Page 1 of 2
To many Guilds-Unions
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:01 am
by achmalach
Wouldn't it be great that there would be a limit on the amount of guilds-unions a server can have?
Then there would be:
* More wars (now there is a serious lack of wars just because like 90% of the guilds don't have enough members)
* More competition between the unions-guilds
* More fun in trading-hunting-thieving
That's why i really hope the castle wars will come soon. Then people will have to combine forces and merge into large active guilds and unions or they will not be able to even try to compete for a castle...
It would be nice to know that each guild has like 30 active members so you can war them anytime

Re: To many Guilds-Unions
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:07 am
by truez
achmalach wrote:Wouldn't it be great that there would be a limit on the amount of guilds-unions a server can have?
Then there would be:
* More wars (now there is a serious lack of wars just because like 90% of the guilds don't have enough members)
* More competition between the unions-guilds
* More fun in trading-hunting-thieving
That's why i really hope the castle wars will come soon. Then people will have to combine forces and merge into large active guilds and unions or they will not be able to even try to compete for a castle...It would be nice to know that each guild has like 30 active members so you can war them anytime

Castle war is a game that is designed to have a team war... but SRO is a not mandatorily a team game.. unless the EURO comes out ..
May b v can c some change wen EURO comes out .. where u need to b in a party to lvl up ..... solo players in EURO sucks as my character that i have now

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:09 am
by sunmoon
lol, u say there's too many...i say there's too little...there may be tons & tons of guilds/unions in game, but only a few stands out

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:12 am
by achmalach
sunmoon wrote:lol, u say there's too many...i say there's too little...there may be tons & tons of guilds/unions in game, but only a few stands out

Indeed and the simple reason for that is: there are to many.
The good players are scattered over so many guilds that in average you would see each guild has like maybe 1 good player in it... That's the reason why only a few guilds/unions are standing out...
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:06 am
by heroo
yeah i think it woul be great to, less guilds = more competition = more fun

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:06 pm
by DaZzY
Yup i think there is way too many guild on Greece tho there is only 3 or 4 that are strong and known...
-DaZzY
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:14 pm
by IceCrash
>.< wrote:Yup i think there is way too many guild on Greece tho there is only 3 or 4 that are strong and known...
-DaZzY
mostly cause they're 24/7 afk guilds or if its a legit guild everyone grinds or jobs while im sleeping...like my guild :/
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:20 pm
by [SD]BarbieGirl
I think that guild should cost way MORE then 500K and they should make it more effective and fun!
That would solve the problems

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:26 pm
by DaZzY
[SD]BarbieGirl wrote:I think that guild should cost way MORE then 500K and they should make it more effective and fun!
That would solve the problems

+1 they should make it 50mil lmao <3
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:43 pm
by Lixiae
>.< wrote:[SD]BarbieGirl wrote:I think that guild should cost way MORE then 500K and they should make it more effective and fun!
That would solve the problems

+1 they should make it 50mil lmao <3
Doesnt it already cost close to 50m to make a lvl 5 guild?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:51 pm
by IceCrash
>.< wrote:[SD]BarbieGirl wrote:I think that guild should cost way MORE then 500K and they should make it more effective and fun!
That would solve the problems

+1 they should make it 50mil lmao <3
rofl
but well i do support that it should take more money to make a guild cause i mean.....everyone has a guild nowadays, its so easy to make one...
If it was harder to make a guild and not evryone could make a guild, there would be less guilds and each would be more fun cause more ppl would be in them making a huge family

.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:19 pm
by JackB4u3r
It would be good to have like the 12 Great Houses of Silkroad or something like that
Then each house is ruled by 6 most powerful members of it.
Then a war between two houses would be a big event

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:26 pm
by bLuE_fLaMe
this is the stupidest topic ever, who cares how many guilds are on a server and like getting rid of them for no reason will really do anything... they will eventualy coem back
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:31 pm
by disturbed666
i can see it already...NetWarriors winning the castle siege..then being the douche bags they are, will raise everything by 1200% and kill the whole server. and they will be able to do everything because Eldest is the biggest scammer in the flippin world.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:51 pm
by achmalach
bLuE_fLaMe wrote:this is the stupidest topic ever, who cares how many guilds are on a server and like getting rid of them for no reason will really do anything... they will eventualy coem back
if you don't care mister
'i don't read the topic very well and i just make comments on my own interpretation of something' then don't join the convo
disturbed666 wrote:i can see it already...NetWarriors winning the castle siege..then being the douche bags they are, will raise everything by 1200% and kill the whole server. and they will be able to do everything because Eldest is the biggest scammer in the flippin world.
Maybe, maybe not, they won't be able to hold all the castles and if they do then other guilds unions will have to combine forces to break that
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:52 pm
by achmalach
[NF]IceCrash wrote:>.< wrote:[SD]BarbieGirl wrote:I think that guild should cost way MORE then 500K and they should make it more effective and fun!
That would solve the problems

+1 they should make it 50mil lmao <3
rofl
but well i do support that it should take more money to make a guild cause i mean.....everyone has a guild nowadays, its so easy to make one...
If it was harder to make a guild and not evryone could make a guild, there would be less guilds and each would be more fun cause more ppl would be in them making a huge family

.
Indeed and that would make every aspect of the game more interesting
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:53 pm
by Irritated
its not like that on venice.
There are 3 huge unions on venice, Vietz_Bloodz union, H20 union, and China city union. (and like 5 more that are well known but don't have as many levle 80s)
vietz bloodz and h20 go at eachother constantly, pretty much any time of day u can go to donwhang and see a huge job war.
I like it the way it is right now as far as number of guilds/unions. Its gonna be a huge fight when siege war comes out, gonna be so many global spammers and people talking trash that the server will lag, reset, explode.
EDIT: the unions aren't in order by how good they are or anything, so don't flame me, cuz i know there is some immature guy here from one of those unions that would say something.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:13 pm
by HertogJan
Only reason IMO why it isnt working right now is because of the many huge ego's there are. There are a lot of high ranked people that want to be guild master. Thats why only a few guilds stand out, mostly simply by the way they are runned.
And well money attracts money, if you are a lvl 75 or so in a guild that has 3 other 7X members, you get a sosun drop. The world suddenly opens up for you, I can imagen.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:35 pm
by dabat
Well, what about low levels? If it was the case, there couldnt be any low level guild for the peepz to join. And seriously, Silk sucks without having a nice guild.
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:30 pm
by xMoDx
disturbed666 wrote:i can see it already...NetWarriors winning the castle siege..
NW... no more........

GL to new guild and give bright future again for us thief clans..... die hunters.....
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:39 pm
by disturbed667
LMFAO netwarriours got PWNT! from what ive heard, he handed the leadership to a guildie and he disbanded the whole thing!! ahahaha

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:43 pm
by EllisD
I think a cool addition would be a Union war function, instead of just a Guild war function.
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:52 pm
by borat2
rather have a goal on why joining a guild since right now the only reason why anyone would is for guildwars rest can be done with friends from your server.
i rather see they change this new job system with forced job for a whole guild.
for example guild leader just pays an amount of gp (large) and gold to switch whole guild to a job. that way you will need to make sure you union has a variety of hunters/traders.
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:05 pm
by Silver0
all the big guilds in olympus make me sick so when it does come out iam moving to venice or oasis
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:25 pm
by Mortal7
You should have to be level 45 to create a guild and it costs 2 million. I think this would reduce it enough but not to much.

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:32 pm
by rumpleKillskin
ahha ya disturbed, netwarriors, but didnt something happen to them yesterday????
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:50 pm
by xdiviner
if castle seige comes out in ISRO i hope i fricking hope to god that nice guilds make the items cheaper >_< and hopefully no @sshole guilds up the price soo much it screws the economy even more
so if your guild has the power to change the economy please make the items cheaper

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:53 pm
by Da_Realest
Forcing players to work together will only cause more problems and disorganization. Many players will will be guildless to avoid it.
Castle wars? When ever people come together just to be the strongest union or guild, betrayal, corruption, etc. is soon to follow.
Things are ok the way they are now. Some people worked hard to make their guild known. If you see someone's guild/union emblem and either, respect them, hate them, or never heard of them, then they've earned that. It helps create individuality and gives people something to strive for. Maybe someone wants their guild/union to be the most feared or respected on the server. Maybe someone wants their guild/union to fly on the radar or other reasons.
Some people only form guilds to chat with all their friends easier. Since this game is continuously growing, and because of the idea you suggested, there is bound to be people in your union/guild who won't be able to speak the same language. There would be at least 3 different languages being spoken in guild/union chat. Or even worse, the game would be war of the nationalities. All Turks in one union, Germans in another, Americans in one union, etc.
It would also be a big strain on guild leaders trying to make sure rules are followed and people in guild are treated fairly. This would be an even greater strain on the player who is the leader of the union. Forget being legit. There would be no way to monitor it all.
I believe there is a serious lack of wars because 60% of your members are stuck in server traffic or refuse to deal with it.
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:39 am
by Black_Mamba
Guilds suck, 90% of the time everyones bitching, bickering, arguing, talking like their 10 years old and the orange text just looks arse and harder to read than the whispers or party chat. The only reason I'm in a guild is cuz if your not you just get spammed with pop ups all day from people trying to get you into one.
I only talk to a handful of people and that's just how I like it, that's also the reason why there's so many small guilds, not everyone is fussed about big guilds.
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:01 am
by yamataka
One of the very first things my friends and I did was make a guild as soon as we could so that we could talk together easier ... and do stuff together. There have been some ups and downs ... but a good guild is one of the best things about SRO.
Guilds are a BIG help when you are first starting out in SRO ... as a way to share advice and learn from each other when you are first learning to play the game.