Page 1 of 1
The solution to the crowded servers
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
by curixq
Some years ago I played knightonline but pfft it I didn't like it. BUT they have a good server system.
It is simple, instea of one server Athens, Sparta, etc etc, why can't you make 3 of them? Like: Athens1 Athens2 Athens3 and Sparta1 Sparta2 Sparta3 (and the other servers)
The people who made an character on the Athens server should be able to play also with the same character on the other Athens server. (and talk with their friends and guild on the other 2 "servers)
The number of players then is divided into 3... so less people.
That's all I want to say.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:03 pm
by Sharp324
But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:06 pm
by deep.in
Sharp324 wrote:But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...
I don't see JM doing smth on sro at all...
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:07 pm
by TaicaCuu
Sharp324 wrote:But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...
Exactly

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:19 pm
by ilovetibet
ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:19 pm
by HertogJan
Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.
athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights
Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.
Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:22 pm
by satman83
ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:23 pm
by urtoasty
HertogJan wrote:Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.
athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights
Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.
Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.
that might be able to work. they just need to start doing it. They need to start making special servers...for people over 20+.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:24 pm
by Zero_Doom
I like the game to be put into one server each. There are some issues with 3 different servers, one for each thing. Like, if someone kses me, I can't taunt them to try and kill me or pvp me, or w/e. I can't instantly log off the grinding server and go into pvp/jobbing, I would probably have to sit and wait for one of the millions of bots to log off.
It would be a better idea to increase server's maximum capacity, and to actually turn on gamegaurd. I hear that kSRO won't even turn on if there are edits to the pk2 files, or if there is a bot program running. And it has the same gamegaurd thing going, maybe thats the reason we have so many bots.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:25 pm
by ilovetibet
satman83 wrote:ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha

i read about it in the ksro news
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:25 pm
by Sharp324
satman83 wrote:ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:25 pm
by heroo
ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
wuahahhah1 BILLION lol, they wish... -.-

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:32 pm
by TwelveEleven
It prolly aint profit...
It can very well be that they 'made' 1 billion out of iSro.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:32 pm
by YourDaddy
ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
Did you know the word "Gullible" isn't in the dictionary?
And fyi, there's a big difference between "I read it in the korean news" and "I read it on a forum that's predominately 12-16 yr olds".
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:36 pm
by Sharp324
TwelveEleven wrote:It prolly aint profit...
It can very well be that they 'made' 1 billion out of iSro.
was about to say the same, yeah probably isnt their profit but the total money they made before they took out expenses
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:44 pm
by mushrooms
Sharp324 wrote:satman83 wrote:ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.
Dude, even Harry Potter doesn't make that much. How the heck would this make anymore?
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:49 pm
by satman83
mushrooms wrote:Sharp324 wrote:satman83 wrote:ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.
Dude, even Harry Potter doesn't make that much. How the heck would this make anymore?
lol..i think "yourdaddy" sums it up nicely
YourDaddy wrote:Did you know the word "Gullible" isn't in the dictionary?
And fyi, there's a big difference between "I read it in the korean news" and "I read it on a forum that's predominately 12-16 yr olds".
lol...just because you read something on the internet doesnt make
it true ok

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:10 pm
by StealMySoda
Ive got an idea.
BAN BOTS ^^
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:32 pm
by PsYch008
we arent denying that joynax makes plenty of money, we are denying their willingness to change the game.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 5:37 pm
by skyduck
Better solutions... I think...
- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:04 pm
by blahhhhhO_o
skyduck wrote:Better solutions... I think...
- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.
the second and third idea r terible
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:21 pm
by PR0METHEUS
blahhhhhO_o wrote:skyduck wrote:Better solutions... I think...
- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.
the second and third idea r terible
Why is the second idea terrible? Why should you need to have the ability to stall at lvl 1? It doesn't take very long at all to get to level 5 or even 10. So if you create a character and get a really nice drop at lvl 2 (I doubt it) then just wait a day or so until you get to lvl 10 and stall that drop.
Level 1 characters really don't need to be stalling at all. There's no real reason that I can see.
As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:31 pm
by skyduck
Okay, I agree the 3rd idea was bad... I haven't thought about internet cafes and universities and stuffs.
and to clarify the 2nd idea I meant for example in order to stall in say Hotan,
the stall character has to be say level 50 or higher.
Then, you won't see all those level 1 char stalls packing every inch in Hotan.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:38 pm
by Innovacious
ilovetibet wrote:ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam
this was proven wrong already, the person who translated it had absolutley no idea what he was on about.
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:53 pm
by Vandango
PR0METHEUS wrote:
As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.
that would also Eradicate clientless farming due to the program being on a server 1 server same IP i think
1 server can carry like 50 bots at a time
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:40 pm
by BaronSengir
they should indeed cut the stalling to auction house damn people covering every corner in hotan and covering up the npcs its pretty damn annoying
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:23 am
by PR0METHEUS
Karlos Vandango wrote:PR0METHEUS wrote:
As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.
that would also Eradicate clientless farming due to the program being on a server 1 server same IP i think
1 server can carry like 50 bots at a time
Yes but that's not really a solution to the bot problem (I know that's not what this thread's about). Solve that problem by preventing them from logging in, not by blocking groups of IPs that DO log in clientless.
If you block multiple logins from the same IP, you're potentially preventing a LOT of silk-buying legit players who happen to be at universities or internet cafes or the like.... all in the name of blocking some bots who will just change their IP.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:55 am
by truez
HertogJan wrote:Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.
athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights
Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.
Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.
This wuldnt be possible.... Ppl wit gold tickets wuld grind for 3 hrs ... at other times they try to do some jobs or cap fights..... so most of time ..ppl are grinding
