Page 1 of 2

Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:38 am
by Dbett5
If you havent looked there is a new defense against bots with an impossible beat monster that hopefully bots will attack and get owned it also attacks people when they come too close to it youll be warned so there shouldnt be any bullshit obviously the problem with this is that it wont keep the bots out of the server just kill them alot but it should force the non company bots to just get annoyed and stop personally i think itll still be funny as shit to see them get owned haha

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:47 am
by .curve
.curve wrote:Seems like an easy fix. Program bots to not target those mob names, profit.


Taken from the other thread.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:48 am
by Dbett5
well i looked so sorry i didnt see it-.- and can everyone get over the theory that joymax let this happen on purpose no they dont

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:49 am
by Pan_Raider(`_´)
.curve wrote:
.curve wrote:Seems like an easy fix. Program bots to not target those mob names, profit.


Taken from the other thread.


quoted for +1 post

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:52 am
by KylieMinogue
Code: Select all

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:53 am
by Dbett5
Pan_Raider(`_´) wrote:
.curve wrote:
.curve wrote:Seems like an easy fix. Program bots to not target those mob names, profit.


Taken from the other thread.


quoted for +1 post


hm good for you

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:57 am
by Pan_Raider(`_´)
KylieMinogue wrote:Code: Select all


even normal goldbots can circumvent that system :soosad:

walk slightly further north or south and they are past

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:23 am
by DinoNuggets
it doesnt really help cause bots can just die and res in town, we need them to leave servers so it can be populated atleast.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
by Dbett5
DinoNuggets wrote:it doesnt really help cause bots can just die and res in town, we need them to leave servers so it can be populated atleast.

lol read my whole post thats what i said mate :P

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:15 am
by PR0METHEUS
Like others have said, it won't stop them. If these mobs do have warnings that come up when you get too close, then apparently Joymax doesn't want legitimate players dieing to this mob. It's for the bots. Bot programmers will just code the software to go around the mob and not attack it.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:57 am
by William-CL
KylieMinogue wrote:Code: Select all

Omfg I hope they read the
- Do NOT kill these monsters because these will give you only 1 EXP and these are for bots only.
- If your character is killed by the Statue of Justice, your account can be blocked for using illegal program.

from the main site..

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:58 am
by Pan_Raider(`_´)
i doubt they'll do it in the first few days,
especially not silkbuyers lol, for all we know they're automatically walking the same paths out of town as well.
would mean selfdestruct by the next bot ban rofl

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:15 pm
by Dbett5
cant you guys try be a little more optimistic when these sought of things happen the fact that they are going to be banning people who dye by them might actually do something worthwhile before the gold bots get programmed different

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:25 pm
by Xawkes
Image

And this happen minutes ago. Now they are at West Gate of Jan,South Gate of Sama (Xian Serve)

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:55 pm
by majincooler
Xawkes wrote:Image

And this happen minutes ago. Now they are at West Gate of Jan,South Gate of Sama (Xian Serve)


Probably just for GNGWC. Bots will bypass it > will be useless > dont care anymore and carry on.

Anyways, I loled at the world "legitimate act" Joymax and legitimate can't coexist in one sentence. :roll:

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:03 pm
by Goseki
I personally and a shitload of other ppl from every guild in the game has tried to tank these mobs. Pretty fun. I lasted for 5 hits than died >_<

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:30 pm
by sn1kzZe
I tanked the shit out of it...than just got bored :s

but anyway people already found good use for it, dlvling their farmers instead of going to flowers.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:33 pm
by Goseki
sn1kzZe wrote:I tanked the shit out of it...than just got bored :s

but anyway people already found good use for it, dlvling their farmers instead of going to flowers.


I'm pretty sure because of how close they placed them to the city, pvping ppl will die. However, I'm pretty sure JM has it set so that if you die for x amount of time during y period, you'll get banned. Delvling using them = bad idea.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:34 pm
by Deathsythe
Thanks Joymax for ruining pvp, every fcking turk warrior and bower on the server is going pink on people and spamming knockback on people into these mobs. Already died 4 times trying to have a normal pvp.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:38 pm
by Goseki
Deathsythe wrote:Thanks Joymax for ruining pvp, every fcking turk warrior and bower on the server is going pink on people and spamming knockback on people into these mobs. Already died 4 times trying to have a normal pvp.


Lol send em a complain email thing. Pretty sure they'll be pushed further out from the city if enough ppl complain. Prob just in smk.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:41 pm
by _Equal_
Deathsythe wrote:Thanks Joymax for ruining pvp, every fcking turk warrior and bower on the server is going pink on people and spamming knockback on people into these mobs. Already died 4 times trying to have a normal pvp.


the only "normal" pvp I have does not take place at S Samarkand ^_^

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:07 pm
by ZaKnighT
^ true ++ don't start bitchin about it... It's the only good thing joymax did. Battle arena comming soon any way

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:34 pm
by Xawkes
For those who dont have imagination and think that Gold Bots can avoid it easy.

Image

This was posted on rev6 by babee0 not me.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:05 pm
by monmon33
am at hotan west and there are 4 in 1 spot and they are raping all the bots there. (Xian)

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:58 pm
by HuNt3rMx
If it is real that the mobs can be switched from place to place by the GM's then it is good, as soon as the bots programmers updates their walk paths, the mob will be already moving and boom, bots keep dieing and thus pissing off goldbot companies, i hope so...

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:48 pm
by devxcil
Man I'm loving this! I can log in anywhere and the fields are free for grinding! Lets hope they keeps this up :) I might even be able to get some friends to join now

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:27 pm
by Fortune
Im would be suprised if this is gonna work.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:25 pm
by Hades
PR0METHEUS wrote:Like others have said, it won't stop them. If these mobs do have warnings that come up when you get too close, then apparently Joymax doesn't want legitimate players dieing to this mob. It's for the bots. Bot programmers will just code the software to go around the mob and not attack it.


Its already done.

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:38 pm
by William-CL
Server population is still the same today =] Awesome

Re: Silkroad might have done a legitimate act against bots

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 2:06 pm
by Swindler
I laugh at everyone that get their hopes up each time joymax does something to prevent bots, it always ends with Joymax doesn't really give a shit and those people who falled for it saying "I will never trust them again"

I pity the fools who fall for it, I do.