Page 1 of 1
Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:35 pm
by BladeSkillz
I'm making a new character for fun; a force nuker.
Question is should I go fire or light?
The two options I was thinking of are:
Fire 90, Cold 90, Force 90, Light 30 (at 100 cap light 0)
or
Light 90, Cold 90, Force 90
I know that for 90 cap I don't really need light maxed to 90 since 40 is still good enough to get a decent magical damage increase buff. However, will I need the buff after level 100? Will I still do more damage using fire nukes with no buff over light nukes with max buff?
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:37 pm
by Entangle
Bicheon 90, Light 90 and Ice 90.
Best nuker build imho.
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:45 pm
by BladeSkillz
Honestly, do I really need to say don't recommend I choose a weapon mastery...
I'm making a "fun" build. It doesn't have to be the best character in the god damn server.
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:48 pm
by JcNieto
the one ewith force would be interesting bc of the debuffs but you would have prblems with holyword and the other one is for only damage
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:55 pm
by Stress
90 cap:
90 fire
90 force
60 light
60 cold
100 cap:
100 fire
100 force
60 cold
40 light

Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:00 pm
by the_wicked
first is total pvp. However you don't need fire at all. No phys attacks, high mag def to boot.
force will improve your build.
You will have more MP to tank better in snow, high phys def from ice, and the force debuffs will allow you to kill any non-cleric builds.
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:28 pm
by Snoopy
Build I'd consider strongest. Cold 90, Fire 90, Heuksal 90, Light 30. Spear ofc.
I just like spears, for Bicheon.
Bicheon 90, Fire 90, Light 60, Cold 60. dunno why, and in protector.
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:40 pm
by GoogleVsYahoo
i find it funny that most of the people posting are not answering his question..
and btw that build is not fun.. debuff nuke nuke debuff nuke nuke ect..is not fun, after snow shield has run out ur dead..
i find nukers with a weapon mastery more fun than that.. cause u still have debuffs(sword mastery) and u still have nukes.. u also have a phy defs buff, u can use that after snow shield runs out, u also have KD and a higher % of blocking..
but if u must know which is stonger it would be 90force 90light 90ice 30fire(fire shield buff)... because why would u need more mag attack dmg if u can debuff the hell outta them..
thats my view on it
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:45 pm
by Mousetrap
wrong section,
and he wants a force nuker, one without a weapon tree so I don't know why people are suggesting.
Go 90 force/ ice/ light and 30 fire.
You should be able to kill most chinese builds with your force debuffs, against a euro str with cleric sub you aren't going to kill him as a pure nuker either way so fire doesn't matter (if they know how to play at least)
(darn, someone else beat me to it)
Re: Which would be stronger?
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:05 pm
by Barotix
C&S is that way =>>