Page 1 of 2
For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:35 pm
by bloody
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:41 pm
by asusi
i like it,, i want to see you fight when your 100

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:43 pm
by bloody
asusi wrote:i like it,, i want to see you fight when your 100

im not that guy :S ^^
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:46 pm
by Amarisa
lol that music annoyed me a little... otherwise it was fine. no one said nukers fail it just takes more skill then spamming 1341341341341341234134. now nukers are 434343434343 and 0 every 2 min XD
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:54 pm
by Green Tea
Its now, reach 100 lvl , then u will have problems with mp !

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:05 pm
by Fyron
I didnt know that Nukers used hauksal(or what it is called) attacks
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:33 pm
by reLaxx`
That rogue in the beginning was awful.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:34 pm
by Amro
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:10 pm
by GimmeMo
reLaxx` wrote:That rogue in the beginning was awful.
that crit..

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:19 pm
by reLaxx`
GimmeMo wrote:reLaxx` wrote:That rogue in the beginning was awful.
that crit..

Which one?
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:40 pm
by BaronSengir
that was pretty cool go mmo_doug
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:51 pm
by HuNt3rMx
Nukers arent a phail, Nukers with sun piece and sun spear gettin killed by a non sun ARe a real phail....btw the first kill on the warrior was an overkill hahahaha got killed by imbue overtime dmg hahaha.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:55 pm
by warfire6395
only a couple euro pvps and you picked the worst euros. other then that your enemies are all bad, except glenford. try beating a real euro aka _Czar. and if u rlly want hit me up Sinister87, and ill pvp u.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:02 am
by BuDo
Nukers are indeed a fail when it comes to pvp...except within the 2 precious minutes they now have because of snow shield. He had his snow shield on with nearly every opponent.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:05 am
by katip:pPp
BuDo wrote:Nukers are indeed a fail when it comes to pvp...except within the 2 precious minutes they now have because of snow shield. He had his snow shield on with nearly every opponent.
lol its like saying a cleric using bless is a fail, a warrior using skins is a fail, a blader using kd is a fail.. wth
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:15 am
by w00t
agree on post above, ages ago people always nagged on ice bowers. Crying about that it would be unfair of having ranged attacks + slowing / freezing.
Stop nagging he is using the games skills. The skills are included in the game live with it.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:17 am
by BuDo
I wasn't nagging/crying despite what you thought. I merely pointing out how nukers have to rely wholeheartedly and entirely on snow shield to put up a good fight in a 1v1 duel. Without that skill (snow shield) they are hopeless. Most other builds are not totally dependent on a single skill to keep them alive.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:24 am
by JBerlyn
BuDo wrote:I wasn't nagging/crying despite what you thought. I merely pointing out how nukers have to rely wholeheartedly and entirely on snow shield to put up a good fight in a 1v1 duel. Without that skill (snow shield) they are hopeless. Most other builds are not totally dependent on a single skill to keep them alive.
Are you for real? Every build in the dame has a skill they have to rely on to actually do well in PvP. Think about an important skill a character uses in 1v1 PvP, then disallow them from using it.
To be honest, it's like taking physical attacks from a Glavier or Blader and calling them fail if they use their imbue to cause more damage.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:43 am
by Majorharper
warfire6395 wrote:only a couple euro pvps and you picked the worst euros. other then that your enemies are all bad, except glenford. try beating a real euro aka _Czar. and if u rlly want hit me up Sinister87, and ill pvp u.
Sorry, but im an experienced bower, and Glendford was awful to me, no knock back, only skill that can save your life, no fire wall, nothing to win basically...
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:46 am
by Insanity
bladers no kd = fail
glaivers no kb = fail
bowers no kb = fail
nukers no snow = fail
wiz no bless = fail
warrior no skins = fail
so umh, u gonna complain about all those other skills too? or just snow?
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:02 am
by JBerlyn
Insanity wrote:bladers no kd = fail
glaivers no kb = fail
bowers no kb = fail
nukers no snow = fail
wiz no bless = fail
warrior no skins = fail
so umh, u gonna complain about all those other skills too? or just snow?
You are win.

+1
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:04 am
by Amarisa
nukers are full of win until they run out of snow shield then they need to be a hybrid XD
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:03 am
by TillTheEnd
bloody wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3rx3Cj4iw
Discuss Pl0x

they are...
lvl 100 glavier/bower/blader vs int
Requirement: lvl 100 same Premium, minimum +5 garm/prot set, vigors,20 ice, purification pills
Goal: wait for nuker to start his snow, spam purification pills when 2 stats land, division+bleed ect, spam vigors, use 20% snow, if kd switch to shield, if very low hp firewall+vigors, wait for his snow+iron wall to end = winnar
if you are pure str and did the above mention and still die= delete ur character, something is very wrong with it.
an int character has never kill me. non sun weapon, untested vs +9 or higher sword/spear
I stand by this till the day an int character can kill me.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:13 am
by JBerlyn
TillTheEnd wrote:bloody wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3rx3Cj4iw
Discuss Pl0x

they are...
lvl 100 glavier/bower/blader vs int
Requirement: lvl 100 same Premium, minimum +5 garm/prot set, vigors,20 ice, purification pills
Goal: wait for nuker to start his snow, spam purification pills when 2 stats land, division+bleed ect, spam vigors, use 20% snow, if kd switch to shield, if very low hp firewall+vigors, wait for his snow+iron wall to end = winnar
if you are pure str and did the above mention and still die= delete ur character, something is very wrong with it.
an int character has never kill me. non sun weapon, untested vs +9 or higher sword/spear
I stand by this till the day an int character
can kill me.
So INT Nukers aren't fail. You just admitted it.

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:25 am
by TillTheEnd
JBerlyn wrote:TillTheEnd wrote:bloody wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3rx3Cj4iw
Discuss Pl0x

they are...
lvl 100 glavier/bower/blader vs int
Requirement: lvl 100 same Premium, minimum +5 garm/prot set, vigors,20 ice, purification pills
Goal: wait for nuker to start his snow, spam purification pills when 2 stats land, division+bleed ect, spam vigors, use 20% snow, if kd switch to shield, if very low hp firewall+vigors, wait for his snow+iron wall to end = winnar
if you are pure str and did the above mention and still die= delete ur character, something is very wrong with it.
an int character has never kill me. non sun weapon, untested vs +9 or higher sword/spear
I stand by this
till the day an int character
can kill me.
So INT Nukers aren't fail. You just admitted it.


Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:28 am
by JBerlyn
TillTheEnd wrote:an int character can kill me.
That bit made me assume that you think INT characters are good.

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:37 am
by NuclearSilo
Any str chinese can kill a pure int

Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:45 am
by warfire6395
JBerlyn wrote:TillTheEnd wrote:an int character can kill me.
That bit made me assume that you think INT characters are good.

let me do what ur doing..
characters are good.

what? NO? pets r the best.
sarcasm.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:51 am
by JBerlyn
The word can and the word can't are completely different.
It is frustrating when idiotic Asians (and other cultures) mistake the two.
Re: For those who say that Nukers are a fail.
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:03 am
by Amarisa
JBerlyn wrote:The word can and the word can't are completely different.
It is frustrating when idiotic Asians (and other cultures) mistake the two.
i don't know about you but it makes perfect sense
"I stand by this till the day an int character can kill me."
it means he will say nukers suck until they kill him ill break it up for you
I stand by this
he stands by his opinion of nukers suck.
till
till...
the day an int character can kill me.
the day if/when a nuker will kill him.
put what i said together
he stands by his opinion of nukers suck. till... the day if/when a nuker will kill him.
its simple English but yet hard to explain.
now if he said "I stand by this till the day an int character
can't kill me." that would mean nukers can kill him and they do not suck.