Page 1 of 3
Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:38 am
by Squirt
Why are cock fights elligal? If people kill cows to eat them, and woman take of there clothes to entertain people then why are cock fights elligal? yeah i know only a special person would want to see 2 roosters pecke ach other to death but still. Pron is 5X worser than cock fights =/
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:39 am
by daemon225
cuz they wanna make things that r entertianing banned or it cuz it is considered animal crulty but its fun i been 2 2
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:41 am
by Verfo
because animal right stuff
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:42 am
by daemon225
damn animal lovers
P.S. wanna know wats worse illegal horse fighting they bite kick and do other things to eatcher untill they die
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:47 am
by NobleHunter
Because, the animal (believe it or not -.-) is able to feel pain, the birds are equipped with either metal spurs or knives, tied to the leg in the area where the cock“s natural spur has been partially removed.
So a simple fight between 2 male rivals turns into a masacre because of senseless people, its not natural.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:54 am
by Inuyasha584
the name of the "game" is so wrong in many ways

Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 2:33 am
by Squirt
^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:55 am
by HyorunmarouZ
Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
There's a difference between kill for food and kill for fun. I'm not fond of killing animals just for the fun of it, it's pretty sick.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:56 am
by MastaChiefX
Illegal.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:01 am
by mahumps
Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
They kill chicken for food, which is the chicken's main purpose in life I believe. But fighting two chickens for fun is not really a good thing to watch. And it's against the law concerning cruelty to animals.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:24 am
by Rainigul
HyorunmarouZ wrote:Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
There's a difference between kill for food and kill for fun. I'm not fond of killing animals just for the fun of it, it's pretty sick.
Then hunting should be illegal unless you plan on eating/utilizing every animal you shoot.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:26 am
by CrimsonNuker
MastaChiefX wrote:Ellegal.
Fixed*

Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:28 am
by mahumps
Rainigul wrote:HyorunmarouZ wrote:Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
There's a difference between kill for food and kill for fun. I'm not fond of killing animals just for the fun of it, it's pretty sick.
Then hunting should be illegal unless you plan on eating/utilizing every animal you shoot.
The animals are eaten alright. Well that is here in my country idk about yours. After the picture taking, hey I killed this big wild boar, the hunter eats the meat.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:19 am
by Love
pretty hypocritical how you think is ok to kill to eat but not ok to kill for fun, newsflash the animal is getting killed on both so what difference does it make. anyways is illegal couse some people are just too sentimental and stupid couse way worse things happen and the large majority overlooks them, my point is animal lovers = need a life and a brain
UFC UFC UFC UFC human fighting without the hustle

who cares if they get hurt right

Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:25 am
by Da_Realest
Love wrote:pretty hypocritical how you think is ok to kill to eat but not ok to kill for fun, newsflash the animal is getting killed on both so what difference does it make. anyways is illegal couse some people are just too sentimental and stupid couse way worse things happen that are worse and the large majority overlooks them, my point is = animal lovers get a life
UFC UFC UFC UFC human fighting without the hustle

who cares if they get hurt right

Because one is for survival and the other is for entertainment.
How about I compare UFC to WWE. They are both fighting right?
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:28 am
by HyorunmarouZ
Love wrote:pretty hypocritical how you think is ok to kill to eat but not ok to kill for fun, newsflash the animal is getting killed on both so what difference does it make. anyways is illegal couse some people are just too sentimental and stupid couse way worse things happen and the large majority overlooks them, my point is animal lovers = need a life and a brain
UFC UFC UFC UFC human fighting without the hustle

who cares if they get hurt right

It's the kind of death not the death itself. I'm not an animal lover, i just hate watching people killing living stuff for the sake of killing it (be it other animals, plants or humans). If the animal is killed quickly with the less pain possible and they use the meat and anything else they can, then it's death wasn't a waste.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:34 am
by Love
Da_Realest wrote:Love wrote:pretty hypocritical how you think is ok to kill to eat but not ok to kill for fun, newsflash the animal is getting killed on both so what difference does it make. anyways is illegal couse some people are just too sentimental and stupid couse way worse things happen that are worse and the large majority overlooks them, my point is = animal lovers get a life
UFC UFC UFC UFC human fighting without the hustle

who cares if they get hurt right

Because one is for survival and the other is for entertainment.
How about I compare UFC to WWE. They are both fighting right?
let me explain to you what i mean, in some countries woman are sold and the lips of their vagina are removed so it even hurts to have sex and you are worrying about the life of some brainless animal with a 2-3 years lifespan wish you are ok killing anyways, killing is killing regarless of how is done ............emotions are added by _____ people. foolish hypocrital humans are the best and let me give you an example when cows dont want to walk the handlers push them and that is call animal abuse .....pushing a cow who is about to get killed....do you think the cow cares about being pushed, an animal that spends its life chilling getting fat ............
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:42 am
by Azilius
Love wrote:Da_Realest wrote:Love wrote:pretty hypocritical how you think is ok to kill to eat but not ok to kill for fun, newsflash the animal is getting killed on both so what difference does it make. anyways is illegal couse some people are just too sentimental and stupid couse way worse things happen that are worse and the large majority overlooks them, my point is = animal lovers get a life
UFC UFC UFC UFC human fighting without the hustle

who cares if they get hurt right

Because one is for survival and the other is for entertainment.
How about I compare UFC to WWE. They are both fighting right?
let me explain to you what i mean, in some countries woman are sold and the lips of their vagina are removed so it even hurts to have sex and you are worrying about the life of some brainless animal with a 2-3 years lifespan wish you are ok killing anyways, killing is killing regarless of how is done ............emotions are added by _____ people
Worse things happen in the world - but it doesn't mean we should look over everything else. One way (killing an animal for food) is for survival, and the animal feels little to no pain (instantly killed). The other is based on pure entertainment at the cost of the animal, and is of no gain to anyone. How about I put you against someone from the UFC, they are equipped with knives and you are naked - it's a fight to the death. It doesn't really matter though because people are being killed every day overseas and it's much more important to focus on that than some random guy and random fighter fighting to the death. I mean you're going to die some day regardless right? Put yourself in the animals position - just because we have the power to make them do such things doesn't mean we should. Yes killing is killing, but at what point does the end justify the mean?
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 5:56 am
by Love
no gain to any1 ? cock fighting generates a lot of money that could feed more than couple of families of the human variaty............. and just to be clear about something UFC fighting is like cock fighting just to an smaller degree people get killed and fight each other just like the birds they brake each others face, ribs , muscles, get brain dmg, etc and yes this has *pain* involve but is more sophisticated, you just fail to realize it. once again stupid people with nothing better to do than saying ahhh the little bird got hurt, lets KFC on my birthday only since we dont like supporting animal killing .............or better yet i am a vegetarian lets eat fish !....get a clue
oh and that smart comment about the just couse we can kill them doesnt mean we should, if animal could kill us oh dude you have no clue, we would be gone so fast it wouldnt be funny ask a lion if is ok to kill but then again you see people playing with them sometimes it must mean they wouldnt even think about it .........
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:33 am
by strangelove
Love wrote:no gain to any1 ? cock fighting generates a lot of money that could feed more than couple of families of the human variaty and just to be clear about something UFC fighting is like cock fighting just to an smaller degree people get killed and fight each other just like the birds they brake each others face, ribs , muscles, get brain dmg, etc and yes this has *pain* involve but is more sophisticated, you just fail to realize that.
UFC is a fight between people FULLY AWARE of what they're going to do. In a cock fight, the animals are tortured so they become aggressive and most of the times injected with steroids that increase their aggression even more. So you get these birds full of aggression and they basically fight their heart out to the first thing that confronts them (which is usually the other bird). I'm not an animal activist or anything either, but your reasoning to why this should be allowed is flawed to say the least.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:36 am
by Locketart
Love wrote:no gain to any1 ? cock fighting generates a lot of money that could feed more than couple of families of the human variaty and just to be clear about something UFC fighting is like cock fighting just to an smaller degree people get killed and fight each other just like the birds they brake each others face, ribs , muscles, get brain dmg, etc and yes this has *pain* involve but is more sophisticated, you just fail to realize that. once again stupid people with nothing better to do than saying ahhh little bird got hurt lets KFC on my birthday only since we dont like supporting animal killing that much.............or better yet i am a vegetarian lets eat fish !....get a clue
oh and that smart comment about the just couse we can kill them doesnt mean we should, if animal could kill us oh dude you have no clue, we would be gone so fast it wouldnt be funny ask a lion if is ok to kill but then again you see people playing with them sometimes it must mean they wouldnt even think about it .........
It's pretty rare to die in an MMA fight nowadays unless it's underground. The referees are trained and they know when to stop a fight before brain damage occurs. And I'm pretty sure cocks are starved/tortured before they actually fight. 2 healthy cocks wouldn't fight each other.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:47 am
by Love
Fug_Dup wrote:Love wrote:no gain to any1 ? cock fighting generates a lot of money that could feed more than couple of families of the human variaty and just to be clear about something UFC fighting is like cock fighting just to an smaller degree people get killed and fight each other just like the birds they brake each others face, ribs , muscles, get brain dmg, etc and yes this has *pain* involve but is more sophisticated, you just fail to realize that.
UFC is a fight between people FULLY AWARE of what they're going to do. In a cock fight, the animals are tortured so they become aggressive and most of the times injected with steroids that increase their aggression even more. So you get these birds full of aggression and they basically fight their heart out to the first thing that confronts them (which is usually the other bird). I'm not an animal activist or anything either, but your reasoning to why this should be allowed is flawed to say the least.
you know when i was younger i used to have this kind of fish, forgot the name but males would attack each other istantly and why is that couse they are animals, that is their nature ....... i didnt injected him or torture him to fight, fact most of them had never seing another of its kind before so there wasnt any1 to *teach* him how to go kill the other .........again they are animals
let me go back to something people get killed for the most bullshit unreasonable reasons every day and no1 does anything and some little brainless birds fight and the FBI hunts them down make them pay + put them in jail ........while at the same time some dude gets pay half a million for a paris hilton picture with her new shoes.....
another example of how beings work put a human male and female on some island never teach them anything and when they turn around 17 they will be having sex and making families oh also will be walking without mommy and daddy to teach them ( you figure how they survive as babies without help is an example....) once again nature, purpose, w/e you want to call it
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:35 am
by strangelove
Love wrote:Fug_Dup wrote:Love wrote:no gain to any1 ? cock fighting generates a lot of money that could feed more than couple of families of the human variaty and just to be clear about something UFC fighting is like cock fighting just to an smaller degree people get killed and fight each other just like the birds they brake each others face, ribs , muscles, get brain dmg, etc and yes this has *pain* involve but is more sophisticated, you just fail to realize that.
UFC is a fight between people FULLY AWARE of what they're going to do. In a cock fight, the animals are tortured so they become aggressive and most of the times injected with steroids that increase their aggression even more. So you get these birds full of aggression and they basically fight their heart out to the first thing that confronts them (which is usually the other bird). I'm not an animal activist or anything either, but your reasoning to why this should be allowed is flawed to say the least.
you know when i was younger i used to have this kind of fish, forgot the name but males would attack each other istantly and why is that couse they are animals, that is their nature ....... i didnt injected him or torture him to fight, fact most of them had never seing another of its kind before so there wasnt any1 to *teach* him how to go kill the other .........again they are animals
let me go back to something people get killed for the most bullshit unreasonable reasons every day and no1 does anything and some little brainless birds fight and the FBI hunts them down make them pay + put them in jail ........while at the same time some dude gets pay half a million for a paris hilton picture with her new shoes.....
another example of how beings work put a human male and female on some island never teach them anything and when they turn around 17 they will be having sex and making families oh also will be walking without mommy and daddy to teach them ( you figure how they survive as babies without help is an example....) once again nature, purpose, w/e you want to call it
Aggressive males fighting for territory is common in the animal kingdom, however, aggression in cock fights is induced by introducing steroids to the cocks and testing their endurance through the use of torture and starvation (as someone previously posted). The birds can coexist peacefully with each other in captivity (I suppose they may squabble from time to time), so it isn't just some natural aggression that takes over which causes the birds to fight to the death with another of its kind. If you really have some strange need to watch animals fight each other, watch the Discovery Channel and place bets. o.O
The only real issue I see here though is your anthropocentric argument, and individuals who are unable to comprehend sentience to the smallest degree will fail to see otherwise. :/
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:10 am
by Love
Fug_Dup wrote:The only real issue I see here though is your anthropocentric argument, and individuals who are unable to comprehend sentience to the smallest degree will fail to see otherwise. :/
big words o.O .............anyways lets go back to being hypocrital, would you mind stepping on a ant? not really, you can argue you care but ill call bs on your face, you are taking the life of another being but what is so special about it is that is very small so you dont perceive anything, no pain, nothing so you just dont care
now on the other hand there is the chicken who is treated as an item by humans, you just breed and kill them and this is generally acceptable but unlike the ant you perceive its pain so you freack out but in the end you did the same thing
____________________________________
there are 2 basic ways for me to delete that line, i can either start at the front and press delete or start at the end and backspace, either way it will be deleted and the result will be the same
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:16 am
by Priam
Because having two roosters fight, just because you'll then finally (first in months) get a hard-on and finally can go home and bang your wife or brother, is morally just not right.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:22 am
by strangelove
Love wrote:Fug_Dup wrote:The only real issue I see here though is your anthropocentric argument, and individuals who are unable to comprehend sentience to the smallest degree will fail to see otherwise. :/
big words o.O .............anyways lets go back to being hypocrital, would you mind stepping on a ant? not really, you can argue you care but ill call bs on your face, you are taking the life of another being but what is so special about it is that is very small so you dont perceive anything, no pain, nothing so you just dont care
now on the other hand there is the chicken who is treated as an item by humans, you just breed and kill them and this is generally acceptable but unlike the ant you perceive its pain so you freack out but in the end you did the same thing
Anthropocentrism is basically the idea that the only thing humans should worry about is other humans and judge other non-human beings based on the central concerns for humans. Sentience is "the ability to feel or perceive subjectively", from Wikipedia.
It isn't so much the action as the purpose for the action that is in question.____________________________________
there are 2 basic ways for me to delete that line, i can either start at the front and press delete or start at the end and backspace, either way it will be deleted and the result will be the same
Yet this still begs the question- what purpose would you have for deleting the line? =)
*begins making text protection services*
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:23 am
by Sharp324
Go to Tennessee. You know theres a town there, Cocke county. lol even the football team, call the fighting cocks lolz.
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:35 am
by iGod
Would you rather be shot or scratched to death?
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:53 am
by tedtwilliger
Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
Lets replace roosters with humans. I grab 2 people at random, strip them naked, give them knives and force them to fight to death. Is it still right then?
Re: Elligal Cocks?Why?
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:55 am
by Squirt
tedtwilliger wrote:Squirt wrote:^ Our cavemen ancestors slept in cold caves and hunted moose so that a family cn sit down and watch 2 chickens kill each other. The knife/spikes are just add-ons. I don't see nothing wrong with chikens fighting. millions of chickens are killed each yea and the goerment cares about 5 chickens that peck at each other?
Lets replace roosters with humans. I grab 2 people at random, strip them naked, give them knives and force them to fight to death. Is it still right then?
Romans did it
