Reise wrote:XemnasXD wrote: do you ever see anything like that?
I saw plenty of objects that could be mistaken for weapons.
People wouldn't report on it like this if we just up and said "Yeah, they were unarmed, people are being punished for it, our bad." There is a lot of info we don't have and people are exploiting that.
i meant do you ever see any video where the military shoots up a group of people and then goes "My bad, got it wrong this time." You hardly ever hear of them admitting any wrong doing unless an investigation is initiated because someone else wants answers.
I don't disagree, those could be mistaken for weapons but just as easily as you see plenty of objects that could be mistaken for weapons you're also admitting that lots of things look like weapons, and even in war that has never been cause to suddenly open fire or civilian casualties would be alot higher than they are (and they're already extremely high on the Iraqis side in the war).
Also if you're going to blame people for exploiting the lack of information than blame the army for not releasing it without it being forced out of them, then lying about it, then trying to cover it up. If you take the video and the facts gathered for what it is then no one is being exploited anyway, its only when people stop thinking and start acting like a bunch of moronic hippies that this information even appears one-sided. In any case that's not the fault of Wiki-Leaks who just provided the cold unbiased facts of the situation...
@alot of people...also why do people find peeking around corners in a warzone to be suspicious. If you were there and obviously the city was in some kind of state of combat would you walk around corners without looking first?
@heroo the WTC attack had alot to do with our invasion of Iraq. It gathered support and generally mislead the people and misdirected attention. The whole time we were invading Iraq it was called
"The War on Terror" when as we all know and realized after we stopped raging about the WTC had nothing to do with Iraq at all, it was Afghanistan. Then you start seeing popularity for the war fall and everyone starts talking about how we never should've been there in the first place when years early everyone was all gung-ho for it. So did WTC actually have anything to do with Iraq, no. Did it end up being the rallying call for the invasion of Iraq, yes. But still Jstar never does do well in topics like these...then again you're exactly proving his better here either...
>>
