Silkroad Online Forums

Hi All

Just checkin up on good ol' SRO if anything "changed". For some reason i had the urge to check out whats new in the SRO world and so far i can only get as far as the Login and Pass selection..........which still hasn't changed .

More bots? More servers? More stupid BS? More bots?

tbh thats the about the 5th thread that someone is asking for this

way , way, wayyyyyyyyYYYYYY more bots
worst traffic ever

yes and an impossible 100cap to reach
and autologin from many bots
stupid events witch doesnt make any sense at all
just joymax earning more and more money

and u forgot the fact that u can now buy sun sets/weapons ingame for silk, u just need a lil luck

this topic will rock! lol

ow and yeah... a lot have changed... its mutch more worser just try another sro version like ECSRO or Csro

YES

if u want real sro, go play tsro, believe me, u can expierence what real sro is when ur playin tsro

HolyPure wrote:and u forgot the fact that u can now buy sun sets/weapons ingame for silk, u just need a lil luck

this topic will rock! lol

ow and yeah... a lot have changed... its much more worser :D just try another sro version like ECSRO or Csro

No need long speech,just long at this bold text.

Edited.

SwordCloud wrote:

HolyPure wrote:and u forgot the fact that u can now buy sun sets/weapons ingame for silk, u just need a lil luck

this topic will rock! lol

ow and yeah... a lot have changed... its much more worser :D just try another sro version like ECSRO or Csro

No need long speech,just loog at this bold text.

No need long speech,just loog at this bold text.

^ loled

SwordCloud wrote:

HolyPure wrote:and u forgot the fact that u can now buy sun sets/weapons ingame for silk, u just need a lil luck

this topic will rock! lol

ow and yeah... a lot have changed... its much more worser :D just try another sro version like ECSRO or Csro

No need long speech,just long at this bold text.

Edited.

wow....
I mean the first time is forgivable, but you failed an edit to fix your fail.
fail at failing, no that's not a double negative.

I'll fix it for you, it should read:

"No need for a long speech, just look at this bold text."

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112283&p=1551305#p1551305

nothing changed on oasis, but apparently avalon took it back on Venus!! Grats noops. After only 36 min of hard battle we took back the fortress. Thanks to everyone that showed up. Leaders log on tomarrow for fortress gold! Did not expect that, I guess they really are as strong as they've been sayin...

You fail.
I can also search all you spelling mistakes sir,also i can ask you to try to speak my own language,let see if you don't do spelling mistake

SwordCloud wrote:http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112283&p=1551305#p1551305

nothing changed on oasis, but apparently avalon took it back on Venus!! Grats noops. After only 36 min of hard battle we took back the fortress. Thanks to everyone that showed up. Leaders log on tomarrow for fortress gold! Did not expect that, I guess they really are as strong as they've been sayin...

You fail.
I can also search all you spelling mistakes sir,also i can ask you to try to speak my own language,let see if you don't do spelling mistake

Fly wrote that quote.. not me, fail x3.

also, your sentence should read:
"I can also search for all your spelling mistakes, sir. Also, I can ask you to try to speak my own language then we could see if you don't make any spelling mistakes. "

zShared wrote:

SwordCloud wrote:http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=112283&p=1551305#p1551305

nothing changed on oasis, but apparently avalon took it back on Venus!! Grats noops. After only 36 min of hard battle we took back the fortress. Thanks to everyone that showed up. Leaders log on tomarrow for fortress gold! Did not expect that, I guess they really are as strong as they've been sayin...

You fail.
I can also search all you spelling mistakes sir,also i can ask you to try to speak my own language,let see if you don't do spelling mistake

Fly wrote that quote.. not me, fail x3.

also, your sentence should read:
"I can also search for all your spelling mistakes, sir. Also, I can ask you to try to speak my own language then we could see if you don't make any spelling mistakes. "

Ok +1 for you,gratz,now want to try with my language?it's easier for an american or an english.
Ah you can't only because you don't know others languages,also if you are so rude with spelling mistakes,grammar etc.. let's go?

Fly wrote that quote... Not me, fail x3.

I don't even want to watch you others posts you forgot a lot of things(, . CAPITAL etc...).
trolling for spelling mistakes omagad..

ITT: why do people care about spell checks and grammar so much?

voltis5 wrote:ITT: why do people care about spell checks and grammar so much?

bicuz, sir, thei tink tey r gods

and Bravo! to this thread.

voltis5 wrote:ITT: why do people care about spell checks and grammar so much?

it is easier to read. When the brain encounters a word with a familiar letter combo, it can easily skip past it, knowing what is said. But if it is written incorrectly, you have to actually read the entire word letter by letter, or if grammatical, try to decipher what is being said.

Or just to be a dick.

The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

actually the game couldnt be better...
we get daily events from GM's..
bots are rarer then suns now
you no longer have to purchase silk , just go to there website and they give it to you now.
and the server capactiy has been increased to 10,000 so you get first try logins whenever.

Now is the perfect time to return to silkroad

lilly_ wrote:The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

Creepy.

lilly_ wrote:The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

I read something like that somewhere. I'm guessing you got it from the Encyclopedia of Immaturity?

lilly_ wrote:The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

i was actually able to read that paragraph in one take

I still can't get passed the Login and Pass window well i guess i'll wait another year or 2 to try to get back in the game

GO GA....ERR JOYMAX!!!!!!!!!

nickinvaders wrote:

lilly_ wrote:The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

I read something like that somewhere. I'm guessing you got it from the Encyclopedia of Immaturity?

It was one of those chain msgs that your meant to forward if your able to read it >.>, i got it from my friends sometime ago

nickinvaders wrote:

lilly_ wrote:The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

I read something like that somewhere. I'm guessing you got it from the Encyclopedia of Immaturity?

I saw this on OTL lol

Topic is full of fail.

This forum is a cesspool of grammar mistakes. It is pointless to sit here and try to correct every single one.

The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

Though this ugly sentence is easily comprehensible, it is irrelevant, as the issue is grammar, which, not only arguably excludes spelling, but also relies on the order in which words are presented, as well as the matter in which they are presented.

This will not work.
Will this not work?


Notice, the first is a statement in which the explanation of the possibility of something succeeding is dismissed, whereas the other asks if the possibility of something succeeding can be dismissed. To further the example, we can then purposely make a mistake by "innocently" replacing the question mark with a period, thus only adding to the confusion.

Will this not work.

Now, watch the first sentence and how the meaning then changes again when made into a question.

This will not work?

Which is now questioning someone's previous statement, whereas it could have been interpreted as agreement with a period.

Also, though your example works, that person looks profoundly stupid, and, like word choice, this presentation will probably effect the gravity of your point in the human mind.

Too much weed.

Nin wrote:
Though this ugly sentence is easily comprehensible, it is irrelevant, as the issue is grammar, which, not only arguably excludes spelling, but also relies on the order in which words are presented, as well as the matter in which they are presented.

This will not work.
Will this not work?


Notice, the first is a statement in which the explanation of the possibility of something succeeding is dismissed, whereas the other asks if the possibility of something succeeding can be dismissed. To further the example, we can then purposely make a mistake by "innocently" replacing the question mark with a period, thus only adding to the confusion.

Will this not work.

Now, watch the first sentence and how the meaning then changes again when made into a question.

This will not work?

Which is now questioning someone's previous statement, whereas it could have been interpreted as agreement with a period.

Also, though your example works, that person looks profoundly stupid, and, like word choice, this presentation will probably effect the gravity of your point in the human mind.

Lol, your whole post seems kinda irrelevant to me, no offense xD

Someone obviously trying too hard =.=

Nin wrote:
Though this ugly sentence is easily comprehensible, it is irrelevant, as the issue is grammar, which, not only arguably excludes spelling, but also relies on the order in which words are presented, as well as the matter in which they are presented.

If you mean the small paragraph i posted, the whole thing started cuz HolyPure made a small spelling mistake...lol

and i don't really get your post , i get your concept, but what are you tryin to apply it to? =.="

lilly_ wrote:
If you mean the small paragraph i posted, the whole thing started cuz HolyPure made a small spelling mistake...lol

Improper word usage is grammatical.

and i don't really get your post , i get your concept , but what are you tryin to apply it to? =.="

Language in general; the reason why people care about grammar and the differences between spelling and grammar.

Nin wrote:

lilly_ wrote:
If you mean the small paragraph i posted, the whole thing started cuz HolyPure made a small spelling mistake...lol

Improper word usage is grammatical.

Lol, think we're looking at different posts xD, but i was sure it started from here :p

HolyPure wrote:ow and yeah... a lot have changed... its mutch more worser just try another sro version like ECSRO or Csro

Mutch is not a word, and for additional info, worser is not one either xD, can't be improper word usage, if the words don't exist, so i'm pretty sure it's more logical to take it as a spelling error/typo