Page 1 of 2

Nivlam ?

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:33 pm
by whorelock
its down again :(

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:34 pm
by aznronin
it's working, from what i just saw, they got a cool news section of sro too

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:36 pm
by Sleepy
Jeez where have you been.... he sold the code to IGL and rev6 and there's one on both sites now. Rev6's is better ofc =p

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:33 pm
by huejas
Sleepy wrote:Jeez where have you been.... he sold the code to IGL and rev6 and there's one on both sites now. Rev6's is better ofc =p

why to yu say that?

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:39 pm
by LaloHao
huejas wrote:
Sleepy wrote:Jeez where have you been.... he sold the code to IGL and rev6 and there's one on both sites now. Rev6's is better ofc =p

why to yu say that?

i sense someone is going to say that it's because rev6 makes a bot and IGL is legit and he is now going to be called a botter

so?

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:41 pm
by Blurred
He's right thou, it is better. lol.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:06 pm
by Belgarath
That's funny. In my opinion, IGL's is much better. It houses more information and runs faster.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:13 pm
by Tasdik
I say we fight over it. That always helps things.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:42 pm
by OnlyMe
huejas wrote:
Sleepy wrote:Jeez where have you been.... he sold the code to IGL and rev6 and there's one on both sites now. Rev6's is better ofc =p

why to yu say that?

No huge background that has to load 100 years before u can start browsing :P But they got nice other tools. Like the stolen FW tablet etc :) I prefer rev6, clean and fast!

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:48 pm
by Cruor
OnlyMe wrote:No huge background that has to load 100 years before u can start browsing :P But they got nice other tools. Like the stolen FW tablet etc :) I prefer rev6, clean and fast!
Use whichever one you think is better, but stop spreading irrational lies. The desktop functions just fine while the background is loading, and the pictures present on this page you are viewing right now are almost double the size of the background. Past the basic format, nothing was taken for the fortress war listings, as "you know who" did an excellent job of gathering the data. That page is database-driven anyway, so it's not like we just copy/pasted.

Regardless, I think it's a good thing that there is competition, because now we've got something to fight for.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:51 pm
by NuclearSilo
Why don't you just change the background anyway? ~.~
Not so hard

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:22 pm
by Cruor
NuclearSilo wrote:Why don't you just change the background anyway? ~.~
Not so hard
..Or we could just cache it for a year. Yeah, I think that's the solution. Done.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:34 am
by deathtoall
the page loads faster at IGL, and loads more completely, and they made it their own, in a sense. Not copy over an exact replica of nivlam's. Plus rev6 is dirty. and hey, thats the most dettering factor

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:01 am
by .curve
deathtoall wrote:the page loads faster at IGL, and loads more completely, and they made it their own, in a sense. Not copy over an exact replica of nivlam's. Plus rev6 is dirty. and hey, thats the most dettering factor


Rev6's loads way faster for me. An exact replica is good. I was used to the way nivlam was laid out. Now that it's the same over at Rev6, it's greatness. <3 Rev6 for that.

Edit:
Oh, and their background picture is badass.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:26 am
by /Pi
"Oh em gee, IGL loads a second late! Whatever shall I do?"

Go Q.Q somewhere else.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:34 am
by Cruor
Prophet Izaach wrote:"Oh em gee, IGL loads a second late! Whatever shall I do?"

Go Q.Q somewhere else.
The funny thing is that Rev6's background picture actually has a larger file size.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:42 am
by .curve
Prophet Izaach wrote:"Oh em gee, IGL loads a second late! Whatever shall I do?"

Go Q.Q somewhere else.


Who is QQing? Seems like you're QQing that people are choosing Rev6 over IGL.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:04 am
by /Pi
.curve wrote:Who is QQing? Seems like you're QQing that people are choosing Rev6 over IGL.


Oh I'm sorry. Did my statement hurt you? Just pretend it's not there, and try not to add it as one of the factors for your pathetic personal vendetta against one community.

Now go on fervently praising every anti-Venus bandwagon like you always love to do. Such a circus always leaves me entertained.

:love:

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:05 am
by dorkus
my website has more hits than yours!
no wai! mine loads faster!
Image

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:07 am
by lightthesky
Instead of just babbling out random information, how about going and comparing both?

*blah blah blah babble babble babble*


So the choice is clear. Support a half-assed, copied, bot website or support a well maintained, clean, original work of art. Choice is yours.

<<Indeed it is. Banned for remaking a banned account. Get back to that perfect IGL of yours and stay off SRF. I'm sure we have cooties. - Ru>>

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:16 am
by .curve
Prophet Izaach wrote:
.curve wrote:Who is QQing? Seems like you're QQing that people are choosing Rev6 over IGL.


Oh I'm sorry. Did my statement hurt you? Just pretend it's not there, and try not to add it as one of the factors for your pathetic personal vendetta against one community.

Now go on fervently praising every anti-Venus bandwagon like you always love to do. Such a circus always leaves me entertained.

:love:


Not at all actually. I don't play the game, thus have no reason to visit either site. I simply did a check on both for features, looks, usability, all that jazz. Obviously with a bit of a bias towards Rev6. Don't be angry that I chose Rev6 over IGL's.

I suppose you missed the thread where Belgarath and I had a great, civilized discussion. I don't hop on any bandwagons. I give respect where it's deserved. Rev6 got it in this case.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:21 am
by .curve
lightthesky wrote:
.curve wrote:Not at all actually. I don't play the game, thus have no reason to visit either site. I simply did a check on both for features, looks, usability, all that jazz. Obviously with a bit of a bias towards Rev6. Don't be angry that I chose Rev6 over IGL's.

I suppose you missed the thread where Belgarath and I had a great, civilized discussion. I don't hop on any bandwagons. I give respect where it's deserved. Rev6 got it in this case.


What features, looks, usabilities, and all that jazz does rev6 have over IGL's? You must have been blinded by that traumatizing background or something, because I can't seen to see anything. The only supposed benefit that it could have in some peoples minds is that its a bot site, which they can relate to. Other than that IGL seems to win over in every category.


Familiarity. I went to nivlam all the time way back when I played. Plus, that background is hawt.

I do find it ironic that Rev6 is labeled as just a "bot site" when it becomes competition to IGL.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:22 am
by /Pi
.curve wrote:Not at all actually. I don't play the game, thus have no reason to visit either site. I simply did a check on both for features, looks, usability, all that jazz. Obviously with a bit of a bias towards Rev6. Don't be angry that I chose Rev6 over IGL's.

I suppose you missed the thread where Belgarath and I had a great, civilized discussion. I don't hop on any bandwagons. I give respect where it's deserved. Rev6 got it in this case.


Why, of course you don't hop on any bandwagons, because obviously, Rev6's "strong hate for igamelegit" is never a factor.

As always, you never fail me.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:25 am
by .curve
Prophet Izaach wrote:
.curve wrote:Not at all actually. I don't play the game, thus have no reason to visit either site. I simply did a check on both for features, looks, usability, all that jazz. Obviously with a bit of a bias towards Rev6. Don't be angry that I chose Rev6 over IGL's.

I suppose you missed the thread where Belgarath and I had a great, civilized discussion. I don't hop on any bandwagons. I give respect where it's deserved. Rev6 got it in this case.


Why, of course you don't hop on any bandwagons, because obviously, Rev6's "strong hate for igamelegit" is never a factor.

As always, you never fail me.


Rev6's strong hate for IGL has nothing to do with it. I didn't even know Rev6 hated IGL.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:27 am
by /Pi
Oh silly me. I must have mistaken you for someone else.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:28 am
by lightthesky
.curve wrote:Familiarity. I went to nivlam all the time way back when I played. Plus, that background is hawt.

I do find it ironic that Rev6 is labeled as just a "bot site" when it becomes competition to IGL.


So you choose Familiarity over compatibility, usability, accessibility, creativity, originality, enhanced features? If thats the case, then I'll respect that. Familiarity is always useful. I mean, why fɥck a nice brunette when you can fɥck the same festering, disease ridden goat you've been fɥcking for the last 5 years?

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:29 am
by .curve
Prophet Izaach wrote:Oh silly me. I must have mistaken you for someone else.


Silly you, I knew you would try to pull that out. Check the wording there.

I didn't say due to Rev6's strong hate for IGL. I said due to a strong hate for IGL.
A strong hate for IGL implies that it is a strong hate generated by me.

lightthesky wrote:
.curve wrote:Familiarity. I went to nivlam all the time way back when I played. Plus, that background is hawt.

I do find it ironic that Rev6 is labeled as just a "bot site" when it becomes competition to IGL.


So you choose Familiarity over compatibility, usability, accessibility, creativity, originality, enhanced features? If thats the case, then I'll respect that. Familiarity is always useful. I mean, why fɥck a nice brunette when you can fɥck the same festering, disease ridden goat you've been fɥcking for the last 5 years?


With familiarity comes compatibility, usability, accessibility. Creativity, originality, and enhanced features don't make my overall goal of calculating my SP any easier. Just makes it look prettier.

And to answer the last question...Is that disease ridden, festering goat a blonde? With a good personality? That matters. We're not all materialistic whores around here.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:32 am
by Fury
lightthesky wrote:
.curve wrote:Familiarity. I went to nivlam all the time way back when I played. Plus, that background is hawt.

I do find it ironic that Rev6 is labeled as just a "bot site" when it becomes competition to IGL.


So you choose Familiarity over compatibility, usability, accessibility, creativity, originality, enhanced features? If thats the case, then I'll respect that. Familiarity is always useful. I mean, why fɥck a nice brunette when you can fɥck the same festering, disease ridden goat you've been fɥcking for the last 5 years?

Stop QQ'ing cos some1 likes rev6 over IGL. Its their opinion stfu.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:36 am
by /Pi
.curve wrote:Silly you, I knew you would try to pull that out. Check the wording there.

I didn't say due to Rev6's strong hate for IGL. I said due to a strong hate for IGL.
A strong hate for IGL implies that it is a strong hate generated by me.


"my" would fit perfectly than "a". "a" is never a possessive form and never implies possession. You need to check your wording, not I.

Regardless, I stand by my words.

Re: Nivlam ?

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:42 am
by .curve
Prophet Izaach wrote:
.curve wrote:Silly you, I knew you would try to pull that out. Check the wording there.

I didn't say due to Rev6's strong hate for IGL. I said due to a strong hate for IGL.
A strong hate for IGL implies that it is a strong hate generated by me.


"my" would fit perfectly than "a". "a" is never a possessive form and never implies possession. You need to check your wording, not I.

Regardless, I stand by my words.


You are correct in saying that 'a' does not imply possession. On the contrary to 'my' though, I could have used 'their' or "it's" to imply Rev6's possession.