Silkroad Online Forums

Title says. Anyone got an answer?

cause its not christian...

cause the twilight guy would steal all the girls and we'd have no1 left and then we die and he reproduces all the new babies and the world consist only out of sparkly childeren

Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>
Ever seen someone who has been truely in love with two people at the same time ?
No one really has the need for it.
If there would be a load of cases where people would feel the need for it, there's a good chance it'dd be legalized (like gay marriage), but that obiously wont be the case

Cuz humans are complicated. You can't truly love two people and do things for both of them, there is bound to be something you do for one that will upset the other.

I don't think it has anything to do with Christianity. Law aside, there aren't very many people I've ever met besides one polyamorist who seemed to be able to keep a relationship in that fashion. The law was just so the gov't got to regulate it for tax purposes.

I've noticed that Silo seems to ask questions that provoke - whether that is genuine discussion or if it degenerates into namecalling.

edit: spelling

There's also tax advantages, which is why it's forbidden. (Believe I saw that on an episode of Boston Legal, great show btw)

It isn't a christian thing. Monogamy arises from the idea of equal rights for men and women and the desire for a simple and organized family structure. In America, the law was created as a response to the Mormon church.

Well when the Mormons moved up to the north west they wanted to ratify their state into the union. Part of the compromise was that they would drop the practice of polygamy.
This all goes back to colonization and Christianity.

There are still people that practice it though.
I saw a show on Nat Geo yesterday where a guy in Canada had 15 wives and about 60+ kids!

LillDev!l wrote:Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>
Ever seen someone who has been truely in love with two people at the same time ?
No one really has the need for it.
If there would be a load of cases where people would feel the need for it, there's a good chance it'dd be legalized (like gay marriage), but that obiously wont be the case

In ancient chinese time, it worked like that. And it worked fine for a long time until whoever/whatever changed it

_Equal_ wrote:I've noticed that Silo seems to ask questions that provoke - whether that is genuine discussion or if it degenerates into namecalling.

Because it's not about the question, but about mature people and retarded people can't coexist in the same place.

oh gawd silo, you troll.

NuclearSilo wrote:

LillDev!l wrote:Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>
Ever seen someone who has been truely in love with two people at the same time ?
No one really has the need for it.
If there would be a load of cases where people would feel the need for it, there's a good chance it'dd be legalized (like gay marriage), but that obiously wont be the case

In ancient chinese time, it worked like that. And it worked fine for a long time until whoever/whatever changed it

_Equal_ wrote:I've noticed that Silo seems to ask questions that provoke - whether that is genuine discussion or if it degenerates into namecalling.

Because it's not about the question, but about mature people and retarded people can't coexist in the same place.

So why are you here again?

A: If Silo is mature, and the "rest" of us are retarded, then C
B: If Silo is retarded and the "rest" of us are mature, then C

C: "mature people and retarded people can't coexist in the same place."

I'm just sayin'...I think your "logic" is flawed. If mature and retarded people couldn't coexist, how did we get Congress or politicians?

1 nagging wife is enough... having two is hell on earth.

XemnasXD wrote:cause its not christian...

This is a misunderstanding. The only time this is advised against in the bible is for the head of an ecclesia. There is nothing wrong with polygamy. It is actually stated that the end of our age will be made evident by the forbidding of marriage. This is believed to refer to polygamous marriages. Marriage is likened to a contract, or covenant. In as much as Jesus will have a polygamous marriage of the nations of the earth, it is also allowed for a man to be in a polygamous relationship with women.

The thought that marriage is meant to be monogamous is as false and non-biblical as many other teachings in modern christianity.

why would u want to get married in the first place? free union ftw lolz.

LillDev!l wrote:Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>

_Equal_ wrote:Cuz humans are complicated. You can't truly love two people and do things for both of them, there is bound to be something you do for one that will upset the other.

I don't think it has anything to do with Christianity.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. The majority of the worlds societies encourage or accept polygamous relations. It is because of religious and societal pressures that more industrialized nations forbid polygamy.

CeLL wrote:This is a misunderstanding. The only time this is advised against in the bible is for the head of an ecclesia.

The catholic church strictly forbids polygamy.

because here in America it has always been that way.

EvGa wrote:

CeLL wrote:This is a misunderstanding. The only time this is advised against in the bible is for the head of an ecclesia.

The catholic church strictly forbids polygamy.

so?

LillDev!l wrote:Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>
Ever seen someone who has been truely in love with two people at the same time ?
No one really has the need for it.
If there would be a load of cases where people would feel the need for it, there's a good chance it'dd be legalized (like gay marriage), but that obiously wont be the case

Yes.

As for the reason why you cant have two wives. It's not in the law in every country but in the other countries i would guess they think its unethical and it says so in the bible and many countries are majority of Christians.

Because you touch yourself at night.

Mindy wrote:

LillDev!l wrote:Cause overall humans dont 'work' like that ?>.>
Ever seen someone who has been truely in love with two people at the same time ?
No one really has the need for it.
If there would be a load of cases where people would feel the need for it, there's a good chance it'dd be legalized (like gay marriage), but that obiously wont be the case

Yes.

As for the reason why you cant have two wives. It's not in the law in every country but in the other countries i would guess they think its unethical and it says so in the bible and many countries are majority of Christians.

where?

_Equal_ wrote:So why are you here again?

A: If Silo is mature, and the "rest" of us are retarded, then C
B: If Silo is retarded and the "rest" of us are mature, then C

C: "mature people and retarded people can't coexist in the same place."

I'm just sayin'...I think your "logic" is flawed. If mature and retarded people couldn't coexist, how did we get Congress or politicians?

I'm here to ask a question. Whoever turns this into a flame war is not under my control.
How do you think a flame war is started anyway? If it's not because of some retards start the name calling and begin the "you sir are idiot, I am right, you are wrong" ?

Tsume wrote:Because you touch yourself at night.

An example of off-topic response with the intention of derailing the topic.

evilpeta wrote:why would u want to get married in the first place? free union ftw lolz.

To live together?
I'm not asking about the purpose of marrying, but why the government forbid such and such laws. Of course they don't give a shit how many girls you got in your life and if you live with them like husband and wife or not. For example, what's the point of forcing people to divorce the previous marriage before marrying a new one?

NuclearSilo wrote:Why does the law forbid one marrying 2 people?

Well, Isn't that good? lulz

*BlackFox wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:Why does the law forbid one marrying 2 people?

Well, Isn't that good? lulz

Why?

CeLL wrote:

EvGa wrote:

CeLL wrote:This is a misunderstanding. The only time this is advised against in the bible is for the head of an ecclesia.

The catholic church strictly forbids polygamy.

so?

Just say'in. Many Christian faiths are against polygamist relations.

EvGa wrote:

CeLL wrote:

EvGa wrote:
The catholic church strictly forbids polygamy.

so?

Just say'in. Many Christian faiths are against polygamist relations.

yes and many of them are against music, and dancing, and abortion, and taking their children to a doctor. none of these objections are advocated by scripture. and neither is forced monogamy.

i never knew there was an actual law against having 2 spouses at the same time

CeLL wrote:

EvGa wrote:Just say'in. Many Christian faiths are against polygamist relations.

yes and many of them are against music, and dancing, and abortion, and taking their children to a doctor. none of objections are advocated by scripture. and neither is forced monogamy.

Yep, the monogamist part just got pushed through as a law. I'm not arguing for/against if it is advocated in scripture, but certain religious doctrines have played a role in pressuring these laws into place.

Not saying it is the sole reason, just one of the reasons.

i understand, i just want to make clear that there is a difference in what men of a "faith" say and what scripture says.

CeLL wrote:i understand, i just want to make clear that there is a difference in what men of a "faith" say and what scripture says.

Sadly it is men of "faith" that do most of the decision making.

Its not christian dammit!