Katy perry is trying to help her out which is nice.
But meh.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:39 pm
by Swindler
and not a single fuck was given that day.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:40 pm
by _Equal_
But meh.
exactly. When is the good music sung by talented people coming back?
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:20 pm
by Buddhist
Why is this happening to me?
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:30 pm
by Miguez
yellow
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:37 pm
by Shomari
_Equal_ wrote:
But meh.
exactly. When is the good music sung by talented people coming back?
the problem is you're only looking at mainstream music.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:49 pm
by Mirosuke
Thought it was Demi Lovato lol
mamomen! maaamoomeeeeennn
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:57 pm
by Azilius
Lots of money spent on digitally altering her voice..It's pretty amazing how well they masked it this time.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:07 pm
by Vaya
Is this song a massage for haters?
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:25 am
by Kirkaldi
Shomari wrote:
_Equal_ wrote:
But meh.
exactly. When is the good music sung by talented people coming back?
the problem is you're only looking at mainstream music.
YOU WIN!
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:23 am
by XemnasXD
Shomari wrote:
_Equal_ wrote:
But meh.
exactly. When is the good music sung by talented people coming back?
the problem is you're only looking at mainstream music.
>implying that no music that's reached mass audiences can be good
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:00 am
by Shomari
XemnasXD wrote:
Shomari wrote:
_Equal_ wrote:exactly. When is the good music sung by talented people coming back?
the problem is you're only looking at mainstream music.
>implying that no music that's reached mass audiences can be good
dunno if serious
You're only looking at = You're not seeing everything. Which means there is more than mainstream music - the majority of which sucks.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:04 am
by The Invisible
_Equal_ wrote:/ignore
Thought the same , clicked the post then saw Doron and a video .
Regret clicking in this thread... *Casually walks away*
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:05 am
by CrimsonNuker
We have a beiber crisis on our hands.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:50 am
by omier
Fortunately it's not as annoying as Friday.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:07 am
by paul855
/ignore
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:27 am
by _Clitrix_
paul855 wrote:/ignore
_Equal_ wrote:/ignore
wat.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:44 am
by takolin
It could be worse
/point Friday
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:02 am
by Toshiharu
XemnasXD wrote:>implying that no music that's reached mass audiences can be good
>implying you can greentext
Also making another video. lolwat
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:52 am
by satman83
HejsaN wrote:and not a single fuck was given that day.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:09 am
by Doron
satman83 wrote:
HejsaN wrote:and not a single fuck was given that FRIday.
Fix'd
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:00 pm
by inky
This stinks of auto-tune.
I'm pretty versatile when it comes to music - everything from classical to rock to rap. But there's just way too much garbage these days on the mainstream market to sort through.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:13 pm
by penfold1992
... i downloaded this song and its on repeat. anyone jelly?
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:43 pm
by paul855
9/10 people don't like "Friday". So why should I listen to this? I don't think her voice got better.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:16 pm
by _Equal_
Shomari wrote:the problem is you're only looking at mainstream music.
Define "mainstream" anyway.
I've been listening to Neon Trees, Cage the Elephant, Blink-182, Incubus, Death Cab For Cutie - on the alt stations. On BPM it's definitely more mainstream but stuff like Deadmau5 tends to be my favorite type.
The longer music evolves, the less "alternative" music there will be. And who can forget the Art of Noise, Yes, Kraftwerk, REM, Clash, Emerson, Lake & Palmer, Alan Parsons Project, Manfred Mann's Earth Band, ELO, etc? A lot of "alt" or "out there" or "indie" acts had so much effect that their stuff became mainstream.
I don't care much for rap although there are standouts in that field too, and slowcore is - well, too damn slow. Coldplay = go away.
A good jazz/fusion mix is somewhat hard to find in this area, that's why I have sat radio. I'm constantly exploring new channels to see what's out there. But if you mean the stuff that's on the radio is pretty much mainstream - I guess.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:42 pm
by *BlackFox
Well, not a huge improvement, but a step in the right direction.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:13 pm
by inky
_Equal_ wrote: Define "mainstream" anyway.
I've been listening to Neon Trees, Cage the Elephant, Blink-182, Incubus, Death Cab For Cutie - on the alt stations. On BPM it's definitely more mainstream but stuff like Deadmau5 tends to be my favorite type.
The longer music evolves, the less "alternative" music there will be. And who can forget the Art of Noise, Yes, Kraftwerk, REM, Clash, Emerson, Lake & Palmer, Alan Parsons Project, Manfred Mann's Earth Band, ELO, etc? A lot of "alt" or "out there" or "indie" acts had so much effect that their stuff became mainstream.
I don't care much for rap although there are standouts in that field too, and slowcore is - well, too damn slow. Coldplay = go away.
A good jazz/fusion mix is somewhat hard to find in this area, that's why I have sat radio. I'm constantly exploring new channels to see what's out there. But if you mean the stuff that's on the radio is pretty much mainstream - I guess.
I think people misunderstood what he meant, even after clarifying it. His statement is not the same as saying "mainstream music is garbage"; from what I understand, he's just implying that people need to look elsewhere - to broaden their sources - when it comes to finding new tunes. I have a few songs on my list that are/were on the "mainstream" group but that doesn't mean I like every song that plays on the radio these days (I actually find most of them to be annoying garbage).
These days, mainstream music usually means: auto-tune female singers, underage "tween" pop stars, or the typical (electronic+rap+auto-tune+repetitive catch phrase) that the mass majority can't seem to get enough of. I find it ridiculous that some people are able to listen to this crap for hours but hey, everyone's different.
Re: SHE'S B(L)ACK.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:17 pm
by _Equal_
Inky wrote:These days, mainstream music usually means: auto-tune female singers, underage "tween" pop stars, or the typical (electronic+rap+auto-tune+repetitive catch phrase) that the mass majority can't seem to get enough of. I find it ridiculous that some people are able to listen to this crap for hours but hey, everyone's different.
Makes total sense to me. Ugh, in that case I don't listen to much "mainstream" music