Hi,
I just thought of new ring for the game. The ring have some variants. I would like to know what is your opinion.
Version 1: Ring of stars - The ring add 5% to all stats. 10% for ring of moon, and 15% for ring of sun.
* - if the percentages are high, they can be lowerd e.g (2%,4%,6%).
Version 2: Ring of stars (add 5% to INT and STR), 10% for ring of moon, 15% ring of sun.
Best,
Mandrial
Joymax: A new type of Ring: Ring of Stars, Ring of Moon...
-
Vandango
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:23 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
chaud wrote:Makes the people who ccf gold even more powerful! YES!
Congrats Chaud You have Been promoted to Asshole To Noobs
to the actul question
if you mean by the seal things
seal of star is +5 (equlifvent)
seal of moon +10
seal of sun is +15
and besides jaymax (joymax) arent really implemnting other peoples ideas and besides 5% of each stat Thats alot of blues unless you mean by Mg Def and Phy Def which inst very much
Last edited by Vandango on Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
-
stimmedcow
- Active Member
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:20 pm
Karlos Vandango wrote:chaud wrote:Makes the people who ccf gold even more powerful! YES!
Congrats Chaud You have Been promoted to Asshole To Noobs
to the actul question
if you mean by the seal things
I just thought of new ring for the game. The ring have some variants.
I would like to know what is your opinion.
Version 1: Ring of stars - The ring add 5% to all stats. 10% for ring of moon, and 15% for ring of sun.
* - if the percentages are high, they can be lowerd e.g (2%,4%,6%).
Version 2: Ring of stars (add 5% to INT and STR), 10% for ring of moon, 15% ring of sun.
Read before you leap....
I think these rings would be a bad idea for this game, they would be too powerful and create an imbalance. And as Chaud has said, they would end up in the hands of people who can afford to pay the most for them.
-
Vandango
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:23 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
sorry my net connection is on the frits
it took 15 mins to update that post
Reason why i said this comment is when ever someone suggests an idea he is always the first person to think a negtive way about it and its always a new member posting these suggestions
it took 15 mins to update that post
Karlos Vandango wrote:Congrats Chaud You have Been promoted to Asshole To Noobs
Reason why i said this comment is when ever someone suggests an idea he is always the first person to think a negtive way about it and its always a new member posting these suggestions
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
Thanks for your reply.
I see what you are pointing at. However, a ring that will give only (5%) to STR and INT would be powerfull. In addition, the ring will not be upgradable and will not have any mag. or phy. abs. rate. pure enhancement ring.
What do you think now?
Best,
Mandrial
The rise, fall and rise again of alchemy

I see what you are pointing at. However, a ring that will give only (5%) to STR and INT would be powerfull. In addition, the ring will not be upgradable and will not have any mag. or phy. abs. rate. pure enhancement ring.
What do you think now?
Best,
Mandrial
The rise, fall and rise again of alchemy

Karlos Vandango wrote:sorry my net connection is on the frits
it took 15 mins to update that postKarlos Vandango wrote:Congrats Chaud You have Been promoted to Asshole To Noobs
Reason why i said this comment is when ever someone suggests an idea he is always the first person to think a negtive way about it and its always a new member posting these suggestions
Deal with it? I point out flaws, OH GNOES
/endofworld.
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
- ShizKnight
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:01 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: _______