Page 1 of 1
Suggestions for new additions to SRO
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:37 am
by bplease
Put all the new ideas you have to make SRO a little more interesting.
On my guilds vent we were discussing a couple problems we have with the current chinese setup really. Below are our suggestions:
1) Bicheon skill must be within 9 levels of the shield desired to be equipped. This means glaivers with lvl 0 bicheon could pull out a lvl 8 shield. Also, this would allow for people to effectly form a 9 gap and use the proper equipment. This would hurt those attempting to switch weapons with 300/300, but could be remedied by dropping a force instead.
2) Heuksal/pacheon passives only work when proper weapon is equipped. Unequip a glaive and throw on a shield, lose the boost in HP. This would prevent int spear users from being able to nuke with a s/s setup to add for tanking ability.
3) Nullify use of Hawk when summoned using a bow, then weapon is switched.
Please provide input on others ideas, or suggest some of your own.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:45 am
by so STOOPS
new class =] maybe...like an AMERICA lololol...and they would dominate both countries. and then we could have north korea and africa and criizzap. we should so totally have guns as a weapon. like maplestory pirates
No but seriously. I think we need a better community that is willing to help.
Re: Suggestions for new additions to SRO
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:03 am
by Burningwolf
bplease wrote:Put all the new ideas you have to make SRO a little more interesting.
On my guilds vent we were discussing a couple problems we have with the current chinese setup really. Below are our suggestions:
1) Bicheon skill must be within 9 levels of the shield desired to be equipped. This means glaivers with lvl 0 bicheon could pull out a lvl 8 shield. Also, this would allow for people to effectly form a 9 gap and use the proper equipment. This would hurt those attempting to switch weapons with 300/300, but could be remedied by dropping a force instead.
2) Heuksal/pacheon passives only work when proper weapon is equipped. Unequip a glaive and throw on a shield, lose the boost in HP. This would prevent int spear users from being able to nuke with a s/s setup to add for tanking ability.
3) Nullify use of Hawk when summoned using a bow, then weapon is switched.
Please provide input on others ideas, or suggest some of your own.
but dont they have to sacrifice a force for that?
so they sacrifice something for that
Re: Suggestions for new additions to SRO
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:09 am
by -.-
bplease wrote:3) Nullify use of Hawk when summoned using a bow, then weapon is switched.
null snow shield when ints aren't holding a popsicle... this isnt euro, chinese buffs for themself so no need to restrict what buffs need weapons
Re: Suggestions for new additions to SRO
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:15 am
by MiKe 51-50
-.- wrote:bplease wrote:3) Nullify use of Hawk when summoned using a bow, then weapon is switched.
null snow shield when ints aren't holding a popsicle... this isnt euro, chinese buffs for themself so no need to restrict what buffs need weapons
yes I agree
Re: Suggestions for new additions to SRO
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:46 am
by knubbka
bplease wrote:Put all the new ideas you have to make SRO a little more interesting.
On my guilds vent we were discussing a couple problems we have with the current chinese setup really. Below are our suggestions:
1) Bicheon skill must be within 9 levels of the shield desired to be equipped. This means glaivers with lvl 0 bicheon could pull out a lvl 8 shield. Also, this would allow for people to effectly form a 9 gap and use the proper equipment. This would hurt those attempting to switch weapons with 300/300, but could be remedied by dropping a force instead.
2) Heuksal/pacheon passives only work when proper weapon is equipped. Unequip a glaive and throw on a shield, lose the boost in HP. This would prevent int spear users from being able to nuke with a s/s setup to add for tanking ability.
3) Nullify use of Hawk when summoned using a bow, then weapon is switched.
Please provide input on others ideas, or suggest some of your own.
what build do you have?
seriously..
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:35 am
by tedtwilliger
DEVIL WINGS!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:00 am
by NuclearSilo
useless thread. JM doesnt care at all
There were hundreads thread similar like this one.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:01 am
by 0nix
so STOOPS wrote:new class =] maybe...like an AMERICA lololol...and they would dominate both countries. and then we could have north korea and africa and criizzap. we should so totally have guns as a weapon. like maplestory pirates
No but seriously. I think we need a better community that is willing to help.
just play command and conquer:generals then.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:34 am
by satman83
tedtwilliger wrote:DEVIL WINGS!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:49 am
by torinchibi
...And now here are my suggestions. Since I am a Wizard/Cleric
1. Give wizard/clerics unlimited defense buff...
That is all.
Nevertheless, it would make sense for those things to be FIXED, yes, fixed. Those are just bugs that were never fixed because no one whined about them. You shouldn't be able to use the shield skill after switching (and that skill shouldn't even be part of the fire mastery since you won't use it if you can't switch unless you are blader or s/s nuker), and the hawk after switching... and keep all the weapon passives at the same time, etc, etc. They fixed those issues with the euro update, and if you notice, most of the buffs that stay on are party buffs like bless spell and earth barrier, and moving march, so getting those removed when you switch wouldn't make much sense, but the individual buffs at least were fixed so you can't use warrior skins with a wizard...rofl.....
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:14 am
by hootsh
Not to be a joy killer they're great suggestions and everything...but what should we do with them?
In other words (cause frankly i'm starting to get bored from those suggestion topics) they're just (purely and utterly) a waste of our time while we keep dreaming about the stuff we want to apply to the game.
If you really wanted to suggest something try the official forums...not that they will actually listen to anything but over here its pretty useless as well.
Not to flame or anything i'm just expressing my opinion.