Intersting
Intersting
Now that Silkroad Guard is updating.
Let see how this work out.
My prediction.
1) IF Silkroad Guard works and botters get banned.
It will be disabled by JM within 2 mths.
2) Silkroad Guard got bypassed by most 3rd parth software. Render useless.
Discuss.
Let see how this work out.
My prediction.
1) IF Silkroad Guard works and botters get banned.
It will be disabled by JM within 2 mths.
2) Silkroad Guard got bypassed by most 3rd parth software. Render useless.
Discuss.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>
- Sir_Edward
- Active Member
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:03 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Apollo
Re: Intersting
there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
- XesoS
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1837
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:53 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Georgian4ever
Re: Intersting
Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
+1 like always ... they give us some hope but in the end , Joymax only thinks about $$$$$$$$

thanks to Mirosuke
- SnowShael
- Regular Member
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:46 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Odin
Re: Intersting
I think it's cute people think a Game Guard/ Hack Shield will stop Clientless bot's from logging in.
<< Banned from SRF for bot admission. -cin >>
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: Intersting
Tsume wrote:Intersting
+1
Unfortunately it will be option 2, as always...
Joymax just loves money...
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Intersting
Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.
I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
- Hennessey
- Valued Member
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Tibet
Re: Intersting
intersting indeed
Lvl 100 | Glavie | Active | Full Farmed
Lvl 99 | Wizard Bard | Active
Lvl 95 | Force Blader | Active | Full Farmed
Lvl 100 | S/S Nuker | Active
Lvl 98 | Bard Warlock | Active | Full Farmed
Lvl 93 | Bower | Active
Lvl 89 | 7:1 Spear | Active
Lvl 100 | Force Glavie | Active
Lvl 92 | Warrior Cleric | Active | Full Farmed
LEGIT 4 LIFE
Lvl 99 | Wizard Bard | Active
Lvl 95 | Force Blader | Active | Full Farmed
Lvl 100 | S/S Nuker | Active
Lvl 98 | Bard Warlock | Active | Full Farmed
Lvl 93 | Bower | Active
Lvl 89 | 7:1 Spear | Active
Lvl 100 | Force Glavie | Active
Lvl 92 | Warrior Cleric | Active | Full Farmed
LEGIT 4 LIFE
- _Razor_
- Hi, I'm New Here
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:21 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Uranus
Re: Intersting
Prediction ?
We already know what will happen.
Goldbots will bring a sexy back.
Anyone who think else is an idiot
We already know what will happen.
Goldbots will bring a sexy back.
Anyone who think else is an idiot

- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: Intersting
PR0METHEUS wrote:Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.
I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.
It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots...
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- MrSonic
- Regular Member
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:39 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Pacific
Re: Intersting
As long as it keeps the MAJORITY of the bots out for at least a few days it'll already be a big improvement compared to what JM has been doing for the past year.
Although i have to say that moving to HackShield was a horrible idea, considering their security system is one of the most bypassed in FPS games.
Although i have to say that moving to HackShield was a horrible idea, considering their security system is one of the most bypassed in FPS games.

- PR0METHEUS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:30 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Intersting
curvekiller wrote:PR0METHEUS wrote:Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.
I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.
It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots...
What's wrong with that? That just gives Joymax less types of bots to detect and ban. Ban most of them, everyone copies the working ones, then ban 30,000 copies of the same 2 or 3 bots.
Wash, rinse, repeat until all bot types are detected and eliminated.
Sure, new bot types will be created, but they will be easier to identify than the initial 15 types or whatever it is.
Missing the good times in SRO... 
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
SRO:
1x, STR Blader (Thebes)
54, STR blader (Venice)
0x, INT wizard (Venice)
19, INT spear (Venice)
34, STR rogue/bard (Venus)
0x, STR blader (Venus)
8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
- Heosphoros
- Active Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off topic
Re: Intersting
Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.
- Hex Link
- Casual Member
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:56 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Ocean [VIP]
Re: Intersting
PR0METHEUS wrote:Sir_Edward wrote:there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner
If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.
I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.
Maybe its because botters are scared to login....
You wouldnt want to lose your account, even if you use bots!
And yes it is intersting
I do not spread rumors....I create them!
Re: Intersting
So far most bots are working, only thing thats not working is clientless.
It won't be long till they bypass that security check.
It won't be long till they bypass that security check.
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>
- curvekiller
- Active Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bavaria
- Contact:
Re: Intersting
Let's hope for good updates next inspection... 
cpinney wrote:*points at my penis*
Guild Wars 2
Still checking SRF for the community.
- sn1kzZe
- Regular Member
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:30 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: 127.0.0.1
Re: Intersting
Heosphoros wrote:Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.
than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy
- Heosphoros
- Active Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off topic
Re: Intersting
sn1kzZe wrote:Heosphoros wrote:Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.
than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy
It was a serious question since everyone was saying intersting. I wasn't trying to be a wiseguy. I'm sorry i ment to type "suppose" but you still got the idea, its an isolated incident, wheras "intersting" was seen multiple times, which peaked me to ask if that is how its really spelt, since, afaik, the search button on the all mighty google is to hard for me to find.
- vermillion
- Regular Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:09 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: mistymountaintop
Re: Intersting
intersting if this goes on I might play again.. oh nvm. come on we all know JM too well. 



