The part i find funniest is how we have always been nagged, and told, repeatedly, that blah blah percent or number of our forums closet bots, or so and so is a botter, or why do you ban people who stir up shit, but dont touch those that bot.
Now, that we have decided that enough is enough, and done something. Yes, thats right, this was all started by you guys, you guys who complain and protest the closet botters. So now that we have listened to you guys, and done something about it.
Freaking 180. Now we have a load of members, (most of them new, or remakes apparently) who are complaining because we are banning botters.
I've already had to ban 2 people that like, u know, hurt to ban. Yet, i did it because the users have always asked for us to keep SRF legit, and this is the way we are doing it.
SRF
- Vindicator
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:38 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: L-A-B
Re: SRF
Key-J wrote:The part i find funniest is how we have always been nagged, and told, repeatedly, that blah blah percent or number of our forums closet bots, or so and so is a botter, or why do you ban people who stir up shit, but dont touch those that bot.
Now, that we have decided that enough is enough, and done something. Yes, thats right, this was all started by you guys, you guys who complain and protest the closet botters. So now that we have listened to you guys, and done something about it.
Freaking 180. Now we have a load of members, (most of them new, or remakes apparently) who are complaining because we are banning botters.
I've already had to ban 2 people that like, u know, hurt to ban. Yet, i did it because the users have always asked for us to keep SRF legit, and this is the way we are doing it.
Key-J, i respected your commitments, and that of your team to making SRF a better place, but shouldnt be focused on making the community better, not making it pure legit? There is a difference unfortunately. Too many good people have been lost already.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
- TOloseGT
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7129
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:03 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- Contact:
Re: SRF
Vindicator wrote:Key-J, i respected your commitments, and that of your team to making SRF a better place, but shouldnt be focused on making the community better, not making it pure legit? There is a difference unfortunately. Too many good people have been lost already.
they lost it when they started cheating. good people they may be, they don't deserve a spot in srf.


- MrBow
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Playin' Talkin'
Re: SRF
MrBow wrote:These are just the first few days of the Bots exposed subforum. We expected this rush and rage. And, well, if you look at the number of posts over there, the bot issue clearly is a hot item to legit SRF. I think things will become calm next week. We all just have to adapt to the new situation. People naturally don't like change![]()
They are used to their own habits.

Niyoke wrote:err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?
- SuicideGrl
- Retired Admin
- Posts: 8004
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 4:17 pm
- Location: World of Warcraft
Re: SRF
yet another of these threads. i wish you guys would keep it all in one. none of you has anything new to say anyway.

Thx IceCrash for my awesome sig :)
SRF Name Change Policy
Having trouble accessing SRF?
dom wrote:He's from Jersey. Close enough.RuYi wrote:Are you from outer space or something?

