Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

A place for general discussion about Silkroad Online. Talk about the game or ask questions. Please keep threads Silkroad Online related.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kangaxx
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:40 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Lithuania

Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Kangaxx »

I had this account registered for a long time, but i believe i haven't posted yet. Anyway, i was thinking of creating a Dagger Rogue or a Wizard for my new start. I remember back in the day invisibility pk2 edits were available. Is it still possible to do that? If so, i guess i'll have to roll with something else.

User avatar
Gladiator_RN
SRF Herald
Posts: 2385
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:12 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Gladiator_RN »

It is still possible, but also still not allowed. ( you do have ingame skills also )

However, Rogue is still an awesome, and strong build. (Rogue/cleric)

User avatar
S3by
Active Member
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:10 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Iris

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by S3by »

Since hackshield filter patckets is not avalaible anymore , for now , at CTF , nobody can see me invizible :)
Image

User avatar
Kangaxx
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:40 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Lithuania

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Kangaxx »

I'd hate to derail the thread, but can someone link me to a good rogue/cleric build (it'd nice if it wasn't outdated) and/or a wizard/x build?

User avatar
_Equal_
Loyal Member
Posts: 1771
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:21 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Completely in flux

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by _Equal_ »

Image

iSRO - AsparTame 8x - retired
Salvation - Aspar 70

User avatar
Tasdik
Forum God
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:34 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Life

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Tasdik »

S3by wrote:Since hackshield filter patckets is not avalaible anymore , for now , at CTF , nobody can see me invizible :)

I played like less then a month ago and people were still using the invis hack. Perhaps it has something to do with bot accounts?

User avatar
apan
Active Member
Posts: 956
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:58 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Pluto

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by apan »

Yeah, can be done but it's "illegal" ^^
LV 88 Nuker

LV 92 Blader

JuelzSantana wrote:technically speaking all i need is DOT for dull and wheel bind to kill a chinese char but the other stuff just adds salt to the wounds

im telling i never lose to chinese

edit: and if ur the type to throw up a fire wall or ice wall, i just walk away and sit down lol

User avatar
[Orphen]
Loyal Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:59 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: In your house, stealing your Dew.

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by [Orphen] »

I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?

User avatar
Toasty
Addicted Member
Posts: 2568
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:23 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Venus
Contact:

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Toasty »

Ya, most people will still see you when your invisible.

Dont bother me.. wizzs are stupid enough when you can see them anyway.

User avatar
Gladiator_RN
SRF Herald
Posts: 2385
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:12 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Gladiator_RN »

[Orphen] wrote:I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?


Then count botting, hacking, scamming also as "benefitting yourself"

User avatar
[Orphen]
Loyal Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:59 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: In your house, stealing your Dew.

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by [Orphen] »

Gladiator_RN wrote:
[Orphen] wrote:I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?


Then count botting, hacking, scamming also as "benefitting yourself"

My question still stands, what is the difference? Botting then was illegal, as was hacking and scamming. How is it different now? From the original posts, it almost seems as if the term "illegal" has a double meaning.

I quit during a time when botting was illegal yet common. Back in 06 the word "bot" was taboo. So explain to me what the hell you mean by "illegal."

User avatar
Goseki
Veteran Member
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:45 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Alps

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Goseki »

Considering kSRO is preparing an official bot, and the recent GM stating that they are not allowed to touch silk-buying bots, I think the taboo of bots being bad is slowly fading. It's kinda obvious to see that JM/We are going to work the bot in instead of lowering exp and sp req.

Invisibility-wise, rogues can be seen by bots and hacks. Wizards, normal invs is detected by hacks and bots, but it seems group invisible works the way it's meant to.

Most nubcakes don't know that so they only use the single invisible, then run out and get killed instantly.

In case someone wants to be a prick and point out how do I know all this, not hard if you know how to type and ask ppl, hang out at pvp areas all the time, and play with a wiz/rogue yourself. I've yet to be seen by other ppl when I use group invisible. Get raped every time I use single invisible.
.curve wrote:Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.

Image
Image
Spoiler!

User avatar
Tasdik
Forum God
Posts: 13202
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:34 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Life

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by Tasdik »

I've never actually experienced group invisibility in it's entirety. How many people does it turn invisible? The whole party? If so, why don't more people use it?

This is rather off topic, but meh.

User avatar
[Orphen]
Loyal Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:59 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: In your house, stealing your Dew.

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by [Orphen] »

Tasdik wrote:I've never actually experienced group invisibility in it's entirety. How many people does it turn invisible? The whole party? If so, why don't more people use it?

This is rather off topic, but meh.

Whole party, as long as members are within a certain distance. It's not used as much because the cool down on it is longer than that of the single.

User avatar
William-CL
Forum Legend
Posts: 7363
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:10 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: N/A

Re: Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Post by William-CL »

Goseki wrote:Considering kSRO is preparing an official bot, and the recent GM stating that they are not allowed to touch silk-buying bots, I think the taboo of bots being bad is slowly fading. It's kinda obvious to see that JM/We are going to work the bot in instead of lowering exp and sp req.

Plus that GM is STILL a GM lol..
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Silkroad General Discussion”