Yahoo suing Joymax?

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:27 pm

this is from the UNBAN MASTER-WONG thread on Sro.net

" A class lawsuit is curently being filed against Joymax by its parent company. Yahoo, currently under the belief that Joymax and its staff are running their corparation under false pretenses, and false advertisments. This in general being MMOMassive MultiPLAYER online. Their current devision known as SRO is being mis-advertised. The general public which is playing in corespondance with the ToS is being abused. While the Illegal activites are being disregarded for the sake of income/revenue.
The term known as bot refers to an automated character which roam the virtual world of SRO. JM and its staff have ingored and have been instructed by its CEO to disregard these illegal activites. To what extend and for what porpose seems all too obvious, bots increse and amount for over 70 of all income generated by SRO and its affiliates.

This is s public notice and will remain on http://www.silkroadonline.net , aswell the head office is being notified as I write this notice.

Wrongfull bans such as 5 recent bans which occoured within a 1 week period will be investigated promtly.

Thank you for reading this, and enjoy your day.

Yahooid #542"

Tasdik · Post by **Tasdik** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:28 pm

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:29 pm

Yahoo shuts down JM, JM shuts down SRO :banghead:

Innovacious · Post by **Innovacious** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:29 pm

i think its just some random tryign to stir things up

StealMySoda · Post by **StealMySoda** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:29 pm

Is this for real? :shock:

I'd laugh if it is, but I wont believe it until I see it from an actual official source, as I'm pretty sure Yahoo doesn't own ISRO

DarkJackal · Post by **DarkJackal** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:30 pm

Lies?

Website · Post by **satman83** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:30 pm

WOW

and i suppose you would if it great if they just pulled the plug on SRO

Website · Post by **satman83** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:32 pm

lol i think its fake, i cant find the statement anywhere

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:32 pm

MD is onlin ein sro.net, but she isnt deleting the post/topic, and as well all know they delete anything and everything they want.

Innovacious · Post by **Innovacious** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:34 pm

FuryAngle wrote:MD is onlin ein sro.net, but she isnt deleting the post/topic, and as well all know they delete anything and everything they want.

they seem to ignore topics about wong for as long as they can, so they probably havnt seen it yet.

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:34 pm

satman83 wrote:lol i think its fake, i cant find the statement anywhere

its on the WONG thread, last post i think, i can still see the post on there.

Website · Post by **satman83** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:35 pm

WAIT

HAHAHAHA

SO FAKE....lol cant anyone see the stupidity of this....how the f**k can
yahoo sue a company that they own, so what their going to sue themselves.

hahaha, its like when fox news wanted to use the producers of the simpsons...who was fox, :roll:

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:40 pm

post a link or its lies
not just sro forums

[SD]Master_Wong · Post by **[SD]Master_Wong** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:40 pm

they close it down then you guys produce a private server and due to no company nothing wil happen to you for making one

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:41 pm

satman83 wrote:WAIT

HAHAHAHA

SO FAKE....lol cant anyone see the stupidity of this....how the f**k can
yahoo sue a company that they own, so what their going to sue themselves.

hahaha, its like when fox news wanted to use the producers of the simpsons...who was fox,

JM is a sub company that is liscenced under Yahoo. And JM is bringing a bad name to yahoo since Yahoo is the one who "technicaly" has the rights over SRO, ut it does seem fake, the person has a spelling mistake, can you find it!

BlackFox · Post by **BlackFox** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:42 pm

@ FuryAngle Why are you banned realy ??

Is from yours SIG

Greece-80, 73, 69, 80 bannedXD
Babel-(80banned),72,69,68,65

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:42 pm

FuryAngle wrote:JM is a sub company that is liscenced under Yahoo. And JM is bringing a bad name to yahoo since Yahoo is the one who "technicaly" has the rights over SRO,

yahoo only owns the rights to KSRO
i think forgive me if im wrong

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:42 pm

Karlos Vandango wrote:post a link or its lies
not just sro forums

http://www.silkroadonline.net/sro_board/bhboard/bh_postview.asp?ForumID=2&TopicID=8682

might open sro.net main page, but just go to the General Discusion, and go to Wongs thread

Dark0Archer0 · Post by **Dark0Archer0** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:44 pm

FuryAngle wrote:
This is s public notice and will remain on http://www.silkroadonline.net

Where on the Silkroad website is that written?

ciddy · Post by **ciddy** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:44 pm

FuryAngle wrote:this is from the UNBAN MASTER-WONG thread on Sro.net

The term known as bot refers to an automated character which roam the virtual world of SRO. JM and its staff have ingored and have been instructed by its CEO to disregard these illegal activites.

This is interesting...disregard

like lineage 2

lol if it was true....Yahoo will pass the ownership of sro to someone else not shut it down. This may mean monthly payment

or bill gates might buy it and let us play for free and get rid of botter with his banhammer

(my dreams)

Website · Post by **satman83** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:44 pm

HAHA

well if they only own the rights to KSRO then that makes it even more
fake. i say just ignore it...

smegheads

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:44 pm

BlackFox wrote:@ FuryAngle Why are you banned realy ??

Is from yours SIG

Greece-80, 73, 69, 80 bannedXD
Babel-(80banned),72,69,68,65

Went broke, so i charged back, once Euro comes out i will get the chars back. If i feel like it, And one is banned cuz it was my friends from Hanoi, and he gave it to me since Viet ips are blocked, and he used a proxy to play SRO so the char got banned.

Sin · Post by **Sin** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:45 pm

I don't believe it.

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:46 pm

satman83 wrote:
smegheads

Says Rimmer xD

Innovacious · Post by **Innovacious** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:46 pm

Karlos Vandango wrote:
FuryAngle wrote:JM is a sub company that is liscenced under Yahoo. And JM is bringing a bad name to yahoo since Yahoo is the one who "technicaly" has the rights over SRO,

yahoo only owns the rights to KSRO
i think forgive me if im wrong

korean yahoo owns the rights to ksro i believe, lol, i think its kinda like how other companys own rights for csro, tsro ect, if only one of the international yahoos would buy the rights for isro, i bet the game would be much better.

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:01 pm

FuryAngle wrote:
Karlos Vandango wrote:post a link or its lies
not just sro forums
http://www.silkroadonline.net/sro_board/bhboard/bh_postview.asp?ForumID=2&TopicID=8682

might open sro.net main page, but just go to the General Discusion, and go to Wongs thread

i said not on sro link

i want proof of yahoo

Innovacious · Post by **Innovacious** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:02 pm

Karlos Vandango wrote:
FuryAngle wrote:
Karlos Vandango wrote:post a link or its lies
not just sro forums
http://www.silkroadonline.net/sro_board/bhboard/bh_postview.asp?ForumID=2&TopicID=8682

might open sro.net main page, but just go to the General Discusion, and go to Wongs thread

i said not on sro link

i want proof of yahoo

im pretty sure nobody is goign to be able to produce such a link :roll:

FuryAngle · Post by **FuryAngle** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:06 pm

I only saw it on sro.net, under wongs thread, go look on yahoo if u want, or ask on sro.net for a link on yahoo.

Vandango · Post by **Vandango** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:09 pm

FuryAngle wrote:this is from the UNBAN MASTER-WONG thread on Sro.net

" A class lawsuit is curently being filed against Joymax by its parent company. Yahoo, currently under the belief that Joymax and its staff are running their corparation under false pretenses, and false advertisments. This in general being MMOMassive MultiPLAYER onlineGrammer Mistakes. Their current devision known as SRO is being mis-advertised. The general public which is playing in corespondance with the ToS is being abused. While the Illegal activites are being disregarded for the sake of income/revenue.
The term known as bot refers to an automated character which roam the virtual world of These EXCAT WORDS have been used in another ArticleSRO. JM and its staff have ingored and have been instructed by its CEO to disregard these illegal activites. To what extend and for what porpose seems all too obvious, bots increse and amount for over 70 of all income generated by SRO and its affiliates.

This is s public notice and will remain on http://www.silkroadonline.net , aswell the head office is being notified as I write this notice.

Wrongfull bans such as 5 recent bans which occoured within a 1 week period will be investigated promtly.

Thank you for reading this, and enjoy your day.

Red = Mistake
Blue = My Comment
Green = Text Chat (Not used in a formal news post)
Also The Word Silkroad Online IS Never Mentioned Only SRO

Yahooid #542"

dman · Post by **dman** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 pm

omg, Just lets wong goes in peace...dang...it's like hes the best of the best of the best of the best of the best legit out there....

:banghead:

Silkroad Online Forums

Yahoo suing Joymax?

Yahoo suing Joymax?

Re: Yahoo suing Joymax?

Re: Yahoo suing Joymax?

Re: Yahoo suing Joymax?

Re: Yahoo suing Joymax?