Page 1 of 1
Noo what are they doing with CoD!
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:16 pm
by xzaz
I cant beleve it:
CoD: WWII
CoDII: WWII
CoDIII: WWII (Not even on PC)
CoDIV: Modern combat (Like BF2)
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=KNb4rbxYQ0Y&
I think it sucks, please make a good game for the PC, i want good fights with WWII, old school fights without rokets without tanks.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:21 pm
by dom
I think CoDIV is going to be the first one I buy.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:23 pm
by Stormprobe
its modern warfare not modern combat
And i think your wrong
reason it's better is becaus ethey made it more realistifc now
1. bullet's go through thin wall's
2. night vision
3.no exxagerating zoom
4. Actual number's that can be in batle field not like 3857036735754 people charging
5. you shoot your friend there dead xD
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:25 pm
by satman83
where have you been...they announced this like 4 months ago..either way
i think it will be good. I mean how many WW2 games can they really make
now?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:26 pm
by Cruor
To quote
GamePro...
GamePro wrote:Since the dawn of video games, publishers have released roughly 350 World War II-based titles. I'll spell it out for you: that's 350 WWII-themed games all centered around a conflict that lasted six years, which averages out to about 18 games per year during the modern era of gaming. The Allies won. Can't we be done with it? Or at least bring the number of games down to no more than a half-dozen per year? Sheesh. At least Resistance: Fall of Man played with a fun sci-fi alternate WWII timeline. But so many other games have resorted to reenacting increasingly obscure skirmishes in the WWII European front*. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare gives us some hope...though it still transgresses on another pet peeve of ours.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:28 pm
by xzaz
satman83 wrote:where have you been...they announced this like 4 months ago..either way
i think it will be good. I mean how many WW2 games can they really make
now?
I know but i just post it
Well still the shooter that is most played is a WWII based shooter:
http://www.xfire.com/ Cod2
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:31 pm
by xzaz
Cruor wrote:To quote
GamePro...
GamePro wrote:Since the dawn of video games, publishers have released roughly 350 World War II-based titles. I'll spell it out for you: that's 350 WWII-themed games all centered around a conflict that lasted six years, which averages out to about 18 games per year during the modern era of gaming. The Allies won. Can't we be done with it? Or at least bring the number of games down to no more than a half-dozen per year? Sheesh. At least Resistance: Fall of Man played with a fun sci-fi alternate WWII timeline. But so many other games have resorted to reenacting increasingly obscure skirmishes in the WWII European front*. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare gives us some hope...though it still transgresses on another pet peeve of ours.
And how many modern combat shooters comming out? Maby its because of me because i "like" (more interested in) the whole WWII history but a is there a bether WWII game then CoD2? Yhe cod3 but that aint for the pc.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:24 am
by Jstar1
COD:UO is the best
and i think COD4 will be like battlefield 2 with steroids
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:27 am
by CrimsonNuker
I *forbiddened* CoD:RtV for my psp, and those panzer tanks are so annoying >_>
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:18 am
by Wu
omg that movie is lookin' good!
So many good titles await us
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:20 am
by -Evan
WWII or Not, I love the CoD series.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:48 am
by Sylhana
Not really a fan of fps. But I might give CoD a go after seeing that vid
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:19 am
by TwelveEleven
Wolfet > CoD 2 tyvm
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:59 am
by xzaz
-Evan wrote:WWII or Not, I love the CoD series.
Yep good serie, but i want WWII thats why i play CoDX
