Page 1 of 3
Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:02 pm
by [SD]Kratos
So how was FW on ur server guys? who won?
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:38 pm
by Guardia
Yeah, we're well guarded this time.

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:43 pm
by snowcloud
Did no one seriusly turn up for the war on venus?
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:57 pm
by XesoS
Zeus : It was Shittest worst FW ever !!!!! . Mortis still has it . BC and Wazzup Attacked Eachother not even try to work together lol . so what u think . and ofcourse Mortis is one powerful union so ..
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:19 pm
by Tasdik
Guardia wrote:Yeah, we're well guarded this time.

Lol nice

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:48 pm
by XesoS
Who Won on EoS ?
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:55 pm
by F-22
reborn won on rome server! we took it back!!!!!
Congratz to all that came to the FW.....and congratz to my union.

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:59 pm
by WarItUp
Immortal won again on Odin. It takes place too early for me to participate.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:16 pm
by Infect
First Fortress i have ever been to and our union blitzed the Fortress in under 30minutes lol.
It was absolutely amazing, makes me wanna go every week

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:17 pm
by AkillerNXC
I slept in. Obviously didn't miss anything. 2 guilds signed up against us on venus...not a single bot guild =)
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:24 pm
by XesoS
AkillerNXC wrote:I slept in. Obviously didn't miss anything. 2 guilds signed up against us on venus...not a single bot guild =)
lol ... "hope Avolon didnt lose it" -.-
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:28 pm
by Infect
Infect wrote:
We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Since when is babysitting considered legit?
I'm sorry when in my statement did i ever say that babysitting was considered legit?
So.. die

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:32 pm
by Ramidux
_Wazzup_ still occupies FW on Xian
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:36 pm
by Lubim1Osobku
On hera Predators won, it was fun seeing the globals
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:52 pm
by asusi
lol at venus

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:58 pm
by Nyx
Running around with Guardia putting up obstacles <3
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:07 pm
by Bg_DrEaM
We started pretty good at Eldorado, but when we were at the guard towers everyone was running around and we didn't manage to take them down in time. I have to admit Hayal union is good. But i don;t think good enough to keep it after 2 weeks. Only 1 full uni was attaking, from my uni it was only 3ABEPA and 1 more guild and _Europeans_ without uni... so not so many attackers, next 2 weeks we will take them down from their throne.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:27 pm
by nightbloom
I confess that I fell asleep in my chair at FW this week.
Fly had to wake me up and send me to bed.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:04 pm
by PR0METHEUS
Infect wrote:Infect wrote:
We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Since when is babysitting considered legit?
I'm sorry when in my statement did i ever say that babysitting was considered legit?
So.. die

So in other words, your guild is full of players that are either legit, or bots that babysit. That's still a bot guild, no matter what way you look at it. If you yourself don't bot, you're still supporting bots by being in that guild, which is against the rules of these forums.
Banhammer?
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:18 pm
by pr0klobster
PR0METHEUS wrote:Infect wrote:Infect wrote:
We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Since when is babysitting considered legit?
I'm sorry when in my statement did i ever say that babysitting was considered legit?
So.. die

So in other words, your guild is full of players that are either legit, or bots that babysit. That's still a bot guild, no matter what way you look at it. If you yourself don't bot, you're still supporting bots by being in that guild, which is against the rules of these forums.
Banhammer?
How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:41 pm
by PR0METHEUS
pr0klobster wrote:How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
Well I'm not the one who brought it up in the first place, and I guess I shouldn't have responded to it in this thread, but too late for that I guess.
No, Avalon shouldn't be banned because there MIGHT be a bot in it, because that bot would be banned. The guild doesn't support bots. A guild that claims to be legit, but knowingly allows babysitting botters should be banned. Perhaps Infect's guild does ban the babysitters upon discovery, or maybe they accept them. I don't know.
I just wanted to try to clarify my post some. Let's get back on topic shall we?

Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:48 pm
by maykelpachecho
we are talking about the FW dont become this on a bot discussion..
Heroes @ Eos
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:52 pm
by pr0klobster
PR0METHEUS wrote:pr0klobster wrote:How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
Well I'm not the one who brought it up in the first place, and I guess I shouldn't have responded to it in this thread, but too late for that I guess.
No, Avalon shouldn't be banned because there MIGHT be a bot in it, because that bot would be banned. The guild doesn't support bots. A guild that claims to be legit, but knowingly allows babysitting botters should be banned. Perhaps Infect's guild does ban the babysitters upon discovery, or maybe they accept them. I don't know.
I just wanted to try to clarify my post some. Let's get back on topic shall we?

You got it.
Anyone know who won Olympus? I can never play due to the time zone...
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:59 pm
by PR0METHEUS
Hopefully someday I'll be high enough level to actually participate in a fortress war. I went in one time to watch, and died instantly. Sounds like it was pretty uneventful this week in Venus FW.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:18 pm
by Ningyotsukai-san
PR0METHEUS wrote:Sounds like it was pretty uneventful in Venus' FW.
Yea, it's basically been uneventful for the past 3+ FWs...
Got no motivation to log in so early for FW nowadays
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:21 pm
by Argonaut
Infect wrote:We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Woot, new sig.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:28 pm
by _Scarlett_
Think the past 4 FWs have been pretty lame on Venus...the 5th FW ago was the "last stand" of the opposing guilds and unions, or so it seemed. Loved showing up at the front gate and just seeing about 60+ ppl to kill. Last 3 or 4 have basically been: show up then fart around, or go back to sleep lol.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:44 pm
by PR0METHEUS
I'm always awake plenty early for FW, but I leave the house for work before the war starts.
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:54 pm
by chr1s
Game_club lost it on tibet..apocalpyse owns it now and its a full euro guild ^^
Re: Fortress
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:38 pm
by AnacondAX
ArkenStone Union held the fort again on Troy XxX guild.
East and West gates we taken down to about 25% left each.