Page 1 of 1

Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:29 am
by Vaya
What's the amount of elixirs that can get me to +5 with like 90% chance.
I know it's all about luck.
but if you have 20 elixir, you can be sure that you'll get +3 before you finish them.
so how many elixirs for +5?

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:42 am
by apan
I'd say 100, no joke. I've only used 5, or 100. Either it works the first time, or it keeps failing until like 100+, but maybe that's just me? :/

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:50 am
by The Invisible
Spoiler!


Good Luck ....

But I would stop at +3 if i were you .

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:58 am
by apan
So that means that getting a +5 weapon is 0,5% (I calculated it)! Man that's just BS!

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:07 pm
by The Invisible
No it is exactly 2.5% (Recalculate) depending on his success rate .

80 * 2.5% = 2

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 12:23 pm
by apan
Okey I recalculated but I got ~3%

How did you calculate?

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:19 pm
by Vaya
so 127 elixir * 600,000 gold = 76,200,000 gold
Well, +5 weapon that sell for more than that is 9D, so it doesn't worth trying on lower weapons :/

very useful spreadsheet.

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:11 pm
by Goseki
It's really random. I've personally spent over 500 wep elixirs on my old 9d sos sword only to only go up to +4.

I've also spent 5 elixirs and made my nova necklace +5.

Re: Alchemy

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:19 pm
by SneakyBanana
It is all random luck, I made my nova cleric rod +7 without any fails from +0.

I just played it smart, went from +0 to +4 then left it until the next day, went +5.

Kept it +5 until the server inspection, went +6 and then kept it +6 until fortress, after fortress I went +7.


On the other hand, I got my egy staff +7 first try without a fail and then when I went +8 and failed, getting it back to +5 was a nightmare. I think I used 1.2b on elixirs at 900k each before it went +5, after +5 it went straight to +9 the way I said above.