I came across this garbage today and as soon as I saw it I knew what I was going to get but I still saw it because is good to know sup right. So here is my question to you folks, what do you see wrong in this presentation ? To make it a little easier for us all I should probably say that paying attention to the economics of it is a great way to go about it.
I will be posting later the reason for this and why I labeled the content as such ( garbage ).
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:38 am
by Gaigemasta
lol
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:43 am
by Deadsolid
I'm really interested in your thoughts on this.
I really can't find anything wrong with the economics.
From what I've seen from TED before, they are typically pretty legitimate. So I am curious as well ^^
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:12 am
by McLovin1t
I mean, I wouldn't be so quick to doubt Ted, considering the critic over here also believes terrorists weren't involved in 9/11.
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:28 am
by Deadsolid
McLovin1t wrote:I mean, I wouldn't be so quick to doubt Ted, considering the critic over here also believes terrorists weren't involved in 9/11.
Let's not bash him before he has said anything.
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:40 am
by Love
Deadsolid wrote:
McLovin1t wrote:I mean, I wouldn't be so quick to doubt Ted, considering the critic over here also believes terrorists weren't involved in 9/11.
Let's not bash him before he has said anything.
I could care less about his ignorance and assumptions about myself and honestly if no1 sees anything wrong with this ( fairly simple task ) I won't be saying anything at all, it would most likely mean any time spent here would be wasted, thanks btw.
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:06 am
by /Pi
Love wrote:I came across this garbage today and as soon as I saw it I knew what I was going to get but I still saw it because is good to know sup right. So here is my question to you folks, what do you see wrong in this presentation ? To make it a little easier for us all I should probably say that paying attention to the economics of it is a great way to go about it.
Here's a checklist:
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:53 am
by Phenom_
Love wrote:
Deadsolid wrote:
McLovin1t wrote:I mean, I wouldn't be so quick to doubt Ted, considering the critic over here also believes terrorists weren't involved in 9/11.
Let's not bash him before he has said anything.
I could care less about his ignorance and assumptions about myself and honestly if no1 sees anything wrong with this ( fairly simple task ) I won't be saying anything at all, it would most likely mean any time spent here would be wasted, thanks btw.
Well damn, too bad I'm such a simple minded idiot who cant comprehend your complex theories
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:07 am
by Ganja
Is it because he's not wearing a tie?
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:14 am
by Love
^ ^
Me knowing something you don't doesn't make me any smarter or you more stupid, simply means you haven't had the opportunity to learn it. Having said that I won't pretend to have the ability to teach you a number of things in a single or even multiple posts, this just to have a conversation that won't exactly be productive as what I would be willing to argue for me is productive with this kind of post is to have a somewhat substantial number of people agree that x idea is found to be true.
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:30 am
by Deadsolid
I am honestly interested in hearing what you have to say.
Frankly, I'm intrigued that there is anything wrong with it. I don't want to start guessing. Fill us in or have it locked.
Re: so TED ...
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:46 pm
by Skyve
Thats like saying " Yo guyz I have a secret... but I won't tell you ".