Page 1 of 1

a BOT in ITEM MALL ??

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:10 pm
by pimproad
- At the beginning, there was no item mall at all.
- Then joymax added the item mall, players could pay for :
a monkey that picks up ur drops.
a 60% or 100% xp 3 hours a day.
pots, arrows, repair hammer.
lots of different scrolls (res, rev return, instant scroll, 20% def, 20% atk)
- Then joymax added Immortal and Astral to item mall to make +5 and up alchemy easier.

Since Joymax doesnt take care of botters for X, Y and Z reasons...
and since botting has become a huge "problem" in SRO.
Should joymax add a "auto-grind" feature (a bot) to the item mall ?

I dont want to promote botting but lets say 50% is for botting and the other 50% is against botting.

what dou think of it ?


HINT: before starting to flame. just think about gay marriage, if 50% is for it and 50% is against it, what would u do if u were the one "making the laws" (in that case, Joymax)?

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:13 pm
by ---Rev---
are you taking the p1ss I mean come on think before you type please It would help the rest of us :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:14 pm
by Alfred
...

why not pay and get fully farmed character at the lvl cap

:banghead:

NO.

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:14 pm
by Chaby
No. They should make p2p bot servers, at let us normal people play without them.

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:27 pm
by LadyOphelia
As SG once said.. the servers would explode! :shock: And not in a good "big bang theory" kinda way.. no, no happy endings in that story.

I vote no because I love to grind ride horse hunt theif trade union guild freinds stall chat lag scream pvp npc alchemy res wolf try to pwn zerk get pwned auto pot lol quests ferries uniques lvl up...

And all that jazz!


... out of breath! Whew :P

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:30 pm
by [SD]Twysta
I agree with chaby

Why don't they make bot servers, pay 10$ to bot a week or something. And make normal servers for the legits.

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:33 pm
by hellsharpt
Not going to discuss it.