Page 1 of 2
JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:54 pm
by marijnz0r
Bot punishment list:
1st: 572 accounts
2nd: 145 accounts
3rd: 26 accounts
It looks to me like they are actually doing something...
Let's hope they will keep on going and even more punishments on daily base!
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:55 pm
by pr0klobster
Seen it before, I won't hold my breath that they will continue.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:12 pm
by TheKnight
Is there any proofs that those guys are actually banned?
In kSro they said they banned bots and then unbanned at the end of the day -.-"
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:13 pm
by CeLL
is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:24 pm
by Gladiator_RN
Joymax is never gonna ban the silk buying bots, believe me. Not permanently. They might try to ban all these gold bots but they will come back anyway.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:28 pm
by fckerr
Fake or real bans,there isnt any result in server traffic.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:08 pm
by Strwarrior
ofy1993 wrote:"Those who cannot learn from history are bound to repeat it."
Don't get your hopes up. Use the search button.
Honestly, no kidding, read the history in Srf. You will learn a lot from it about how Joymax "bans" bots.
+1, i still remember these days when we was saying "omg 80k bots banned", now they are 500...
there is no difference, those who got banned are those stupids who use wrong opcodes.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:46 pm
by aishsharma
the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"
but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:56 pm
by curvekiller
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:07 pm
by CeLL
curvekiller wrote:CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so
Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an
effect on somebody or something
so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:07 pm
by Strwarrior
aishsharma wrote:the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"
but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already
lol
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:30 pm
by curvekiller
CeLL wrote:curvekiller wrote:CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?
Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.
OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so
Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an
effect on somebody or something
so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.
Yes, you can say "Is there any proof they still lay or that this will affect them?", too.
Btw, i'm from Germany
and currently in the US as an exchange student lol.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:40 pm
by Barotix
I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:57 pm
by CeLL
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:19 pm
by .AWAKE.
CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
my thoughts exactly..
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:24 pm
by majincooler
.AWAKE. wrote:CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
my thoughts exactly..
There isn't a community anymore. Don't you see it's the same 10-15 users posting in almost all the topics? Silkroad is dead, hence these forums are dead. If MOD can show us statistics about how many posts, topics, registered users per day go through Silkroad-related sections, I m pretty sure you ll be convinced, or atleast know that its nowhere near how it was before.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:28 pm
by .AWAKE.
that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:31 pm
by majincooler
.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said
the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:42 pm
by dom
Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:43 pm
by curvekiller
dom wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1
omagawd, all the mods hate us
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:44 pm
by CeLL
majincooler wrote:.AWAKE. wrote:that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..
I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said
the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.
i didnt make it look like anyhthing, that is simply how you precieved it. it doesnt matter if it were 5 people, its still a little rude.
and @ AWAKE they have otl dont forget.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:50 pm
by dom
curvekiller wrote:dom wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
+1
omagawd, all the mods hate us
http://pan-am.uniserve.com/pg000005.htm
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:52 pm
by curvekiller
Still want to kill me?
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:55 pm
by dom
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:01 pm
by TheKnight
dom wrote:
Thats just like my pet rabbit, died 1 year ago
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:04 pm
by curvekiller
Edit: My pet died 1 year ago, too
.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
by Swindler
Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:09 pm
by TheKnight
HejsaN wrote:Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny
hmm...maybe we should go back to topic itself indeed...
Moar bunnys!
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:13 pm
by Barotix
CeLL wrote:Barotix wrote:I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.
thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.
np, anytime broski.
Re: JoyMax banning
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:36 am
by PR0METHEUS
CeLL wrote:is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?
+1. I'll start believing it more when active leaders of big botting guilds are banned permanently. I'll really know something GREAT is happening when entire botting guilds, or even 2/3rds, are banned from a server.