Page 1 of 2
Middle School kids + Free Avaliable Birth Control = 69?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:04 pm
by Shadowman20818
http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/10/18/mi ... index.html
Support or appose this?
Personally I support this, better them not have kids during pre-teen years than have to struggle through the rest of their life. Not denying more sex will occur but I feel it's necessary.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:14 pm
by Innovacious
Uh, in england you can just go to your doctor and get any of that stuff at just about any age. So it isnt really anything new.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:12 pm
by Rainigul
I need to live in maine, lol.
I support it.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:25 pm
by Cruor
They are in farking middle school...
There can be only one solution!

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:35 pm
by Reise
I live in Maine but I never watch the news.
But yeah it's retarded they even want to do that, we should just beat the hell out of the kids that do. That way they set an example. Our schools suck so bad too lol.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:40 pm
by Rainigul
Reise wrote:I live in Maine but I never watch the news.
But yeah it's retarded they even want to do that, we should just beat the hell out of the kids that do. That way they set an example. Our schools suck so bad too lol.
??
How is it a bad idea?
You can beat the shit out of your kids if you want to, but you should still have this for those who don't.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:43 pm
by Reise
Giving the kids birth control will only stop some births. It'll probably increase the amount of sexual activity and the chance for someone to **** up and get pregnant.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:32 am
by Itonami
whatever works.
seems like encouragement to me. >.>
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:49 am
by XemnasXD
kidz are having sex younger and younger teen mothers pop up more and more...the kids who weren't going to have sex that early won't care anyway the kids who are having sex that early might be encouraged to use protection...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:53 am
by Disconn3cted
should be allowed but should not be kept a secret like how schools in america give you a lunch bill but if you dont actually pay it they legally aren't allowed to do anything
and i dont think they should be offered by schools but like health departments or something which i think they are
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:56 am
by Jstar1
oppose
offering pills is just like waving a flag and saying "its ok to have teenage sex because you won't ever get pregnent with our pills"
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:39 am
by redneck
Reise wrote:Giving the kids birth control will only stop some births. It'll probably increase the amount of sexual activity and the chance for someone to **** up and get pregnant.
Amen dude. Even if a bitch tells me she takes the pill I'd still rather wear a rubber. You don't know how many frigging STD's they have..or they just might forget to take it that day.
I myself have a suspicion that Birth Control Pills are related to Breast Cancer...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:47 am
by Barotix
old [for me] we did a debate in english class, but we couldnt continue cause some of the debaters were taking some of the stuff i was spewing a little to personal. knahmean. anyhoo yeah birth control to middle schoolers sure why not?
i mean if their gonna **** they might as well **** safe right??? might as well do the whole nine yards with the following: the pill, a rubber, and a diaphragm.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:58 am
by Silver0
its something ignorant 2 say kids will have sex no matter what and adult in the media busniess know, they dont care what the kids will perceive about sex, and ppl wanting 2 want, sex is a money maker clothing/shoes/ the list is endless saying that giving them birth control is a bad idea cuz it will give them the bad idea then you should also be in support of communism so we can regulate television for kids b/c television is the youths babysitter and if there having sex at younger age it isnt b/c we hand out condoms
its parenting and the media
they dont hand out guns to cops so they can shoot who they please
just there when it might be needed
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:02 am
by XemnasXD
Silver0 wrote:its something ignorant 2 say kids will have sex no matter what and adult in the media busniess know, they dont care what the kids will perceive about sex, and ppl wanting 2 want, sex is a money maker clothing/shoes/ the list is endless saying that giving them birth control is a bad idea cuz it will give them the bad idea then you should also be in support of communism so we can regulate television for kids b/c television is the youths babysitter and if there having sex at younger age it isnt b/c we hand out condoms
its parenting and the media
they dont hand out guns to cops so they can shoot who they please
just there when it might be needed
nicely put...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:25 am
by TOloseGT
i can't understand middle school, i can understand handing them out in high school.
lol, our RAs have a basket full of condoms to give out for free.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:23 am
by Reise
Silver0 wrote:saying that giving them birth control is a bad idea cuz it will give them the bad idea then you should also be in support of communism so we can regulate television for kids b/c television is the youths babysitter and if there having sex at younger age it isnt b/c we hand out condoms
How the **** is that communism? Anyway I don't see any problems in regulating TV, but people don't, and you still have kids watching shit on MTV or whatever and suddenly you wonder why all these teen pregnancies happen. They're just as likely to see that shit and do it as they are to get bad ideas from having all these people hand them the tools to have sex.
Screw birth control pills, teach those burnouts a lesson and let them have kids at age 12 or whatever. Then they'll know they farked up, and other kids just might see that and realize they don't want it to happen to them.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:00 am
by Vibrator
SWEET. i Live like 1 hour away form maine (Massachusets) Woot time to go to maine theaters and start scoring xD
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:01 am
by Silver0
Reise wrote:Silver0 wrote:saying that giving them birth control is a bad idea cuz it will give them the bad idea then you should also be in support of communism so we can regulate television for kids b/c television is the youths babysitter and if there having sex at younger age it isnt b/c we hand out condoms
How the **** is that communism? Anyway I don't see any problems in regulating TV, but people don't, and you still have kids watching shit on MTV or whatever and suddenly you wonder why all these teen pregnancies happen. They're just as likely to see that shit and do it as they are to get bad ideas from having all these people hand them the tools to have sex.
Screw birth control pills, teach those burnouts a lesson and let them have kids at age 12 or whatever. Then they'll know they farked up, and other kids just might see that and realize they don't want it to happen to them.
yeah let them have kids who will have kids at 12 as well a cycle that will grow huge then we have ignorant 30yr old unprepaid working dead end jobs at fast food and clothing stores
what a great idea 2 have a HUGE gap with just ignorance just to show them a lesson a thing that they will never have the ability to back and fix just live with it to death a lesson is something you learn from to avoid it in the future but having kids at teen yrs isnt something that can be repeated to benefit from the lesson just regret
and the tv communist and regulating tv it is regulated and look at what we r watching and what parents approve of kids watching if your gunna give them restricted freedom at least teach that a child of every household doesnt need 2 pump out a baby every 9 months b/c in the world there is other planned births that can continue the cycle of birth death
so there birth or pleasure mistake can be avoided even though its something we the people who enjoy watching shows like that which is the reason more r produce
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:30 am
by Cruor
Vibrator wrote:SWEET. i Live like 1 hour away form maine (Massachusets) Woot time to go to maine theaters and start scoring xD
Sex isn't a game.

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:32 am
by XemnasXD
Cruor wrote:Vibrator wrote:SWEET. i Live like 1 hour away form maine (Massachusets) Woot time to go to maine theaters and start scoring xD
Sex isn't a game.

it can be, ever try role-playing

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:33 am
by TOloseGT
Cruor wrote:Sex isn't a game.

blasphemy!

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:36 am
by Rainigul
redneck wrote:Reise wrote:Giving the kids birth control will only stop some births. It'll probably increase the amount of sexual activity and the chance for someone to **** up and get pregnant.
Amen dude. Even if a bitch tells me she takes the pill I'd still rather wear a rubber. You don't know how many frigging STD's they have..or they just might forget to take it that day.
I myself have a suspicion that Birth Control Pills are related to Breast Cancer...
I think so too man, I think all the pills women take IS why they're gettin' cancer all the time.
I mean, why does all this cancer just pop up now? Same time pills & shit pop up.
Yeah.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:07 am
by ineedhelp
XemnasXD wrote:Cruor wrote:Vibrator wrote:SWEET. i Live like 1 hour away form maine (Massachusets) Woot time to go to maine theaters and start scoring xD
Sex isn't a game.

it can be, ever try role-playing

lol i should try that one time ;p
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:16 am
by Reise
Silver0 wrote:yeah let them have kids who will have kids at 12 as well a cycle that will grow huge then we have ignorant 30yr old unprepaid working dead end jobs at fast food and clothing stores
what a great idea 2 have a HUGE gap with just ignorance just to show them a lesson a thing that they will never have the ability to back and fix just live with it to death a lesson is something you learn from to avoid it in the future but having kids at teen yrs isnt something that can be repeated to benefit from the lesson just regret
Yeah, because anything that isn't in agreement with you is ignorance.
Look at things a bit more objectively.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:05 am
by Silver0
Reise wrote:Silver0 wrote:yeah let them have kids who will have kids at 12 as well a cycle that will grow huge then we have ignorant 30yr old unprepaid working dead end jobs at fast food and clothing stores
what a great idea 2 have a HUGE gap with just ignorance just to show them a lesson a thing that they will never have the ability to back and fix just live with it to death a lesson is something you learn from to avoid it in the future but having kids at teen yrs isnt something that can be repeated to benefit from the lesson just regret
Yeah, because anything that isn't in agreement with you is ignorance.
Look at things a bit more objectively.
lol that has nothing to do with it but hey a person at 30 making burgers must be a genius since maybe they agree with me
what Farking retard comment

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:23 am
by Reise
lol You could attribute that 'retarded' comment to the fact that it's pretty damn hard deciphering what you write. But I meant what I said.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:31 am
by Silver0
Reise wrote:lol You could attribute that 'retarded' comment to the fact that it's pretty damn hard deciphering what you write. But I meant what I said.
i Ment ignorance as IQ range that there IQ was not where they want it but if you truely ment it i c no point of trying 2 prove you wrong
and most people i talk 2 online and offline seem to not have a problem its always the ones that they them selves have thought out side there thoughts just there own i speak that cuz 2 weeks ago i might of agreed with you opinion about this i just today thought more for it
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:37 am
by Crumpets
Ouch talking bout an IQ on this board .......
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:40 am
by Reise
I just can't wait to see the condition of our culture in like 40 years. The rate it's going sex will be so commonplace it won't even be an issue and people will be screwing each other in public and shit. Better hope there's some mega advances in protection by then.