Page 1 of 2
Graphics card
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:37 am
by nphillip
i was just wondering, who has a graphic card installed in there comp?
if you do, could you tell me the name of it and how good it is?
thankyou
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:44 am
by Itonami
This belongs in tech help I think, or OTL
I have a 'GeForce 8800GTS' according to the video card box poking out form under my best. It's pretty awesome, but has some heat issues. -_-;
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:35 am
by Necro-Mage
Itonami wrote:This belongs in tech help I think, or OTL

I have a 'GeForce 8800GTS' according to the video card box poking out form under my best. It's pretty awesome, but has some heat issues. -_-;
Isn't that like one of the newer graphics card out in the market?
I have a Geforce FX 5200 (Yes I know, it's old).
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:41 am
by Poochu
GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
**sli = 2 of the card

, hehehehe, £400 (around $800) of graphics card.
but, it mops the floor with any, and i mean any other graphics card, and it will be able to run new games for atleast a couple years.
it is seriously worth the huge price tag. cos if you buy a mid range card for £100ish, it wont work on newer performance games that come out.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:33 am
by Midori
had to replace my 9800 pro with a 5200... but im getting a new comp with a 7600
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:35 am
by Locketart
I still have a 7800 gt but if I can get a job this fall semester, I'll save up for a 8800 gts unless I want to go to Vietnam next summer in which I'll have to save up for the ticket. =)
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:05 am
by hootsh
I have the Geforce MX/MX thing...downloaded it from their site lol..
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:36 am
by godisaglavier
DO NOT LAUGH!
ATI READON 9200

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:39 am
by Gusy
Used to have a X300 played on medium graphics
Now a 7600 (I know its not that good) play on max graphics

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:45 am
by Arwald
I have a GeForce FX 5200 and lags on low graphics

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:48 am
by DS^
7900GTX, wanted to buy a 8800GTS but spent my money to a new tv.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:21 am
by Poochu
serisouly guys. those of you want new cards.
look into the gigabyte geforce 6600 gt 128mb (not the 256mb, its slower)
its about £60-80 now, and is still awsome, i have one in my other pc, and can run cs:s on full graphics and battlefield 2 on full everything except shadows

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:21 pm
by Davids
I used to have nVIDIA FX 5200 too, but then I changed to RADEON X800 GTO (256MB, 256Bit).
Also added 1GB ram (now 1.5gb) and it still laggs on high.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:32 pm
by Crumpets
Arwald wrote:I have a GeForce FX 5200 and lags on low graphics

Then you have very low RAM probably like 512mb.
I had a 5200 FX like when sro went beta and I did fine on high with 1 GB RAM, recently upgrade my vid card to a 8600-ULTRA and 4GB ram.... runs perfectly + more.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:35 pm
by ThatBluePerson
My graphics are integrated RAMDAC, 256 MB, runs perfectly fine on high with 2gigs of ram.

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:53 pm
by darkblazer1
ATI, Radeon x1650 series [ hp f1703]
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:56 pm
by Vandango
darkblazer1 wrote:ATI, Radeon x1650 series [ hp f1703]
I Love you
I Have the very same 1 ^^
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:47 pm
by Midori
godisaglavier wrote:DO NOT LAUGH!
ATI READON 9200

it's alright... 5200 = 9200
Poochu wrote:serisouly guys. those of you want new cards.
look into the gigabyte geforce 6600 gt 128mb (not the 256mb, its slower)
its about £60-80 now, and is still awsome, i have one in my other pc, and can run cs:s on full graphics and battlefield 2 on full everything except shadows

but what if i want shadows?
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:52 pm
by Crumpets
X-Lax wrote:it's alright... 5200 = 9200
Poochu wrote:serisouly guys. those of you want new cards.
look into the gigabyte geforce 6600 gt 128mb (not the 256mb, its slower)
its about £60-80 now, and is still awsome, i have one in my other pc, and can run cs:s on full graphics and battlefield 2 on full everything except shadows

but what if i want shadows?
In mid January of 06' I could run shadows on high with a 5200 FX.
I guess shadows has more to do with your RAM. To solve many, many of sro's problems I'd recommend getting a block of RAM for like 40$ instead of spending 300$ on a GFX card.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:58 pm
by pentuim3HS
Poochu wrote:GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
**sli = 2 of the card

, hehehehe, £400 (around $800) of graphics card.
but, it mops the floor with any, and i mean any other graphics card, and it will be able to run new games for atleast a couple years.
it is seriously worth the huge price tag. cos if you buy a mid range card for £100ish, it wont work on newer performance games that come out.
theres no point going Sli with the 8800 GTX yet

theres no processor that can handle its speed... so it gets bottlenecked

so im still waiting to use my second 8800 -.-'
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:13 pm
by FireVortex
downloaded one from site which occasionally causes my game to crash with a bunch of question marks wondow coming up
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:16 pm
by Disconn3cted
i have geforce 7900 can run on max settings but can only turn on detailed shadows when in an area with a low population
has anyone else noticed if you turn on detailed shadows at ice or caves you still get lags but no shadows are displayed
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:26 pm
by EvilDiablo
hootsh wrote:I have the Geforce MX/MX thing...downloaded it from their site lol..
uggghhh, you have what i just had before i got my new computer, it was a Geforce2 MX/MX400, ill tell ya guys my new one when i get home
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:36 pm
by Riggs
I've got NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
Pretty good
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:51 pm
by shoto
x1900xt...decent card
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:55 pm
by Poochu
pentuim3HS wrote:Poochu wrote:GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
**sli = 2 of the card

, hehehehe, £400 (around $800) of graphics card.
but, it mops the floor with any, and i mean any other graphics card, and it will be able to run new games for atleast a couple years.
it is seriously worth the huge price tag. cos if you buy a mid range card for £100ish, it wont work on newer performance games that come out.
theres no point going Sli with the 8800 GTX yet

theres no processor that can handle its speed... so it gets bottlenecked

so im still waiting to use my second 8800 -.-'
^^, depends, thats if your running quad core. lol.
but, quad core isnt all its cracked up to be, i have it, all you really can do is multi task even faster
(i can run, firefox, media player, silkroad, msn, xfire, aim, and all my av/firewall spyware programs at the same time

)
2 years of combined pc building ^_^, and the wonders of working in a pc shop. lol (its good money seeing as were the only one for about 30 miles around)
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:49 pm
by nycxfool
nvidia geforce 8800GTX
heats up like a motherf.ucker though
Poochu wrote:GeForce 8800 GTX SLI
**sli = 2 of the card

, hehehehe, £400 (around $800) of graphics card.
but, it mops the floor with any, and i mean any other graphics card, and it will be able to run new games for atleast a couple years.
it is seriously worth the huge price tag. cos if you buy a mid range card for £100ish, it wont work on newer performance games that come out.
like overheating much?
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:54 pm
by crazy_foo
Riggs wrote:I've got NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
Pretty good
ya I got a 7900 GS as well and it works perfectly fine for all direct x 9 games and below and I like it

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:55 pm
by ssjkakarot
godisaglavier wrote:DO NOT LAUGH!
ATI READON 9200

Its ok, I got Ati Mobility Radeon 9100. Its a laptop, so i can update it, even if i wanted 2, (I updated the motherboard and the ram, just not card)
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:56 pm
by Soulhaitetsu
ATi Radeon X800
... does the job...
... came as stock...
I'm not complaining.