just cant stop laughing at something retarded like that lol
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:39 pm
by zShared
That's what happens when you know shit all about the game
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:45 pm
by warfire6395
haha thats my guild right there
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:54 pm
by Pan_Raider(`_ยด)
lol, the bank wins again
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:58 pm
by XesoS
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA i can not stop laughing ..... Selfish pr*ck sox wasnt good enough for Mr . lol
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:01 pm
by xKingpinx
Why didnt he put immortal? Was he quitting and didnt care? Or just plain fcking stupid
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:04 pm
by katip:pPp
xKingpinx wrote:Why didnt he put immortal? Was he quitting and didnt care? Or just plain fcking stupid
he is quitting now after that happened. i've heard he asked a friend yesterday about the use of immortal, the friend explained him it prevents the destroy of the item; the reply was something like "its too expensive and i dont need it"
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:28 pm
by TheSlink
katip:pPp wrote:
xKingpinx wrote:Why didnt he put immortal? Was he quitting and didnt care? Or just plain fcking stupid
he is quitting now after that happened. i've heard he asked a friend yesterday about the use of immortal, the friend explained him it prevents the destroy of the item; the reply was something like "its too expensive and i dont need it"
Lmao..
Or like most people, they believe SoX and ESPECIALLY account bond items are UN-DESTROYABLE.. I few guys have tried previous and faced severse consequences.. but they didnt fail as hard as this dumb ass.
He utterly deserved what he got.
Joymax 1 Wizard 0
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:11 am
by Nick Invaders
That guy puts the epic in epic fail.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:13 am
by TheSlink
Nick Invaders wrote:That guy puts the epic in epic fail.
Also, adds the FU back in alchemy
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:58 am
by XxDeeDeeDeexX
What a dingus, why can't anybody be satisfied with +5 -_-, I mean its already SUN... 90+5SUN=120 Staff, whereas a 98+7 is only 105...What a greedy bastard.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:07 am
by Furious
XxDeeDeeDeexX wrote:What a dingus, why can't anybody be satisfied with +5 -_-, I mean its already SUN... 90+5SUN=120 Staff, whereas a 98+7 is only 105...What a greedy bastard.
sun+5 = 110
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:34 am
by XxDeeDeeDeexX
Where is my brain tonight >_< I cant concentrate after 3 1/2 hours of speech class. Either way. I think 110 is more than enough.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:36 am
by CrimsonNuker
Its retarded and funny cause hes playing SRO.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:26 am
by Toshiharu
katip:pPp wrote:
xKingpinx wrote:Why didnt he put immortal? Was he quitting and didnt care? Or just plain fcking stupid
he is quitting now after that happened. i've heard he asked a friend yesterday about the use of immortal, the friend explained him it prevents the destroy of the item; the reply was something like "its too expensive and i dont need it"
lol'd
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:10 am
by ilililil
I look at it as False Advertisement. Correct me if I am wrong here, but didn't morningdew say,
Seal items can not be destroyed?
I have never tested this myself because I never wanted to risk it. A player in Troy did the same thing LindaJane. It sucks because ppl used real $$$ on these items. I can understand why the person would quit... I have failed many +8's trying to go to +9 it makes you sick sometimes. In the end though at least it is only a game.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:32 am
by GimmeMo
What a waste
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:44 am
by lopasas
ok ok ok, i thought, he will fail, and that he will drop the sos, but seems its an acc binded sun BHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH ROFL!!!!!!!! PWNT!!!!!OLOLOLOOL
nope, i wanna know what kind of idiot would try his sun +7 or whatever, a 10D SUN without the immortal or something that prevents breaking lol
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:23 am
by Boiler
hahaha pwned
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:48 am
by Amro
LMAO what a retard! imo he made it because i ksed him with 98+3 staff at medusa xD ^^ im in this video btw -> amrooo has logged off xD
btw more ppl on greece should do this.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:54 am
by _sr972_
in the vid he wrote "ich mach jetzt +6 ohne immo :S" what means "i now make +6 w/o immo :S"
So this jerk knew about the meaning of immo. So.. Selfpwn3d. Idiot.
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:55 am
by XMoshe
XxDeeDeeDeexX wrote:Where is my brain tonight >_< I cant concentrate after 3 1/2 hours of speech class. Either way. I think 110 is more than enough.
Yeah already 5 lvl's higher dmg...And around 7 lvl's higher reinforce. It's more than enough. But tbh, I would +7 a Sun for sure >.<
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:05 pm
by katip:pPp
_sr972_ wrote:in the vid he wrote "ich mach jetzt +6 ohne immo :S" what means "i now make +6 w/o immo :S"
So this jerk knew about the meaning of immo. So.. Selfpwn3d. Idiot.
he thought immo was a sort of help or whatever. he didnt get what it exactly does.. i dont even think he knew items can get destroyed that way
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:06 pm
by Hideoki
HAHA!!!!! OMG, that dude mustve been pissed. what was it? +5, i couldnt tell as the text was tiny lol
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:43 pm
by trane
Happend to someone on Troy too , lindajane. She spammed some k's of silk when magic pop was implemented won. Then after a while she thought to try +7 and she failed and the item poofed xD
Re: FAIL
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:00 pm
by Mindy
trane wrote:Happend to someone on Troy too , lindajane. She spammed some k's of silk when magic pop was implemented won. Then after a while she thought to try +7 and she failed and the item poofed xD