Page 1 of 1
Judge sues cleaners for 65 million over lost pants.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:26 pm
by Anh_Hung_Rom
Yahoo News
Can't you spell A-S-S-H-O-L-E? Farking guy is abusing the law to harass some immigrants over a god dam pair of pants. Un-facking-believable.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:29 pm
by rek
omg i wanna stab that guy and run away
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:31 pm
by Locketart
Lol they have my last name too! Chungs unite!
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:32 pm
by satman83
Locketart wrote:Lol they have my last name too! Chungs unite!
CHUNG FORCE GO
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:34 pm
by YangKang
Sad to see how people got. Sueing someone for $65m just for some shitty pants is pretty sad
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:34 pm
by MrJoey
Meh, worse stuff happens, saw at the bottom though this article which made me rofl...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070502/ap_ ... _s_channel
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:33 pm
by Waisha
Why is it so easy to sue the shit of someone for absolutely NOTHING in America?
Seriously, you could do that for a living. Just sue Mc Donalds for a late burger or w/e. Then after a year or so in court you have got 65 mils in your bank account. Simple as that.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:56 pm
by Locketart
Because you can and people are greedy selfish bastards. There's never forgive and forget, they always have to chase after them and try to squeeze every penny out of them.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:10 pm
by CrimsonNuker
Waisha wrote:Why is it so easy to sue the shit of someone for absolutely NOTHING in America?
Seriously, you could do that for a living. Just sue Mc Donalds for a late burger or w/e. Then after a year or so in court you have got 65 mils in your bank account. Simple as that.
Lol one time my friend pulled off a thread of hair and put it in his fries and he got a new one XD!
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:40 pm
by ThatOneMan3424
CrimsonNuker wrote:Waisha wrote:Why is it so easy to sue the shit of someone for absolutely NOTHING in America?
Seriously, you could do that for a living. Just sue Mc Donalds for a late burger or w/e. Then after a year or so in court you have got 65 mils in your bank account. Simple as that.
Lol one time my friend pulled off a thread of hair and put it in his fries and he got a new one XD!
my friend did that to but he ate like all the fries first then got a new one...he also did that with a Big Mac lol
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:20 pm
by woutR
Gotta be careful in America!
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:34 pm
by Reise
Just because you sue someone for 65mil doesn't mean you instantly have 65 million dollars. That crap is payed over years and years.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:35 pm
by Locketart
OMG Jay Leon made a joke about someone having to pay millions of dollars but at $400 a month LOL
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:37 pm
by Reise
Yeah, it still sucks bigtime though.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:50 pm
by BlackFox
He Is a really A-S-S-H-O-L-E Yea always they higher position think can do what they want becose they are Judge, politician ..But they are really a shit head when they do like this.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:51 pm
by [SD]Master_Wong
Waisha wrote:Why is it so easy to sue the shit of someone for absolutely NOTHING in America?
Seriously, you could do that for a living. Just sue Mc Donalds for a late burger or w/e. Then after a year or so in court you have got 65 mils in your bank account. Simple as that.
i complained my meal too soo long and i got like 3 burgers mcnuggets chips and a drink free
not too bad considering all i wanted was a burger, chips and a drink
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:16 pm
by Blackchocob0
I pamper people like that guy ever single day at my job.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:28 pm
by Vandango
Yanks will sue for anything lol...............
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 9:55 pm
by CrimsonNuker
I would kill the guy
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:40 am
by takolin
I doubt a judge can judge in a case in which he's involved with.
AKA the sueer (spelling?. I hate that verb and nouns from it).
It seems quite unbelievable.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 8:38 am
by [SD]Master_Wong
takolin wrote:I doubt a judge can judge in a case in which he's involved with.
AKA the sueer (spelling?. I hate that verb and nouns from it).
It seems quite unbelievable.
no he is repersenting himself not judging himself