Lol JM

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
Post Reply
User avatar
XxDeeDeeDeexX
Active Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:51 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Lol JM

Post by XxDeeDeeDeexX »

Image
Well, they've done it again. Now they are giving DHYHUT and MJNkjnhb a three strike chance to stop botting. Oh lawdy, when will JM's hilarity end.
Spoiler!
Image

User avatar
William-CL
Forum Legend
Posts: 7363
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:10 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: N/A

Re: Lol JM

Post by William-CL »

Well it just means it'll take 3 ban's instead of 1? lol
Image

User avatar
Strwarrior
Veteran Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ....

Re: Lol JM

Post by Strwarrior »

Blackdragon6 wrote:Well it just means it'll take 3 ban's instead of 1? lol

3 working bans is bettter than 1 fake ban
Image

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa

User avatar
Goseki
Veteran Member
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:45 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Alps

Re: Lol JM

Post by Goseki »

Strwarrior wrote:
Blackdragon6 wrote:Well it just means it'll take 3 ban's instead of 1? lol

3 working bans is bettter than 1 fake ban


Cept they can't even get the 1 ban to work right, now they're gonna do it 3 times? Sooo triple fail?

BTW, already thread on this... http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=114578&start=0

Also, I imagine this will be like the past years. GNGWC, giant ban lists in the 10k-50k per week. Than die off and stop again. First bans won't happen until they release the roc update most likely. Soon after, it will just be the usual no more bots banned. Also, I doubt they will try any new programming technique, they obviously don't want gameguard's help. I highly doubt the staff will be logging on anytime soon and using their eyes to find bots. Prob just be an automated ban, aka gold bots.
.curve wrote:Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.

Image
Image
Spoiler!

User avatar
XxDeeDeeDeexX
Active Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:51 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Re: Lol JM

Post by XxDeeDeeDeexX »

Whoops, didnt see it down there xD
Oh well, this can be deleted/locked/merged if needed.
I still think its kinda funny that JM is now giving them multiple attempts.
Image

User avatar
Strwarrior
Veteran Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:41 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ....

Re: Lol JM

Post by Strwarrior »

well.. if that bot system worked well.. so why not 3 bans? better than one ban and it doesnt work.
Image

HUUU MADE THIS SIG?? Amarisa

User avatar
Disconn3cted
Veteran Member
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: WV, USA

Re: Lol JM

Post by Disconn3cted »

Giving gold bots 3 chances is stupid. They should make it so only silk buyers get 3 tries and then they can go back to the way they did it last year with almost 50k bots banned each week. They can easily detect and ban bots but the bots come back because they automated the account creation system.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”