glad you did'nt take it that way either : >
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 10:11 pm
by MaTeJ