SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:58 am

http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=25

FFS

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:01 am

zelzin wrote:http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=25

FFS

Ok and why do you say they don't enforce their policy?

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:05 am

Carnophage wrote:
zelzin wrote:http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=25

FFS

Ok and why do you say they don't enforce their policy?

alot of people act certain ways; some dont even know there are rules
>.>
<.<

btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:09 am

Barotix wrote:btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)

No idea, i was on another forum for a while

Aiyas · Post by **Aiyas** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:10 am

Carnophage wrote:
Barotix wrote:btw did fluxfire get banned; i was on youtube watching sro related stuff
so i couldnt keep up with the war between the mods and flux (mods won)

No idea, i was on another forum for a while

I think flux finally gave up.

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:12 am

yes first rizla then zypher and cin kept deleting the threads until he finally gave up.

:love:

for the mods hard work

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:15 am

So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?

:?:

Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Aiyas · Post by **Aiyas** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:17 am

Carnophage wrote:So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?

Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Not really sure.

Unless this is his way of trying to say that mods should have the power to ban.

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:17 am

Read the rules and then look around.

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:19 am

zelzin wrote:Read the rules and then look around.

Ok, better luck next time with that

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:19 am

Aiyas wrote:
Carnophage wrote:So what is this guy's problem with the SRF policy enforcement?

Nice work mod's, to bad you have to deal with a spaz like that in such a time consuming way.

Not really sure.

Unless this is his way of trying to say that mods should have the power to ban.

mods realy do need that power.

but if mods could ban... these forums would be kinda empty...
cause if you look around then look at the rules...

you will find alot of ban worthy folk...
some of my post are ban worthy
i think every1 has made at least 1 ban worthy post (lol 1)

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:22 am

You're already breaking a rule with every post.

Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.

I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:24 am

zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.

Or they're just being a little leniant on the size of signature images. Sometimes it is annoying but not worthy of a dramatised title like this imo.

SiriusDude · Post by **SiriusDude** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:25 am

zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.

I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.

Are you in 640 x 480 resolution? :shock:

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:25 am

1280x1024

You fail at life.

@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.

Itonami · Post by **Itonami** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am

They can't ban at will. They have to wait for Ryoko or SuicideGrl to come take care of people 100%. Mods here do a good job.. there could be a few more yes, but they do a good job.

SiriusDude · Post by **SiriusDude** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am

zelzin wrote:1280x1024

You fail at life.

Oh I see how the sigs take up so much space then.

And I also see how post count means everything, seeing as how before you edited the post, this message said "Your new here kid. Get out of my topic already."

edit: Nvm then :shock:

Still, join date doesn't mean much. I was lurking here far before I made my account, so there must be others who do that.

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:29 am

Wasn't directed at you anyway.

Nice try.

EDIT:

Just because all you new kids are use to it this way doesn't make it acceptable.

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:31 am

zelzin wrote:
@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.

You act like i care, that's cute

zelzin wrote:Wasn't directed at you anyway.

Nice try.

EDIT:

Just because all you new kids are use to it this way doesn't make it acceptable.

Has nothing to do with me being new to this forum, you have no idea how much time i have spent on other forums so please don't be so cocky in the future.

I gave you my opinion that it can be annoying but your topic title is comparing it to the huge botting problems of Joymax. Thats just plain drama.

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:37 am

For someone that doesn't care you keep coming back into the thread...

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am

zelzin wrote:@Carnophage - You joined when? Oh, I see.

it doesn't really matter when you joined >_>

i see far more respect in for example Itonami's posts than yours

Barotix · Post by **Barotix** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am

zelzin wrote:You're already breaking a rule with every post.
Signatures may include:
* One large image 550 x 200 pixels or less
* Two small banners or one large banner 550 pixels or less.

I'm sorry. But you're not as important to me as you think. No need for your one little post to take up my whole browser window.

who me??

Carnophage · Post by **Carnophage** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 am

zelzin wrote:For someone that doesn't care you keep coming back into the thread...

Someone that doesn't care about what?...

Aiyas · Post by **Aiyas** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:40 am

For anyone that has any issues with the way the rules of the forums are enforced, please PM a moderator or an administrator with your concerns. It will be more effective and will prevent flaming.

Thank you.

rumpleKillskin · Post by **rumpleKillskin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:42 am

online fights ftw.... :banghead:

Itonami · Post by **Itonami** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:43 am

For someone who thinks mods don't do their job and are tired of the flaming, you sure are on the right road for a warning and this thread has already started a bit of a flame.

SAVE THE THREAD!!!! ONLY YOU CAN PREVENT FORUM FIRE!!!

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:45 am

Point? Nothing will come of it.

BAN = New Account (just ask spiritpower)
Flame = Acceptable (duh)

rumpleKillskin · Post by **rumpleKillskin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:46 am

zelzin, no offence but u just offered your self to get flamed on this topic, seriously

zelzin · Post by **zelzin** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 am

I know dude. But I really don't care.

Luoma · Post by **Luoma** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:47 am

zelzin wrote:Point? Nothing will come of it.

BAN = New Account (just ask spiritpower)
Flame = Acceptable (duh)

there is a magic thing called ip ban :!:

Silkroad Online Forums

SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO

Re: SRF has about as much enforcement of policy as SRO