Page 1 of 1

IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 10:55 pm
by TOloseGT
i vote this day to be draw sm-count day :rant:

i'll start:

Image

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 10:58 pm
by Azilius
Image

The vacuum cleaner IMO

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 11:03 pm
by Snazzi
:love: the sound that the vaccuum makes :) Makes me lol every time I hear it.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 4:15 am
by Mirosuke
:? :? :?

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 4:32 am
by Love
I am taking it a bit more personal than this.

Some1 religious closing a thread that criticizes religion with valid unchallenged points is unacceptable.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 8:53 am
by asusi
I hope that was you being sarcastic :wink:

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:03 am
by Love
No, that was me being very serious.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:12 am
by asusi
Love wrote:No, that was me being very serious.

Image

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:22 am
by Love
You should watch what you say, you and your lack of basic understanding of human rights are the ones not wanted in any sort of fair and healthy society. I don't remember the last argument you made that justified the oppression of human beings to favor any given group, I'll let you know in advance there is no such thing and I intend to take a more serious tone with this tomorrow, this is no longer fun and games.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:20 am
by MrJoey
I'd just like to say about this and the topic it's in response to:

Lol, religion.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:39 am
by VforVendetta
I also agree with Love, SM-Count posted about how he doesnt support human rights and closed the thread because it didnt go with his way of thinking.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:44 am
by 0l3n
I might have missed something but where did he state that he doesnt support human rights?

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:54 am
by VforVendetta
0l3n wrote:I might have missed something but where did he state that he doesnt support human rights?


I may have exaggerated and read into it a bit more than needed but, giving a religious person the power to close a thread when things aren't going in their direciton of thinking is a bit too much. The thread wasn't even getting out of hand, because if we had non stop trolling, name calling and general **** I would agree on the thread being closed. Other than the fact it wasn't Draw Muhammad Day any longer doesn't mean that a good discussion should just be closed on one persons accord.

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 12:03 pm
by dom
no

Re: IN DEFIANCE OF SM-COUNT

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 2:25 pm
by SM-Count
Um... what? I'm agnostic, don't know where you read I was religious (or are we assuming again?). It seems you guys still don't get it, I'm for speaking out against oppression and death threats, I'm against doing so in an idiotic impractical manner. But ofc you guys don't deal with the practicality point instead jumping on the assumption I'm religious(as shown by the hyperbole that I'm against human rights lol) and that everyone opposed to you is religious, not just practical. Then there's the blatant unprovoked flaming and flame baiting.(this thread is a good example) That alone warrants a close, just clearing up the fact that I am indeed, not religious :O