Silkroad Online Forums

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrek_Goes ... oes_Fourth

Shrek the fouth, and theres going to be a fifth???!!!
these film producers these days are really good at milking DEAD COWS!

In my opinion, One and Two turned out to be quite good in the box office. Shrek the Third had a lot of hype, and didn't quite perform as expected. Didn't do so well - That was in Australia, was it like that in the U.S or Europe?

Snoopy wrote:In my opinion, One and Two turned out to be quite good in the box office. Shrek the Third had a lot of hype, and didn't quite perform as expected. Didn't do so well - That was in Australia, was it like that in the U.S or Europe?

Yeah, 1 and 2 were good, 3 not so much.

In Canada, Shrek the third was ok, meh, about the same result as the new Indy movie. like 4/5, not quite there...EH? and it came out at a good spot, right after spidy 3 and before the summer movie rush.

BlackFox898 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrek_Goes_Fourth#Shrek_Goes_Fourth

Shrek the fouth, and theres going to be a fifth???!!!
these film producers these days are really good at milking DEAD COWS!

i hate how hollywood does this, especially with the ripping off of marvel comics

awww
should have stopped at #1

MrBow wrote:awww
should have stopped at #1

lol I Agree. .. . .. . .. .. . .: /.>;. ; .;./; -[4

First wast eh best. Two was ok but then the 3rd one not so really.

Eh, Dreamworks needs to know when to stop. I hope they won't ruin Kung Fu Panda with sequels. >.>