Page 1 of 1
wtf...joymax give us a char-specific chat filter!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:30 am
by hawkstr1ke
i could probably code it in a few hours...would really help with the gold sellers/power levelers in town, not to mention the infantile nubs with diarrhea of the mouth and too many globals...
yeah, yeah i know you can select party, guild, union, but sometimes if you want to buy/sell things you need to set chat to 'all'
wtf joymax!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:51 am
by darkmaster21
Yeah this has already discussed. Its in kSRO but will probably never be in iSRO.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:52 am
by Renton
darkmaster21 wrote:Yeah this has already discussed. Its in kSRO but will probably never be in iSRO.
Thought someone posted that it didnt work
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:55 am
by Sylhana
Technically there is one working one for isro, but I cant post it here as it was integrated into something else which you shouldnt be using anyway. It was at one point a stand alone mod for the client. Would be nice if it could be released separately again, but I very much doubt it.
Re: wtf...joymax give us a char-specific chat filter!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:58 am
by peex
Joymax doesnt care... get used to it..
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:00 am
by SoBlu
hehe prolly more complicated and causes more issues then helps, just like the chat filter which promoted pk2 editing and caused more swearing.
Best thing is to go in a different direction, not fix the current issues that have yet to be fixed.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:31 am
by darkmaster21
Renton wrote:darkmaster21 wrote:Yeah this has already discussed. Its in kSRO but will probably never be in iSRO.
Thought someone posted that it didnt work
Yeah I thought about adding that, but why get people more disappointed of Joymax lol.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:49 am
by Jazz00006
Sylhana wrote:Technically there is one working one for isro, but I cant post it here as it was integrated into something else which you shouldnt be using anyway. It was at one point a stand alone mod for the client. Would be nice if it could be released separately again, but I very much doubt it.
^_^ I agree, and I know what you mean.