Silkroad Online Forums

Should I see it in 2d or 3d?

/doesntactuallygiveafuckaboutyourreviewssodontwasteyourtimegivingthem.

Just saw it in 3d. It was a pretty good storyline... alot better than the "other" spiderman.

Saw it. Can't say it was better or worse than the original because they were so different. It's tough to adjust to a new Spiderman since I grew up with the other one but the movie was pretty damn good. I 100% recommend seeing it, the character development was pretty astounding. 3D was well done also, not too gimmicky like some movies.

Alright, so it's worth seeing it in 3d? Cool. Planning on seeing it Thursday night.

Tasdik wrote:Alright, so it's worth seeing it in 3d? Cool. Planning on seeing it Thursday night.

but you havent read the reviews they posted for you.


Personally dont care for 3D, I'll just be watching the 2D version.

Good movie - Saw it in 2D. I thought the good guy in this played Green Goblin in the other Spiderman movies, but not too sure. Found that pretty funny.

I don't get the hype behind these movies honestly.

Just see it in 2d.

Snazzi wrote:Good movie - Saw it in 2D. I thought the good guy in this played Green Goblin in the other Spiderman movies, but not too sure. Found that pretty funny.

Different actor

Tasdik wrote:Planning on seeing it Thursday night.

Was the Spider-Man movie good or bad? xD

like Andrew Garfield way more than Toby Maguire as Peter Parker.

John_Doe wrote:

Spoiler!

Movie was way too long. Guy that played Peter did not give off a Peter Parker vibe and whoever wrote the dialogue for Peter and Gwen Stacy should be fired, I thought I was watching Twilight every time they interacted. And since they were treading a lot of things that happened in the Sam Raimi Spider man where was my "With great power comes great responsibility...." Also man does he take his mask off a lot, I came to watch Spider man, not some dude do parkour in a Spider suit. Not worth the imax/3d admission. After just watching Avengers, this movie is just mediocre.

Just see it in 2d.

Do you even know what Peter Parker's character was suppose to be? Thew new movie does a much better job of capturing the sarcastic slap-stick comedy of Spiderman. The old one was way too emo and comedy-less to even be called spiderman.

Goseki wrote:

John_Doe wrote:

Spoiler!

Movie was way too long. Guy that played Peter did not give off a Peter Parker vibe and whoever wrote the dialogue for Peter and Gwen Stacy should be fired, I thought I was watching Twilight every time they interacted. And since they were treading a lot of things that happened in the Sam Raimi Spider man where was my "With great power comes great responsibility...." Also man does he take his mask off a lot, I came to watch Spider man, not some dude do parkour in a Spider suit. Not worth the imax/3d admission. After just watching Avengers, this movie is just mediocre.

Just see it in 2d.

Do you even know what Peter Parker's character was suppose to be? Thew new movie does a much better job of capturing the sarcastic slap-stick comedy of Spiderman. The old one was way too emo and comedy-less to even be called spiderman.

Pretty true. I've heard in the original comics and such he was much more sarcastic during fights and much more eccentric. I really love the original spiderman movies as well but if we're going to be picky about dialogue between the characters..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeN8bCiv ... ge#t=1796s

I still prefer the original, this one seemed way too corny.

Goseki wrote:

John_Doe wrote:

Spoiler!

Movie was way too long. Guy that played Peter did not give off a Peter Parker vibe and whoever wrote the dialogue for Peter and Gwen Stacy should be fired, I thought I was watching Twilight every time they interacted. And since they were treading a lot of things that happened in the Sam Raimi Spider man where was my "With great power comes great responsibility...." Also man does he take his mask off a lot, I came to watch Spider man, not some dude do parkour in a Spider suit. Not worth the imax/3d admission. After just watching Avengers, this movie is just mediocre.

Just see it in 2d.

Do you even know what Peter Parker's character was suppose to be? Thew new movie does a much better job of capturing the sarcastic slap-stick comedy of Spiderman. The old one was way too emo and comedy-less to even be called spiderman.

Don't get me wrong I liked him when he was in the Spider man suit cause they actually gave him stuff to say I had a problem with him when he was just Peter Parker.

After watching this one, I went back and watched the first one and the 2nd one. They are way too drawn out and emo as stated above..
I'm not especially picky when it comes to movies because I just love movies in general, but the reboot is better imo. I did like how the first one had his webbing as a part of his mutation though, the web shooters just seem too old school and keeps you wondering if he's going to run out at a crucial plot point like in the comics.

Saw it Saturday night, in 3d. Enjoyed it quite a bit. Much better then the original one IMO. *Wasn't a huge fan of Mary Jane in the first one, and loves Emma Stone*

spiderman 1 was good i liked that version
spiderman 2 was ok... things started going a bit off
spiderman 3 i thought was just terrible.

amazing spiderman was kinda nice with the new edgy feel.

the new spiderman actor played the slapstick happy go lucky spidey very well i thought but lacked the nerdy side of peter parker... peter parker is supposed to be a smart guy not just someone who gets lucky with knowledge.
i liked emma stones portrayal of gwen but again lacked the inner nerd in her characterization.

i loved the hints of technology and comic spiderman nods i thought they were really good but i was again disappointed with a few little things that they just did a bit differently from the comics and series, they needed some more scenes in peters bedroom at least but other then that...

i enjoyed it.

some parts are obviously ment to be viewed in 3d like when spidey is in first person view and things but other then that, not a great use of 3d...

Emma Stone is only good thing in movie.

_MvP_ wrote:Emma Stone is only good thing in movie.

Ooh that's bad because I don't even like her as it is.

.curve wrote:

_MvP_ wrote:Emma Stone is only good thing in movie.

Ooh that's bad because I don't even like her as it is.

Better dont go then... I dont know maybe I was expecting way to much, but I really didnt like the movie, couldnt wait for the end. And I watched in 3D, the only thing that was in 3D was subtitle...
But thats just my opinion.