Page 1 of 3
SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:58 am
by zelzin
Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:01 am
by Carnophage
Ok and why do you say they don't enforce their policy?
Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:05 am
by Barotix
Carnophage wrote:Ok and why do you say they don't enforce their policy?
alot of people act certain ways; some dont even know there are rules
>.>
<.<
btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)
Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:09 am
by Carnophage
Barotix wrote:btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)
No idea, i was on another forum for a while

Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:10 am
by Aiyas
Carnophage wrote:Barotix wrote:btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)
No idea, i was on another forum for a while

I think flux finally gave up.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:12 am
by Luoma
yes first rizla then zypher and cin kept deleting the threads until he finally gave up.

for the mods hard work

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:15 am
by Carnophage
So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?
Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:17 am
by Aiyas
Carnophage wrote:So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?
Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Not really sure.
Unless this is his way of trying to say that mods should have the power to ban.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:17 am
by zelzin
Read the rules and then look around.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:19 am
by Carnophage
zelzin wrote:Read the rules and then look around.
Ok, better luck next time with that

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:19 am
by Barotix
Aiyas wrote:Carnophage wrote:So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?
Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Not really sure.
Unless this is his way of trying to say that mods should have the power to ban.
mods realy do need that power.
but if mods could ban... these forums would be kinda empty...
cause if you look around then look at the rules...
you will find alot of ban worthy folk...
some of my post are ban worthy
i think every1 has made at least 1 ban worthy post (lol 1)
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:22 am
by zelzin
You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.
I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:24 am
by Carnophage
zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.
Or they're just being a little leniant on the size of signature images. Sometimes it is annoying but not worthy of a dramatised title like this imo.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:25 am
by SiriusDude
zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.
I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.
Are you in 640 x 480 resolution?

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:25 am
by zelzin
1280x1024
You fail at life.
@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am
by Itonami
They can't ban at will. They have to wait for Ryoko or SuicideGrl to come take care of people 100%. Mods here do a good job.. there could be a few more yes, but they do a good job.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am
by SiriusDude
zelzin wrote:1280x1024
You fail at life.
Oh I see how the sigs take up so much space then.
And I also see how post count means everything, seeing as how before you edited the post, this message said "Your new here kid. Get out of my topic already."
edit: Nvm then
Still, join date doesn't mean much. I was lurking here far before I made my account, so there must be others who do that.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:29 am
by zelzin
Wasn't directed at you anyway.
Nice try.
EDIT:
Just because all you new kids are use to it this way doesn't make it acceptable.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:31 am
by Carnophage
zelzin wrote:
@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.
You act like i care, that's cute

zelzin wrote:Wasn't directed at you anyway.
Nice try.
EDIT:
Just because all you new kids are use to it this way doesn't make it acceptable.
Has nothing to do with me being new to this forum, you have no idea how much time i have spent on other forums so please don't be so cocky in the future.
I gave you my opinion that it can be annoying but your topic title is comparing it to the huge botting problems of Joymax. Thats just plain drama.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:37 am
by zelzin
For someone that doesn't care you keep coming back into the thread...
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am
by Luoma
zelzin wrote:@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.
it doesn't really matter when you joined >_>
i see far more respect in for example Itonami's posts than yours

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am
by Barotix
zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.
I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.
who me??
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am
by Carnophage
zelzin wrote:For someone that doesn't care you keep coming back into the thread...
Someone that doesn't care about what?...
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:40 am
by Aiyas
For anyone that has any issues with the way the rules of the forums are enforced, please PM a moderator or an administrator with your concerns. It will be more effective and will prevent flaming.
Thank you.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:42 am
by rumpleKillskin
online fights ftw....

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:43 am
by Itonami
For someone who thinks mods don't do their job and are tired of the flaming, you sure are on the right road for a warning and this thread has already started a bit of a flame.
SAVE THE THREAD!!!! ONLY YOU CAN PREVENT FORUM FIRE!!!
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:45 am
by zelzin
Point? Nothing will come of it.
BAN = New Account (just ask spiritpower)
Flame = Acceptable (duh)
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:46 am
by rumpleKillskin
zelzin, no offence but u just offered your self to get flamed on this topic, seriously
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 am
by zelzin
I know dude. But I really don't care.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 am
by Luoma
zelzin wrote:Point? Nothing will come of it.
BAN = New Account (just ask spiritpower)
Flame = Acceptable (duh)
there is a magic thing called ip ban
