Silkroad Online Forums

Anyone know anything about it?

What are you talking about? What new plan?

>_> Make a thread asking about a new plan without elaborating on what the plan is.

Create jobs, lower taxes, better schools, stronger health care?

dom wrote:Create jobs, lower taxes, better schools, stronger health care?

McBama can't do either. They think more regulations will fix our failing economy. I wouldn't even call that generic statement that most presidential Candidates make new. People need to see this unconstitutional coup for what it is and stand up. Down with the fed, we need a non-interventionist policy, and sound money. Not this fiat fiasco we have atm.

nohunta wrote:http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/18/news/economy/rtc_speculation/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote

OH, The bailouts that are ruining this country? The bailouts that Mcbama wants to continue? The imperialistic world policy both candidates support? The lipstick on a pig?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20080919/cm_ ... /op_337446
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/the-home-fr ... -last.html

We all know what's happening but we're afraid to admit it. We, no.. not us, but our Parents and every generation after Roosevelt fell asleep. They failed us by relying to heavily on the government. Now we stand here, before the greatest collapse of this great nation, we stand here, in apparent awe. We remember what this country was founded upon, we remember why this country was founded, and we see these socialist attacks on liberty for what they are. No more [1]evils of two lesser candidates.

[1] One may be less "evil" than the other one but they're still evil. What reasonable person, after reviewing their options, would vote in evil? Don't let the MnM trick you. There are candidates out there that support liberty, sound money, non-interventionist foreign policy, and the free market. Vote for them, don't vote for "more of the same."

I typed it before and I'll type it again: What is happening is not the failure of free market capitalism, it is the failure of socialism and fascism, it is the failure of Government regulations, it is the failure of every generation before us, and it will be our failure if we vote in either of these candidates.

More socialism won't help. More regulations won't help. More wars won't help. More bailouts won't help. More lipstick on a pig won't help.



Chuck Baldwin
Ralph Nader
Cynthia McKinney
Bob Barr

Ask yourself why McBama avoids talking about the economy.

Please tell me why McBama wont talk about the economy? Is it because he's a facist/socialist?

You turn me on when you get all political Barotix

nohunta wrote:Please tell me why McBama wont talk about the economy? Is it because he's a facist/socialist?

bama is a moron honestly. He tried to play the racial thing way too much. His votes are based on racial votes, and some black people are stupid enough to think hes black so they vote for him. Im voting McCain

Sharp324 wrote:

nohunta wrote:Please tell me why McBama wont talk about the economy? Is it because he's a facist/socialist?

bama is a moron honestly. He tried to play the racial thing way too much. His votes are based on racial votes, and some black people are stupid enough to think hes black so they vote for him. Im voting McCain

Firstly he is black...His dad is Black...In the eyes of whites who wouldnt know him.. he'd be black. I've not once heard him play the racial thing. If you look at what Baro said, Obama is the lesser of two evils. Yes lesser but its better than McCain. Vote for him if you want to it's people like you who put Bush into office. Lawl.

Sharp324 wrote:

nohunta wrote:Please tell me why McBama wont talk about the economy? Is it because he's a facist/socialist?

bama is a moron honestly. He tried to play the racial thing way too much.

I'm pretty sure those were the McCain people.

McBama won't talk about it because they don't know the cause or have a sensible solution. They want more bailouts and gov't regulation.

The problem I see is that people vote for "so-and-so" because he/she/it isn't as bad as "that other person." I blame the media and the people. How can such a large population be so blind as to ignore the fact that there are more than two candidates running. There are six. The best candidate that was running during the primaries dropped out and now that everything that candidate said is coming to pass, they all want his word on the current economic crisis. Stupid at it's best. Ruining America since 1913.

Barotix wrote:McBama won't talk about it because they don't know the cause or have a sensible solution. They want more bailouts and gov't regulation.

The problem I see is that people vote for "so-and-so" because he/she/it isn't as bad as "that other person." I blame the media and the people. How can such a large population be so blind as to ignore the fact that there are more than two candidates running. There are six. The best candidate that was running during the primaries dropped out and now that everything that candidate said is coming to pass, they all want his word on the current economic crisis. Stupid at it's best. Ruining America since 1913.

I dont think you can truly blame the people. I say the Media for not putting out ALL 6 of the candidates instead of just the Main 2. Is it possible that the media got payed off to only put those two up because they wont do anything for the economy/or dont know what to do for the economy?


I also blame Bush. We were doing just fking fine before his punk ass came along. We were in a surplus if im not mistaken.

The CPD decides the participants of the debates and the questions asked at the debate. If there is a candidate that goes against the current status quo his/her views are not represented by the debate (i.e.) they're not included. The American people deserve to hear from all sides of the political spectrum.

We were doing just fking fine before his punk ass came along. We were in a surplus if im not mistaken.

The surplus was superficial.

About "stupid at it's best." I was commenting on the executive branch. It should be Since 1929.

ITT:

barotix shows us all how much of a raging fagot he is.

McBama, lol

He's a choob.

cpinney wrote:ITT:

barotix shows us all how much of a raging fagot he is.

To much 4chan, me thinks. >_>

Barotix wrote:

cpinney wrote:ITT:

barotix shows us all how much of a raging fagot he is.

To much 4chan, me thinks. >_>

i prove my point.

Sarcasm? OR... did I miss the a memo or something

a memo of sarcasm? sure, lets go with that.



zZzZzZzZz..,.,.

>_> I'm confused. Does standing for liberty offend you somehow?

Draquish wrote:

Sharp324 wrote:

nohunta wrote:Please tell me why McBama wont talk about the economy? Is it because he's a facist/socialist?

bama is a moron honestly. He tried to play the racial thing way too much.

I'm pretty sure those were the McCain people.

Not really, he tried to use it, several times. He tried to get the black vote by praising them. Then he tried getting the white vote for talking about blacks. Then he did the whole MLK thing.

loooool barotix ignorent ....

you should care for the less fortunate peeps of your society,, greedy ....


and you dont have any socialist party's in america only liberals,, like socialism is a dissease or something,, *whooo* we fought against communism so we cant accept any socialist ideas *whooo* retards

This Tub will hit the Rheeeeeeffff!! Jump fe'r ye'r Liveeee's!

whiteraven wrote:1]loooool barotix ignorent ....

2]you should care for the less fortunate peeps of your society,, greedy ....


3]and you dont have any socialist party's in america only liberals,, like socialism is a dissease or something,, *whooo* we fought against communism so we cant accept any socialist ideas *whooo* retards

1] Learn some things about the American political and economic situation before you start calling people ignorant.

2]The best I can do for the less fortunate people in this country is advocate the preservation and application of the constitution so they may reach prosperity.

3]Imbecile. Define your terms. What is a liberal? Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security: Socialist. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: An attempt to give people universal home ownership, AKA: Socialism. Universal "free" health care? Socialism. The nationalization of Freddie and Fannie? Socialist. America runs on a welfare state, we're a country that is living beyond our means and we expect other people to help us when we screw up. The constitution was created to prevent that and protect the rights of the individual. I refuse to be a slave to any man or institution.

FYI, in America, socialism should play no part in our system.

Down with the USSRA (United Socialist Republics of America)
Long live the Republic.

Barotix wrote:

whiteraven wrote:1]loooool barotix ignorent ....

2]you should care for the less fortunate peeps of your society,, greedy ....


3]and you dont have any socialist party's in america only liberals,, like socialism is a dissease or something,, *whooo* we fought against communism so we cant accept any socialist ideas *whooo* retards

1] Learn some things about the American political and economic situation before you start calling people ignorant.

2]The best I can do for the less fortunate people in this country is advocate the preservation and application of the constitution so they may reach prosperity.

3]Imbecile. Define your terms. What is a liberal? Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security: Socialist. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: An attempt to give people universal home ownership, AKA: Socialism. Universal "free" health care? Socialism. The nationalization of Freddie and Fannie? Socialist. America runs on a welfare state, we're a country that is living beyond our means and we expect other people to help us when we screw up. The constitution was created to prevent that and protect the rights of the individual. I refuse to be a slave to any man or institution.

FYI, in America, socialism should play no part in our system.

Down with the USSRA (United Socialist Republics of America)
Long live the Republic.

1] i know something about american politics, my teachers like it to point to america when the politics FAIL, AGAIN (in america offcourse) and i know enought about economy know where im talking about

2] they wont reach prosperity when they have to do it all by themsels,, a dutch reporter tryed how it was for a almost unschooled employee to live in USA,, he needed 3 jobs (14 hours a day - monday / friday) to rent an apartment and buy some food.... the american dream,, prefer to call it the american fantasy *whoo* if i work hard enough i will find prosperity,, looool defenately not

3] well in holland we use terms for liberals (right) and socialists (left),, i généralised them (you still understand this shit?) when we would compare the most LEFT political party in USA (democrates?) they would be more RIGHT then the MOST RIGHT party in holland,,

thats why i said you dont know even what socialism is,,

example,, well this is what i remember of my history book,, correct me if im wrong,,

when wallstreet collapsed in .... (before kenedy right?) there was this idea of the president back then,, was called great deal? or big deal? something like that,, he builded dam's to keep people working, some farmers where forbidden to cultivate lands,, to get prices up again,, and economy went up again,,

peeps in USA called that president a COMUNIST!!!!!!!!!!!

multiply that idea tenfold,, that would be socialism,, governement has to care for the people NOT ONLY PROTECT,,

and yeah,, ur retarded because you live the american dream,, or should i call it the american fantasy?


and dont try to get me because i said something weird, ENGLISH IS NOT MY (translation site says) mother language and im not going to argu with someone in a language that i dont controle enough,, ur abusing your advantage of controling the language and use some fansy words and try to impress me like you know where you are talking about,, pfff, not impressed

~ little personal note ~ orospucocugu

/sigh. You don't understand liberty and you have a minor understanding of what socialism is. You don't understand the American economic or political system, if you did you wouldn't be making these statements.

2]they wont reach prosperity when they have to do it all by themsels,, a dutch reporter tryed how it was for a almost unschooled employee to live in USA,, he needed 3 jobs (14 hours a day - monday / friday) to rent an apartment and buy some food.... the american dream,, prefer to call it the american fantasy *whoo* if i work hard enough i will find prosperity,, looool defenately not

They won't reach prosperity because the government runs on a [1]fascist system with some hint of socialism that grows with every bailout. The reason many don't reach prosperity is because the rule of law dictated by the constitution is not upheld. They can and will reach prosperity if they do it by themselves. In a true American system someone would not move to this country unless they had a service to offer or were able to fend for themselves. The system America has created, a system of theft, propaganda, and [2]socialism is deteriorating. Foreigners, like yourself, just don't understand how an ideal [3]laissez faire system should work. Especially a citizen of Holland, a very socialized country.

when wallstreet collapsed in .... (before kenedy right?) there was this idea of the president back then,, was called great deal? or big deal? something like that,, he builded dam's to keep people working, some farmers where forbidden to cultivate lands,, to get prices up again,, and economy went up again,,

Hoover and Roosevelt pro-longed the great depression. In 1920 there was a depression that resolved itself within two years, without any gov't intervention. What happened in the 30s, that is more gov't regulations, is what led to the great depression. Had Hoover and Roosevelt stayed out of market affairs the depression that occurred would have been short lived. If the 1920-21 depression was about 1 year, the 1929 one would have been 3 years or less. What brought the economy up was not their reforms. What brought the economy up was war.

the american dream

The American dream can not be achieved in a fascist socialist system.

[1]Fascism, according to Merriam-Webster, is as follows: "often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition"

This means that the collective needs and rights of society come before the rights of the individual and gov't may use the initiation of force to achieve it's goals.

[2]Socialism ,according to Merriam-Webster, is as follows: "any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"

This means that government controls the means of production (industry) and distribution of goods. I have typed it before, America is going down a road. This road leads to socialism. We already have socialist institutions in this country and have recently nationalized Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. "Socialism is the mechanism which transforms government from its noble role as a protector into a predator." If there is to be gov't it should never overstep it's role as protector of the individual rights of it's citizens. Socialism and fascism wish to trample on the rights of the individual for an illusion of "collective" rights and anyone that goes against the wishes of the whole is selfish. That belief is destructive to man and is bound to implode upon it's self. One cannot fix a little socialism with more socialism, especially when socialism is what caused the mess in the first place.

[3]Laissez faire, according to Merriem-Webster, is as follows: "a doctrine opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights"

This means the government may not overstep it's boundaries. This means the role of government is to protect the rights of the individual, that is; life, liberty, and the protection of property rights. In a true free market the rights of the people would not be infringed upon for so-called "collective rights".

The market would be regulated by the market. Think of the market as a human body. The human body is constantly trying to maintain homeostases. If you take to much medicine you can harm your body, if you take steroids there are long-term consequences, if you become heavily reliant on drugs and start living from fix to fix you can destroy yourself. The market works in the same manner and is simply rejecting the overdose gov't bureaucrats try to feed it. The only solution is to let the market resolve the issue. That means a short depression, for some that means bankruptcy, and for most that means the beginning of a constitutional reign with liberty and justice for all.

I could go on and start talking about the nature of man but that would take several paragraphs and citations. The point I am trying to illustrate is that the current system with it's sprawling bureaucracy and socialist reforms is not, can not, and will not work in the United States of America.

If you want to be prosperous you must work hard and never give up. [pp]Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.[/pp]

Bovina Sancta. Someone got schooled.

whiteraven wrote:

Barotix wrote:

whiteraven wrote:1]loooool barotix ignorent ....

2]you should care for the less fortunate peeps of your society,, greedy ....


3]and you dont have any socialist party's in america only liberals,, like socialism is a dissease or something,, *whooo* we fought against communism so we cant accept any socialist ideas *whooo* retards

1] Learn some things about the American political and economic situation before you start calling people ignorant.

2]The best I can do for the less fortunate people in this country is advocate the preservation and application of the constitution so they may reach prosperity.

3]Imbecile. Define your terms. What is a liberal? Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security: Socialist. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: An attempt to give people universal home ownership, AKA: Socialism. Universal "free" health care? Socialism. The nationalization of Freddie and Fannie? Socialist. America runs on a welfare state, we're a country that is living beyond our means and we expect other people to help us when we screw up. The constitution was created to prevent that and protect the rights of the individual. I refuse to be a slave to any man or institution.

FYI, in America, socialism should play no part in our system.

Down with the USSRA (United Socialist Republics of America)
Long live the Republic.

1] i know something about american politics, my teachers like it to point to america when the politics FAIL, AGAIN (in america offcourse) and i know enought about economy know where im talking about

2] they wont reach prosperity when they have to do it all by themsels,, a dutch reporter tryed how it was for a almost unschooled employee to live in USA,, he needed 3 jobs (14 hours a day - monday / friday) to rent an apartment and buy some food.... the american dream,, prefer to call it the american fantasy *whoo* if i work hard enough i will find prosperity,, looool defenately not

3] well in holland we use terms for liberals (right) and socialists (left),, i généralised them (you still understand this shit?) when we would compare the most LEFT political party in USA (democrates?) they would be more RIGHT then the MOST RIGHT party in holland,,

thats why i said you dont know even what socialism is,,

example,, well this is what i remember of my history book,, correct me if im wrong,,

when wallstreet collapsed in .... (before kenedy right?) there was this idea of the president back then,, was called great deal? or big deal? something like that,, he builded dam's to keep people working, some farmers where forbidden to cultivate lands,, to get prices up again,, and economy went up again,,

peeps in USA called that president a COMUNIST!!!!!!!!!!!

multiply that idea tenfold,, that would be socialism,, governement has to care for the people NOT ONLY PROTECT,,

and yeah,, ur retarded because you live the american dream,, or should i call it the american fantasy?


and dont try to get me because i said something weird, ENGLISH IS NOT MY (translation site says) mother language and im not going to argu with someone in a language that i dont controle enough,, ur abusing your advantage of controling the language and use some fansy words and try to impress me like you know where you are talking about,, pfff, not impressed

~ little personal note ~ orospucocugu

Just Stop you wont beat Barotrix in Politics or Economics. I tried. /Fail