Page 1 of 1

Brain Scans Used to Convict Woman of Murder in India

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:41 am
by Hostage
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128790.html
The New York Times is reporting that an Indian criminal court accepted a brain scan as evidence of guilt in a murder trial in India earlier this year. The developer of the the Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature (BEOS) test claims that it uses electrodes to detect when regions of the brain "light up" with guilty knowledge.

The woman, Aditi Sharma, was accused of killing her former fiancé, Udit Bharati. They were living in Pune when Ms. Sharma met another man and eloped with him to Delhi. Later Ms. Sharma returned to Pune and, according to prosecutors, asked Mr. Bharati to meet her at a McDonald’s. She was accused of poisoning him with arsenic-laced food.

Ms. Sharma, 24, agreed to take a BEOS test in Mumbai, the capital of Maharashtra. (Suspects may be tested only with their consent, but forensic investigators say many agree because they assume it will spare them an aggressive police interrogation.)

After placing 32 electrodes on Ms. Sharma’s head, investigators said, they read aloud their version of events, speaking in the first person (“I bought arsenic”; “I met Udit at McDonald’s”), along with neutral statements like “The sky is blue,” which help the software distinguish memories from normal cognition.

For an hour, Ms. Sharma said nothing. But the relevant nooks of her brain where memories are thought to be stored buzzed when the crime was recounted, according to Mr. Joseph, the state investigator. The judge endorsed Mr. Joseph’s assertion that the scans were proof of “experiential knowledge” of having committed the murder, rather than just having heard about it...


Of course how could we have over looked the guilty areas. We should definitely do this with all murder cases now. :)

So anyway thoughts? Could this really be considered evidence of any kind?

.side note I lol'ed at the cartoon. xD

Re: Brain Scans Used to Convict Woman of Murder in India

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:44 am
by ImmortalKiller
As a statistician would say:

There will almost always be to many lurking variables in order to deem most cases statistically valuable.

Too many unknown variables >.>

Re: Brain Scans Used to Convict Woman of Murder in India

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:17 am
by SM-Count
Too bad the area of the brain that controls guilt is also responsible for anger, aggression, and adjacent to fear and anxiety. The only accurate way would be to tract signals that release ganaphelemine (sp?) the hormone that causes the feeling of guilt, even then those nodes can also transfer other information so it'd be extremely accurate. I wouldn't be comfortable with the justice system if this became regular use.

I would like micro-expression reading to be more used though, as time consuming as it is, it's ability to detect lies is an astonishingly high rate. (>99%)