Page 1 of 1
SO how does Satalite Broadband affect SRO????
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:30 pm
by jamesrp
I was wondering if any one here has the satalite broadband ( in the states) and how does it affect gaming??? I was reading and saw that it might possibly lag???? Does any one know ???
Thanks in advance peeps!!!!!

Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:32 pm
by Tainted
Satalite isn't that great period for the cost. It's not good for gaming at all.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:13 pm
by justaskphil
Couple of friends have satellite...it's a little laggy all the time but not unplayable.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:19 pm
by Gaara
Sattelite is not great at all, in fact it's practically a last resort before looking to dial-up because most of the people who get sattelite usually travel alot or they live out of city limits so that better internet cannot reach them.
Sattelite usually puts out 125k top DL speeds and totall internet connection is about 1.1mps.
It just overall sucks. + if you have an ooberbad storm you won't be able to do anything on internet.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 6:12 pm
by xian
Many connection varieties have lag for all sorts of reasons, but it's really not that serious a problem with satellite. However, put bluntly, I don't think anyone should bother getting satellite unless they're in a situation where it's the only viable option available to them. It has numerous other flaws that don't exist with cables...
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:14 pm
by xMoDx
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:48 pm
by jamesrp
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 9:17 pm
by Tainted
You should be fine if you're playing sro but dont expect any decent pings in a fps.
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 11:40 am
by xian
It really relies on the sort of lag you're having. Sometimes, it's not the connection that's the problem, but your computer's hardware and the available memory.
If you're running graphics/video settings that your card/chipset can't handle or are running too many memory-intense applications, your game can be pretty slow and jumpy.
If that's the case, close everything you don't need before running SRO. Once you've logged on, check your graphics settings. Surprisingly, shadows leech more than reflections in SRO, so one of the first things you should lower the settings for to test improvement is the in-game shadows. After that, it's really up to what your hardware is capable of.
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:31 pm
by jamesrp
oh no there no problem with my computer its a 3500.00 system with the newest nividia 7900( newest on the market ) duo core 2.66GHZ 6700 and 2 hard drives totaling 640 GB and the psysX card. i shouldn't lag

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:39 pm
by zZh4ku
7900 is not the newest.
there are ALOT MORE NEWER and BETTER one like 7950gtx
even nvidia 8800GTX/GTS are out for direct X 10..
kthx bye
satellite sux btw
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:43 pm
by jamesrp
zZh4ku wrote:7900 is not the newest.
there are ALOT MORE NEWER and BETTER one like 7950gtx
even nvidia 8800GTX/GTS are out for direct X 10..
kthx bye

satellite sux btw
Well i know its the newest 1 because thay had to come replace it a few weeks ago i had a bad one. i cant remember what the number is Sorry

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:01 am
by xian
jamesrp wrote:zZh4ku wrote:7900 is not the newest.
there are ALOT MORE NEWER and BETTER one like 7950gtx :!:
even nvidia 8800GTX/GTS are out for direct X 10..
kthx bye :P
satellite sux btw
Well i know its the newest 1 because thay had to come replace it a few weeks ago i had a bad one. i cant remember what the number is Sorry :roll:
Actually, James was pretty right.
The GeForce 7900s from the GeForce 7 series were released in July
last year, and the newest GeForce is the GeForce 8800 Ultra, which was released
last week.
Between that and the GeForce 7900, there has been the GeForce 7950 GT, the GeForce 7950 GX2, the GeForce 8500 GT, the GeForce 8600 GT, the GeForce 8600 GTS, the GeForce 8800 GTS, and the GeForce 8800 GTX...
That almost 12 months of GeForce releases. If you were referring solely to the 7 series, the newest is the 7950 GX2, not the 7900.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:18 am
by zZh4ku
8800 has been released for months..
its has been released last month in australia i guess
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:41 am
by xian
zZh4ku wrote:8800 has been released for months..
its has been released last month in australia i guess
Whatever you were trying to argue, you "
phail" (sic).
Firstly, Australia is not months behind with graphics hardware, particularly since the US film studios often come to us for our special effects jobs, and since we have a large number of mainstream console game programmers here.
Secondly, there are multiple 8800s. To clarify, the first was released almost exactly six months ago (Nov 8), HOWEVER, the newest was launched a week ago (May 2). Those are the
international release dates.
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 1:10 am
by MrH
If you are talking about satellite and NOT wireless, with satellite you should expect roughly a 200-500ms response time on top of what you would expect from a DSL connection. Satellite is about the worst type of internet connection you can buy. It is possible to get wireless internet in rural areas, this usually has a higher bit rate (usually 1-3Mbps range) and is in line of sight to the microwave tower.
I would only recommend satellite/wireless internet as a last resort. It is expensive, slow, and consistently has problems (weather, alignment..etc).
The internet backbone really does not apply in this situation. Most smaller ISP's usually peer with a larger ISP..These larger ISPs (verizon, bell south, TELUS, cogeco, comcast, Level 3, Global crossing, AT&T,...etc) usually peer directly with each other at a POP (point of presence). Most of the problems with satellite/wireless internet is between the customer premises equipment and the closest tower/satellite.