Page 1 of 1
Who's right?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:23 pm
by Stormprobe
Ok some and my friend where talking on msn and then this hapened... so whos right?
Matriarch = me
Juan= friend
Matriarch of whores says: Yo man xbox 360 sucks why you still playing that?
Juan360<3 says: Lol man shut up 360 has best graphics ever.
Matriarch of whores says: Dude there are computers better then 360 out there
Juan360<3 says: LOL no 360 is best system out there no computer can beat a 360's graphic
Matriarch of whores says: No there are computers that perform better then 360 if not now then there will be ...
Juan360<3 says: Dude NO computer will ever pass 360s graphic settings its impossible do you know who made 360? microsoft
Matriarch of whores says: Do you know who makes computers ? the same people who made 360
Juan360<3 says: Shut up no computer in teh world can surpass the graphics and speed of 360
Matriarch of whores says: Lol what ever well see now go back to your little halo 3.
Juan360<3 says: pfft noob thinks computer is better then 360
Matriarch of whores says: i know you are
And i just signed off there and posted it here lol
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:38 pm
by Stormprobe
*bump*
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:43 pm
by Locketart
...Computers are used to make Xbox games...
Computers with video rendering software need extreme hardware. Computers will always be better than consoles. The high end ones of course.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:46 pm
by deep.in
Than convo is the worst act i saw

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:47 pm
by PB_and_J
deep.in wrote:Than convo is the worst act i saw

Not the worst, but close to it.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:47 pm
by Stormprobe
deep.in wrote:Than convo is the worst act i saw

i closed msn before i could copy paste so i just wrewrote and pasted =O anyways u get the point of what it was like..
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:55 pm
by Shadowman20818
In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Also, 15 minute bump?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:57 pm
by Stormprobe
Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Also, 15 minute bump?
about 15 minutes thing im hyperactive so yeah ... =O fast hands cant wait.. so vasfuhzsgashgshdgtgfsadafadbabsdfig lol
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:19 am
by Reise
Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Ahahah what?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:38 am
by Nuklear
Reise wrote:Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Ahahah what?
Seconded.
Comp>consoles always.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:40 am
by Silkroad
Nuklear wrote:Reise wrote:Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Ahahah what?
Seconded.
Comp>consoles always.
this is untrue when it comes to games as consoles can dedicate all of the computing power on the game ... not to mention the game is being run from a disc instead of the hard drive
also game producers are focusing on optimizing the game performance for consoles rather than computers ... this is also a big reason why consoles run games faster and sometimes with better graphics
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:51 am
by Aby
Stop Riding eachothers' ass..
If he wants to play 320 leave him be, Halo is out now so you two wont be talking much for a while anyway.
Just like if you wanna play a game that doesnt require a headset he should leave you be =)
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:02 am
by Silkroad
Aby wrote:Stop Riding eachothers' ass..
If he wants to play 320 leave him be, Halo is out now so you two wont be talking much for a while anyway.
Just like if you wanna play a game that doesnt require a headset he should leave you be =)
320... thats ALMOST a circle

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:04 am
by Itonami
Silkroad wrote:Aby wrote:Stop Riding eachothers' ass..
If he wants to play 320 leave him be, Halo is out now so you two wont be talking much for a while anyway.
Just like if you wanna play a game that doesnt require a headset he should leave you be =)
320... thats ALMOST a circle

Someone isnt a gamer
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:06 am
by rumpleKillskin
Nuklear wrote:Reise wrote:Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Ahahah what?
Seconded.
Comp>consoles always.
I have to agree and disagree at the same time.
Right now, computers have the better software. However, it seems like consoles are catching up, and could be better. The only question is that if thats so, dont you have to make a game with a computer?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:23 am
by rek
Of course computers are better, but all computers are different. For xbox its all the same, theres no better xbox than the original.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:42 am
by Panu
i got a question bout the xbox, why is the elite so good
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:46 am
by Ashikiheyun
_Panu_ wrote:i got a question bout the xbox, why is the elite so good
Cause it's black!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:10 am
by Reise
Put it this way, the second any console is released PC's automatically outclass them. All consoles are are customized and standardized PC's. Every bit of technology released in consoles these days most likely originated in a PC role. Therefore, as soon as consoles hit the market newer and better hardware is being made for PC's, while consoles are forced to stay at the same performance as the day they were released.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:41 am
by Nuklear
Silkroad wrote:Nuklear wrote:Reise wrote:Shadowman20818 wrote:In computing power alone no comp. can pass the potential power of the 360, of course if there were more than one computer, like if you used a rendering farm for games, then a comp has the potential to surpass a 360.
Ahahah what?
Seconded.
Comp>consoles always.
this is untrue when it comes to games as consoles can dedicate all of the computing power on the game ... not to mention the game is being run from a disc instead of the hard drive
also game producers are focusing on optimizing the game performance for consoles rather than computers ... this is also a big reason why consoles run games faster and sometimes with better graphics
i lol'd
Listen to Reise all.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:13 am
by Sharp324
Got in a argument with a noob on GTAMP about this saying the Xbox had better graphics than a PC, i asked what did he have a Dell with onboard and he shutup.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:59 pm
by DS^
to get a pc with the same graphics as a 360, u'll need to pay ~€1000/$1000
you only pay like €279 ( here in the Netherlands ) to get the core pack xbox.
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:06 pm
by [SD]Master_Wong
sorry to say this but comp>console for the main reason console is a non upgradable computer well internally externally you can do what you want, maybe the 360 might have been a good console better then most computers at the time of its release but now its not, pc games have always been more advance then console enough said?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:08 pm
by Silkroad
omg i don't even understand why ppl are comparing PC with xbox360 ... xbox 360 is purely a gaming console with some crap internet features added and some video and audio playback on the side ... i can't think of 1 person that actually uses their xbox or any other kind of gaming console for anything else other than gaming
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:10 pm
by XCaosX
i dont know much about xbox 360 but im sure that a pc is much better than it...ps3 is pretty good...but xbox dont have a chance(that what my brother say)
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:21 pm
by PR0METHEUS
Computers are used to CREATE console games. How anyone can say that consoles have more computing power or better graphics, etc, is beyond me.
Maybe the console is faster/better/has more graphics than YOUR computer.
*slowly backs away from this conversation*