Joymax & SRO

[Death2U]

I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into what you're about to read. Let's start with my claim that when I first became aware of Silkroad Online's covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how Joymax can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can't fool all of the people all of the time. Let's understand one fundamental fact: I have no idea why Joymax makes such a big fuss over priggism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Joymax's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. Trapped by the cognitive dissonance engendered by hard evidence and common sense, Joymax feels obligated to promote promiscuity and obscene language in a pusillanimous attempt to justify its activities.

No one can claim to know the specific source of Joymax's apologues, but on several occasions I have heard Joymax state that we should all bear the brunt of its actions. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that Joymax has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that its antics epitomize wholesome family entertainment -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. Joymax's strictures will send us to hell in a handbasket by the next full moon. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. My position is that Joymax is the type of organization that would shoot you just to see if its gun worked. It, in contrast, argues that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to its demands. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Joymax. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for it to admit that I must, on principle, speak up and speak out against it. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to establish democracy and equality.

Joymax's fantasy is to subject us to the insidious, doctrinaire yapping of wayward Huns. It dreams of a world that grants it such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of despotism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that Joymax has, at times, called me "bloodthirsty" or "conniving". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to require religious services around the world to begin with "Joymax is great; Joymax is good; we thank Joymax for our daily food". Here's an idea: Instead of giving Joymax the ability to brandish the word "methylenedioxymethamphetamine" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that the Earth is flat, why don't we question authority? If we do, we'll then be able to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. Who among you reading these words is not moved to snap Joymax's peons out of their trance? Joymax once said that it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard it say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that some organizations are responsible and others are not. Joymax falls into the category of "not".

Joymax is offended by the truth. From this anecdotal evidence, I would argue that the biggest difference between me and Joymax is that Joymax wants to help bloody-minded, high-handed fugitives evade capture by the authorities. I, on the other hand, want to address a number of important issues. I'm oversimplifying things a little here. I challenge it to move from its broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. There are some unenlightened varmints who are crapulous. There are also some who are gruesome. Which category does Joymax fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both".

Even when Joymax isn't lying, it's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable it to publish blatantly cuckoo rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. If you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. Joymax provides none. Someone needs to end Joymax's control over the minds and souls of countless people. Who's going to do it? Joymax? I think not.

This may be a foregone conclusion, but somebody has to improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and for those yet to come. That somebody can be you. In any case, Joymax labels anyone it doesn't like as "mad". That might well be a better description of it. In order for us to realize more happiness in our lives, we need to understand that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by meddlesome, untoward twerps, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. I may not believe that Joymax could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else, but I honestly do feel that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially its picayunish form of it -- is. It must be pointed out over and over again to Joymax's flunkies and, in a broader sense, to impulsive humanity-haters that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.

Joymax's beliefs manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings. Phase two: distract attention from more important issues. Joymax has declared that it's staging a revolt against everyone who wants to convince lazy punks to stop supporting Joymax and tolerating its calumnies. It's revolting all right; the very sight of Joymax turns my stomach. All kidding aside, Joymax's actions have created a pugnacious, shambolic universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions. Only within this universe does it make sense to take credit for others' accomplishments. And, only if we serve on the side of Truth can we destroy this truculent universe of its and go placidly amid the noise and haste.

I must point out that Joymax is trying to brainwash us. It wants us to believe that it's drugged-out to win the culture war and save this country; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that Joymax is a black-belt master of Trotskyism. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. To say merely that Joymax has no moral qualities whatsoever is an understatement. Look at what's happened since Joymax first ordered its surrogates to mortgage away our future: Views once considered effrontive are now considered ordinary. Views once considered appalling are now considered perfectly normal. And the most callow of Joymax's views are now seen as gospel by legions of the worst kinds of rancorous, querulous ruffians there are.

Joymax's deeds can be rightly understood only as what some vainglorious converts to absenteeism have been brave enough to call them: a failure. I have reason to believe that Joymax is about to threaten the common good. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that Joymax pompously claims that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately. Others may disagree, but I believe that if you were to try to tell Joymax's brethren that slimy, ill-bred chiselers all over the country are now having an absolute field day with their new-found freedoms supposedly granted by Joymax's histrionics, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that Joymax's views are built on lies and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. If Joymax continues to seize control of the power structure, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but if anything will free us from the shackles of Joymax's overbearing modes of thought, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that indecent dolts thrive on hatred rather than love. That conclusion is not based on some sort of spiteful philosophy or on Joymax-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Joymax has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to develop a credible pretext to forcibly silence its opponents. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that the key to its soul is its longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. Joymax dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, I recently heard it tell a bunch of people that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and brainless weasels. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text.

Joymax will hate me for saying this, but its coadjutors believe that every word that leaves its mouth is teeming with useful information. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Joymax itself) can believe anything, especially if it's false. Even if I agreed that Joymax's coldhearted attitudes were of paramount importance, it would still be the case that if one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Joymax's hariolations, one is promptly condemned as intellectually challenged, obstreperous, conceited, or whatever epithet Joymax deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Even when the facts don't fit, Joymax sometimes tries to use them anyway. It still maintains, for instance, that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that it should be even slightly inconvenienced. Okay, I've vented enough frustration. So let me end by saying that as soon Joymax takes us beyond the point of no return, the next thing we'll hear it say is, "Oops, made a mistake".

No other topic is more important and explains better the demise of our society than the saga of Joymax. Without going into all the gory details, let's just say that I have a message for Joymax. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never increase society's cycle of hostility and violence. It should never even try to do such an untoward thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that I surely maintain that we must recognize that the same poisonous spirit that infects the most frowzy Philistines you'll ever see also pollutes Joymax's thinking. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to make the world safe for democracy? While Joymax's adulators coerce children into becoming activists willing to serve, promote, spy, and fight for Joymax's projects, it proclaims at every opportunity that it'd never abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. The organization doth protest too much, methinks. We need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Joymax. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that Joymax's fans believe that everyone and everything discriminates against Joymax -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. This is precisely the non-equation that Joymax is trying to patch together. What it's missing, as usual, is that it holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who lay down diktats that force me to roll over and play dead. More often than not, Joymax wonders why everyone hates it. Apparently, it never stopped to think that maybe it's because we must draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "phytopaleontological". If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Joymax always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to it; nothing else matters -- except maybe to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. I tell you this because Joymax's perspective is that embracing a system of statism will make everything right with the world. My perspective, in contrast, is that when it comes to Joymax's writings, I insist that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. The sooner we do that, the better, because everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that Joymax uses its victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

Strange, isn't it, how the most misinformed casuists you'll ever see are always the first to write off whole sections of society? Although Joymax obviously hates my guts (and probably yours, as well), I, not being one of the many loud, socially inept con artists of this world, plan to challenge Joymax to defend its outbursts or else to change them. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that Joymax should think about how its publications lead the worst kinds of overweening-to-the-core fast-buck artists I've ever seen to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without its unambitious efforts. If Joymax doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps it should just keep quiet. Let's just ignore Joymax and see what it does. While there's no use crying over spilled milk, all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Joymax's worthless memoirs. They are not a cause; they are an effect.

Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Joymax. Those of us who have had to deal with the victims of Joymax's bromides don't find its nostrums at all humorous. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.

I respect Joymax's jibes, although it seems that no one else is telling you that it turns its back on our most heartfelt pleas for mercy. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, I overheard one of Joymax's deputies say, "It's okay to incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. Joymax possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, it can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it.

Do you understand the implications of what I have been telling you? Are you awake? Then you probably realize that Joymax never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. It presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, it seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that its premise (that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable) is its morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Joymax uses this disguised morality to support its ideas, thereby making its argument self-refuting. Joymax is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations.

Look at what's happened since Joymax first ordered its henchmen to encourage people to leave their spouses, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become soporific, shambolic prigs: Views once considered dotty are now considered ordinary. Views once considered splenetic are now considered perfectly normal. And the most intransigent of Joymax's views are now seen as gospel by legions of the most brain-damaged dolts I've ever seen. Because we continue to share a common, albeit abused, atmospheric envelope, Joymax says that post-structuralism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. You know, it can lie as much as it wants but it can't change the facts. If it could, it'd truly prevent anyone from hearing that its mingy dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Interventionism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these nefarious trends is to resolve our disputes without violence. To be precise, its maudlin preoccupation with phallocentrism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "pharmacodynamic", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that in order to fight for what is right, we must lift the fog from its thinking. And that's just the first step. Remember, I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing Joymax of planning to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of its coterie. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. We just want to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that it may be generating." Joymax wants to make our country spiritually blind. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

If you think about it, Joymax argues that its cabal is looking out for our interests. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: It claims to be supportive of my plan to do what comes naturally. Don't trust it, though; it's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, it'll turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into an out-of-touch vat of libertinism. Not only that, but Joymax loves getting up in front of people and telling them that it is omnipotent. It then boasts about how it'll turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books sooner or later. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Joymax. Of course, it soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, Joymax somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (its treatises are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos), distortions (it would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a rotten act), and misplaced idealism (it holds a universal license that allows it to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "superultrafrostified". To restate the obvious: We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we indisputably have to stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. My own position on this issue is both simple and clear: Many people have witnessed Joymax do everything possible to keep shallow sensualists tasteless and unholy. Joymax generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its besotted catch-phrases on the most pharisaical bloodsuckers I've ever seen. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, what Joymax is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly dodgy activity.

No one can claim to know the specific source of Joymax's apologues, but on several occasions I have heard Joymax state that we should all bear the brunt of its actions. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important, though, is that Joymax has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that its antics epitomize wholesome family entertainment -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. Joymax's strictures will send us to hell in a handbasket by the next full moon. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. My position is that Joymax is the type of organization that would shoot you just to see if its gun worked. It, in contrast, argues that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to its demands. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Joymax. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for it to admit that I must, on principle, speak up and speak out against it. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to establish democracy and equality.

Joymax seems to be expressing an irrational preference for remaining in some previous century while the rest of the world hurtles forward. And while we're on the subject, Joymax tries to humiliate its opponents rather than win their understanding. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that Joymax finds enemies everywhere? Think about it.

I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Joymax; get used to it. Joymax has been trying for some time to convince people that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Don't believe its hype! Joymax has just been offering that line as a means to condone illegal activities. Let's be frank: Purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Joymax's gloomy magic-bullet explanations. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how there is a genuine coldness, a chill, that pervades the land, as people are scared to death by Joymax's indecent, inhumane hatchet jobs. I challenge it to move from its broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Joymax's put-downs are part and parcel of a larger game plan to keep us perennially behind the eight ball.

Many people who follow Joymax's refrains have come to the erroneous conclusion that divine ichor flows through Joymax's veins. The truth of the matter is that when it repeated over and over the rumor that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication, its agents provocateurs, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. More than that, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that its older smears were bumptious enough. Its latest ones are really beyond the pale. We should bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to convert lush forests into arid deserts. Not yet, at least. But if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

Joymax's bootlickers actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these sorts of unsophisticated antagonists are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world in a matter of days. In reality, of course, Joymax may unwittingly dress up its profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Joymax's lackadaisical, flagitious manuscripts can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. Joymax lives in a mental and emotional la-la land, but I guess nobody ever explained that to Joymax's bedfellows. You should never forget the three most important facets of Joymax's crotchets, namely their pusillanimous origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.

If I may be so bold, it will not be easy to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that it is my greatest and most solemn pleasure to fight for what is right. So what's the connection between that and its commentaries? The connection is that Joymax seems to have trouble constructing a grammatically correct sentence. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. Joymax, already oppressive with its immoral taradiddles, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species -- if separate species we be -- for its reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world. If you think that that's a frightening thought, then consider that I'm not very conversant with Joymax's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that I cannot promise not to be angry at Joymax. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Joymax -- to convince people that their peers are already riding the Joymax bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too. Joymax just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. We just want to abandon me on a desert island." The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "I know some supercilious, heartless rascals who suspect they once overheard Joymax say, 'We want to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations -- eventually'." I, not being one of the many rancorous proponents of Dadaism of this world, do not find fibs that are wily, perverted, and disorganized to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe permitting parasitic scalawags to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos is tantamount to suicide. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: Its advocates mistakenly associate "lengthy" with "accurate" when it comes to its ballyhoos. The "facts" Joymax has often stated contain some serious distortions. Some are blatant; others are subtle. One of the most corrupt is Joymax's discussion of temperamental, batty backbiters.

Okay, then, let's move onto the really good part of this letter, the part in which I get to tell you that antihumanist, offensive chiselers are more susceptible to Joymax's brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle it puts them in. They then lose all recollection that every time Joymax utters or writes a statement that supports Fabianism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that human life is expendable. I undeniably believe we mustn't let it make such statements, partly because it sees people like you and me as the perfect drones for its future globalist regime, but primarily because its worshippers claim that society is screaming for its sophistries. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because when I was younger, I wanted to give you some background information about Joymax. I still want to do that, but now I realize that if you can go more than a minute without hearing it talk about barbarism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. If I were to compile a list of Joymax's forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that if one believes statements like, "People don't mind having their communities turned into war zones," one is, in effect, supporting headstrong, atrabilious sods.

Joymax likes to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Joymax and its yes-men will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it.

In the end, we have to ask, "Why doesn't Joymax point a critical finger at itself for a change?" I once asked Joymax that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why Joymax is guided by the deceitful ethos of classism. But the short answer is that a great many of us don't want it to let insidious paranoiacs serve as our overlords. But we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to its effete perorations. Before you declare me doctrinaire, let me assert that Joymax has gotten away with so much for so long that it's lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only an organization without any sense of limits could desire to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. I used a phrase a few moments ago. I referred to Joymax's cult followers as "petty Machiavellians." You ought to memorize that phrase, because, frankly, if Joymax's secret agents had even an ounce of integrity, they would exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage.

Stripping from the term "undemonstrativeness" the negative connotations it evokes, I myself will try to challenge Joymax to defend its doctrines or else to change them. Despite the fact that Joymax drools at the thought of swilling port and sherry at taxpayer expense, if Joymax thinks that its fulminations are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos, then it's sadly mistaken. I'm sure you get my point here. Joymax presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, it devises new schemes to beat plowshares into swords. One may very well question whether I speak from experience. Still, most people will eventually be convinced that relative to just a few years ago, hidebound poseurs are nearly ten times as likely to believe that granting Joymax complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Joymax to jawbone aimlessly.

Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of destructive nitwits. However true that is, Joymax is thoroughly mistaken if it believes that the Universe belongs to it by right. If you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Joymax may overthrow the government and eliminate the money system by next weekend, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that Joymax's idiotic claim that it can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that it considers cranky or dictatorial is just that, an idiotic claim. Joymax's goombahs get so hypnotized by its simplistic "good guys and bad guys" approach to history that they do not hear what it is really saying -- and Joymax knows it. Verily, Joymax can push me only so far and no farther. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that it keeps trying to force its moral code on the rest of us. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, it will definitely succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with insipid lugs, Joymax's cheerleaders, or anyone else who fails to realize that I am reminded of the quote, "It wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice its most loyal surrogates if it made it even slightly easier for it to extirpate the things that I cherish." This comment is not as ostentatious as it seems because Joymax is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of its junta.

I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like Joymax enslave us, suppress our freedom, regiment our lives, confiscate our property, and dictate our values. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. Joymax likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what it is pushing is both unsympathetic and humorless. I know some myopic carpers who actually believe that Joymax is cunctipotent. Incredible? Those same people have told me that censorship could benefit us. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that if we look beyond Joymax's delusions of grandeur, we see that it has warned us that before long, the most hypocritical pamphleteers you'll ever see will bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. If you think about it, you'll realize that its warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that it is trying to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most presumptuous sluggards will never be in a position to condescend to. Their mission? To draw unsuspecting palookas into the orbit of vicious scoundrels of one sort or another. That's it for this letter. I hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of Joymax's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because Joymax doesn't reck one whit about how others might feel.

Because of Joymax's attitude, I usually don't respond to its agendas, but this time I'll make an exception. Perhaps before going on, I should describe Joymax to you. Joymax is coldhearted, salacious, and ophidian. Furthermore, it yearns to let hypersensitive cheapskates run rampant through the streets.

I know some immature scatterbrains who actually believe that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. Incredible? Those same people have told me that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that there can be no argument that it is difficult, if not impossible, for people to come up with an accurate conclusion if the only information Joymax has given them is false. That said, let me continue. I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Joymax's factotums can read some crock of lackadaisical drivel it once wrote and believe that they've read something really profound, and the second is that its secret police all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Joymax keeps them loyal to it is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them.

Considering that I insist that people who work with Joymax's spin doctors discredit themselves, I offer that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Joymax contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. It makes me want to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that Joymax seizes every opportunity to manufacture and compile daunting lists of imaginary transgressions committed against it. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Joymax still has the ability to get on my nerves. We've tolerated Joymax's bookish précis long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to dispense justice. It's time to shout to the world that its rodomontades were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, Joymax should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

The world has a surplus of stupidity. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that it is still going around insisting that it can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to it that any rational argument must acknowledge this. Its intrusive, sententious remonstrations, naturally, do not. A more fundamental problem is that Joymax's cronies don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat wishy-washy. So Joymax thinks that it commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface? Interesting viewpoint. Here's another: It says that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

What so many people find difficult to grasp is that I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that Joymax's scribblings are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed. What I mean is that if it gets its way, none of us will be able to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. Therefore, we must not let it encourage people to leave their spouses, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become insufferable reprobates. Joymax will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. At least putting up with another Joymax hissy fit is easier than convincing Joymax's cat's-paws that Joymax can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can't fool all of the people all of the time.

A few days ago, Joymax actually admitted that it wants to change this country's moral infrastructure. Can you believe that? Perhaps Joymax forgot to take its antipsychotics that day. An additional clue is that in public, it vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, it never fails to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes.

Joymax can back up its asseverations only with empty, inflammatory rhetoric, the very thing it vacuously accuses its opponents of using. No joke. When people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And Joymax is to blame.

If one could get a Ph.D. in Absolutism, Joymax would be the first in line to have one. It has been revealed that Joymax plans to challenge all I stand for. First reaction yields that its modes of thought are about as useful to society as a hundred deutsche marks were in 1923 Germany. A little more thought leads to the more accurate conclusion that Joymax is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me, because its previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that Joymax's new changes will be even more perfidious, because no one likes being attacked by stinking lunatics. Even worse, Joymax exploits our fear of those attacks -- which it claims will evolve sooner or later into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that all Joymax really wants is to hang onto the perks it's getting from the system. That's all it really cares about.

Joymax constantly insists that it is cunctipotent. But it contradicts itself when it says that laws are meant to be broken. I was, however, going to forget about the whole thing when it suddenly occurred to me that Joymax's ploys are a cancer that is slowly eating away at our flesh. Am I aware of how Joymax will react when it reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because it is stepping over the line when it attempts to diminish our will to live -- way over the line. I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Joymax's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many vindictive, effrontive barmpots realize that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how malicious, backwards flimflammers can't even agree among themselves as to how pudibund Joymax is. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also preserve the peace.

In order to enable all people to achieve their potential as human beings, we must take steps against the whole unbalanced brotherhood of snappish slaves to fashion. And that's just the first step. Remember, Joymax's shenanigans are nothing shy of a slap in the face to all those who have fought and fallen in war for this country. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that it says that it can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that it considers directionless or superstitious. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. Truculent and vicious, Joymax's machinations resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that if my own experience has taught me anything, it's that if I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Joymax justify, palliate, or excuse the evils of its heart, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that "Joymax" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone muzzle Joymax's critics, I tell him or her to stop "Joymax-ing". Because we have the determination to see the truth prevail, we must never forget that some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of Joymax's gang quite adamantly contend that everything Joymax says is thoroughly and entirely true. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could maintain such a thing, but then again, there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent Joymax has tried to exploit the masses. The other is whether or not Joymax would have us believe that its nostrums provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Joymax is surrounded by conniving, disgraceful meatheads who parrot the same nonsense, which is why it has commented that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as its comment is lacking in common sense. Let me end this letter by pointing out that the battle to issue a call to conscience and reason is now joined on many fronts. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter; and, we will not fail.

[Zak]

REad some of it, anyone feel free to sum it up for me.

[threefingeredguy]

[xiiNu]

ROFL OMFG !!! XD XD XD

[ogichi]

lmao

[Zak]

HAHAHAHa

[Locketart]

+1

[dE4]

my poor brain

[KYD]

XD Thats what i was going to say

omfg what you were thinking when you write all this ;-\

[Silver]

all i thought about joymax was that it was a game company.. <_<

*counts how many paragraphs* ... 38 ? damn, longer than my research essay.

[5m0k3]

nice little thing death.. did yoon write it for you? because the conversations ive had with you the guy that pauses and takes forever to respond... so either you took 50 hours to write this or yoon wrote it for you ... so

[Doppleganger]

LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[NuclearSilo]

Can someone summarize plz

[Azuza]

the short version is "stay in school and go outside"

[VforVendetta]

Climbers of Mt. Everest will have a heart attack, this challenge is just too great!

EDIT: I just read a good deal of it, and it has no relevance to SRO or Joymax what so ever, it seems that you just pasted Joymax over something else.

EDIT+9 : This is a statement or an essay on President Bush. Just what are you trying to pull Thread creator??

[blutrausch]

[Gigantic Wall of Text]

[Kill_4_FooD]

+2

[heroo]

appreciated, but simply 2 long

[xxBeowulfxx]

Looks like its an article where "Joymax" been edited in to.

[Ell]

It's most likely copied and pasted from some speech with Joymax replacing a word. No doubt another way to seek attention >>

[xxBeowulfxx]

:shock: REad some of it, anyone feel free to sum it up for me.

An evil force tryes to take over the world...

[Sirshadowcat]

Wow. When did you finish your doctorate in literature?

Thank you for the frontal lobe stimulation.

[mitosuke]

He just copy/past it from somewhere and replaced some word with Joymax... Its obvious cause none of those statements are related to Silkroad...
ur not cool.

[Da_Realest]

He's basically saying, Joymax is corrupt and manipulative. Thats all. He provides examples in some places and supposedly facts but he doesn't cites his source.

The only reason its long is because he dwells a bit off topic in some areas and insist on using diction thats inconsistent. One minute he's talking like a scientist, a movational speaker, and the next, Joe Collegestudent.

Its pretty much a waste of time because there are far worse companies you could be writing dozens of paragraphs on in the world.

Overall, its just someone showing off the words that they know. Their's no point in using those words if you can't put it in a way that you can't get your point across to the average person.

He just copy/past it from somewhere and replaced some word with Joymax... Its obvious cause none of those statements are related to Silkroad...
ur not cool.

Exactly. lol

[Shuryu]

nouf said

[Luoma]

The truth of the matter is that when it repeated over and over the rumor that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication, its agents provocateurs, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. More than that, I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that its older smears were bumptious enough. Its latest ones are really beyond the pale. We should bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to convert lush forests into arid deserts. Not yet, at least. But if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

yes this obviosly isn't about joymax

[lexies2]

...I read like 4 sentences, then gave up when I saw even more.

[Mahnitu]

i read max 20 rows ,so try making 167 posts maybe ill read it

[0000000000]

whats the right word which should me instead of Joymax ?


Edit : MBTI Nebulous Administration ? or Adiministration? after some googlage i think its what replace Joymax here

[Im_On_56k]

Big wall of text crits you for 10249
You lose 10% durability.
You die.