Silkroad Online Forums

Now that Silkroad Guard is updating.
Let see how this work out.
My prediction.

1) IF Silkroad Guard works and botters get banned.
It will be disabled by JM within 2 mths.

2) Silkroad Guard got bypassed by most 3rd parth software. Render useless.

Discuss.

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

+1 like always ... they give us some hope but in the end , Joymax only thinks about $$$$$$$$

I think it's cute people think a Game Guard/ Hack Shield will stop Clientless bot's from logging in.

Intersting

Tsume wrote:Intersting

+1
Unfortunately it will be option 2, as always...
Joymax just loves money...

Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

intersting indeed

Prediction ?

We already know what will happen.

Goldbots will bring a sexy back.

Anyone who think else is an idiot

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots...

As long as it keeps the MAJORITY of the bots out for at least a few days it'll already be a big improvement compared to what JM has been doing for the past year.

Although i have to say that moving to HackShield was a horrible idea, considering their security system is one of the most bypassed in FPS games.

curvekiller wrote:

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots...

What's wrong with that? That just gives Joymax less types of bots to detect and ban. Ban most of them, everyone copies the working ones, then ban 30,000 copies of the same 2 or 3 bots.

Wash, rinse, repeat until all bot types are detected and eliminated.

Sure, new bot types will be created, but they will be easier to identify than the initial 15 types or whatever it is.

Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

Maybe its because botters are scared to login....
You wouldnt want to lose your account, even if you use bots!

And yes it is intersting

So far most bots are working, only thing thats not working is clientless.
It won't be long till they bypass that security check.

Let's hope for good updates next inspection...

Heosphoros wrote:Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy

Intersting, very intersting.

This is support to be free to play game!

sn1kzZe wrote:

Heosphoros wrote:Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy

It was a serious question since everyone was saying intersting. I wasn't trying to be a wiseguy. I'm sorry i ment to type "suppose" but you still got the idea, its an isolated incident, wheras "intersting" was seen multiple times, which peaked me to ask if that is how its really spelt, since, afaik, the search button on the all mighty google is to hard for me to find.

Honey, we just wrote it that way because of the topic title

intersting if this goes on I might play again.. oh nvm. come on we all know JM too well.