Page 1 of 1
RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:36 am
by zShared
So I just read on another forum that RedBlueGreen got banned from here. All he said was because he was trying to help someone get unbanned... Why is he banned? What exactly did he do?
How many others are there that just get banned and I guess they just fade away until noone really remembers them? We know who gets banned in EB.. why shouldn't / can't we know who gets banned? :|
At least post the reason why under their names so if we see an old thread we would know..
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:55 am
by _MvP_
All the good people went from this forum...
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:56 am
by NuclearSilo
I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:17 am
by zShared
NuclearSilo wrote:I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."
these people have been banned without it being in their sigs.. and this is just from what I remember.. I guess there's many more.
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15757memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=38476memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=45294notice the last visit.. and this thread on the other forum;
http://forum.rev6.com/Silkroad-Online-G ... t3272.html
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:18 am
by nohunta
Meh SRF is falling.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:41 am
by Rip Tide
Wow that sucks, didnt even notice him not around
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:50 am
by Blindfire
Only SG, Ryoko or Key-J can edit signatures. The bans now are being down by global mods and they can't edit signatures.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:00 am
by selenne
well, amalie got banned and didnt get that sig too.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:02 am
by Hennessey
nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:30 am
by selenne
Hennessey wrote:nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.
legits are falling.
now in olympus we're just enough to fill a guild up. maybe.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:32 am
by Insanity
aww i liked RedBlueGreen and Mousetrap...
it might be time to reconsider the no-tolerance policy before this forum ends up like the tavern.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:37 am
by Sacchin
selenne wrote:legits are falling.
*sro and^
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 3:06 am
by Mirosuke
oh noezz...
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 3:14 am
by Toshiharu
If no one noticed, Red = _SomeOne_
Never mentioned anything, because I actually prefer having people on the forums... =/
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 4:09 am
by fckerr
That thread there is really interesting imo.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 5:07 am
by HawaiianMix
I don't know why you actually care. Majority of the people bot and if they get banned, they'll just make another account.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:01 am
by Doppleganger
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:05 am
by _MvP_
Insanity wrote:aww i liked RedBlueGreen and Mousetrap...
it might be time to reconsider the no-tolerance policy before this forum ends up like the tavern.
It will end up like tavern, mostly cuz of mods and theyre policy..
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:31 am
by Toasty
nohunta wrote:Meh SRF is falling.
Ah well, enjoy SRF while you still can.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:42 am
by SwordCloud
I heard that the first guy pissed off a moderator,he got banned for that.
Now i think the mod was pissed off and Red defend the one who pissed off the mod,so I think everything is fine.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:43 am
by Puma60
I agree, SRF is falling. Right now this forums is close to dead. Roughly 2 topics a day started in General Discussion. Im sure it could have been 5+ a day if all those bots weren't banned. The Exposed Botters section ruined this forums. I couldn't name more than 5 legits players Lvl 90+ in Rome, the majority of legits being level 1-40 that havn't yet discovered the bot. It makes me wonder, how many members on this forums are actually legit like they say they are.
I can't find the topic, but earlier this month someone made a topic/poll asking how many people botted. If I can remember correctly, about 60% of these forums admitted to botting in the poll. Now imagine if you reached your goal of banning every botter on here. You would be left with about 40% of the community, most of which have quit already (just posting in Off Topic Lounge) or inexperienced low levels.
Anyway, this topic is most likely going to be locked sinces Mod's wont want to face the reality.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:52 am
by Toasty
Puma60 wrote:I agree, SRF is falling. Right now this forums is close to dead. Roughly 2 topics a day started in General Discussion. Im sure it could have been 5+ a day if all those bots weren't banned. The Exposed Botters section ruined this forums. I couldn't name more than 5 legits players Lvl 90+ in Rome, the majority of legits being level 1-40 that havn't yet discovered the bot. It makes me wonder, how many members on this forums are actually legit like they say they are.
I can't find the topic, but earlier this month someone made a topic/poll asking how many people botted. If I can remember correctly, about 60% of these forums admitted to botting in the poll. Now imagine if you reached your goal of banning every botter on here. You would be left with about 40% of the community, most of which have quit already (just posting in Off Topic Lounge) or inexperienced low levels.
Anyway, this topic is most likely going to be locked sinces Mod's wont want to face the reality.
Barely anyone would be left. Most of the legits who do still play have already left for another forum or been banned.
The mods probably know they did wrong by making the EB, but they cant change their mind now. It was SRF's members fault anyway. We all asked for a way to punish bots, and we got it.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:54 am
by Rosato
I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:04 am
by AznFury
Rosato wrote:I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?
not a fun one?
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:59 am
by _MvP_
aznfury91 wrote:Rosato wrote:I like the idea of banning bots from the forums but banning people for saying there opinion or trying to get someone unbanned is just stupid. What kind of communist government is this?
not a fun one?
Thats for sure.
Re: RedBlueGreen and others.
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:37 pm
by RuYi
NuclearSilo wrote:I don't think so. If he is banned, he'd have a sig "banned..."
That was months ago, when SG was still active. There are plans for a 'banned' title for each banned member, but that might take a while.
For all you care bears, RedBlueGreen was banned because he posted someone else's account information.
We have a set or rules here, many of which
YOU, the community, demanded, and now you got them.
Anyone breaking them will face the consequences, no matter how much you cry.
If you guys are really think we ban people just because we don't like their tone or attitude, then I severely overestimated your intelligence.
For if that was the case, I would have banned
a lot more people.
This is how it is, it's not up for discussion.
Don't like it? Leave.