Silkroad Online Forums

Anyone else think it should be made impossible for Warriors to fence each other? I understand Warriors fencing other people, but a party of Warriors fencing each other with a cleric healing is just insane. The only way to kill them would be to wipe out the ENTIRE party at once... that just seems messed up.

Anyone else thinks a char with warrior skills should be an invalid target for fencing/pain?

Would be a great idea.

~sincerly,
a rogue

nowhere near as op as viewing wizzards in invis....
thank joymax that you have some defence!

Um... no shiny my old friend, I don't think so. I remember hanging out the front of DW pwning turks like that, was too much fun.

And if I get back to playing, I would need it as the bonghead would get so rapped now, I'd need all the help I could get lolz.

Bonghead.

Lol. It is overkill though. Killing a wiz, rogue, or even a chn char in fence is one thing. Killing a Warrior that is fenced is hella hard. Specially if there's even more warriors.


It's one thing to be strong, it's another to just be overkill. And now that almost half the server is warrior/cleric. Shit's boring and annoying.

There that many warrior/clerics now? Wow, I remember getting called a noob for making bonghead warrior/cleric when euro came out.

But yeah I do see your point, there should be some "balance" to the game. Man I really need to get my PC up and running again, can't wait to get pwned buy turks lolz.

Plus all this new shit that has been put in the game in the last few years, I'd really like to see it.

Bonghead.

Just imagine a bunch of pixels that cost Thousands of dollars... Pretty much sums it up. lulz.

Here's some pics to show you what you've missed m8te.

Joymax won't change it .

Since when you are able to buff certain people only .

So if someone gets warrior to level 8 (example) just for the knock back , he won't be able to get buffed with fences , would be annoying (specially in parties) if it is pure int with low level warrior and it can't be buffed .

What's the big deal? Just nuke the fenced warrior until the other warrior dies with fence dmg. Shouldn't be that hard since the other warrior will get like 60-70% of the damage.

Seriously there are harder opponents than warriors fencing each other, but if that's already a problem for you....

Kronos wrote:What's the big deal? Just nuke the fenced warrior until the other warrior dies with fence dmg. Shouldn't be that hard since the other warrior will get like 60-70% of the damage.

Seriously there are harder opponents than warriors fencing each other, but if that's already a problem for you....

fence =/= PQ..this comment is irrelevant.

Nice bling you have yourself there shin, nice indeed.

penfold1992 wrote:

Kronos wrote:What's the big deal? Just nuke the fenced warrior until the other warrior dies with fence dmg. Shouldn't be that hard since the other warrior will get like 60-70% of the damage.

Seriously there are harder opponents than warriors fencing each other, but if that's already a problem for you....

fence =/= PQ..this comment is irrelevant.

Actualy its not Pq in a 2 man party is the same as fences and both are silly things to do and will do more harm then good tbh

penfold1992 wrote:

Kronos wrote:What's the big deal? Just nuke the fenced warrior until the other warrior dies with fence dmg. Shouldn't be that hard since the other warrior will get like 60-70% of the damage.

Seriously there are harder opponents than warriors fencing each other, but if that's already a problem for you....

fence =/= PQ..this comment is irrelevant.

No, it's not. I noticed that they were talking about fence and not PQ. Still that one, who uses the fence will get like 60-70% of the dmg. at lv.90+. That should be enough to get him killed, if you just nuke the fenced ppl as hard as you can.

Warriors are tanks. They are suppose to be nearly immortal.