Page 1 of 2

Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:20 am
by John_Doe
Did anyone watch the Grammys, what did you guys think? I personally thought it was crap, only the MJ tribute was decent.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:45 pm
by ApocalypticDeath
They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:58 pm
by Da_Realest
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

I don't see any other singer who sings as well as she does and puts so much effort into their craft as she does. Her songs also connect with women extremely well. She earned those awards.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:10 pm
by heroo
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated


she is best female singer the world. her voice is just incredible.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:23 pm
by cpinney
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

i actually agree with this.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:29 pm
by woutR
Music is so arbitrary, I just won't bother arguing if it was deserved or not.
If a band/singer that I like gets a grammy, great. If they don't, care. It won't change the music I listen to.

Maybe I should transfer this philosophy to the oscars, but somehow I do get genuinely upset when bad movies get oscars.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:10 pm
by Melez
cpinney wrote:
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

i actually agree with this.


Indeed. And besides, having a grammy doesn't mean you're being critically favored. Come to think of it, it means nothing imo.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:33 pm
by TheDrop
Didn't get to watch it since Fox did't show it and my tv has f*ck all channels :(

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:55 pm
by Smi!ezZ
The performances between nominations get worse and worse each year. I think its because people are using synthesizers and other voice-over techno programs so much in their songs now they cant reproduce them live.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:05 pm
by Tasdik
Beyonce annoys me for whatever reason. Perhaps it's because I'm not a single lady.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:31 am
by Achilles990
Green day who what? no sersly out of 3 best bands they gave to them wow sersly Im not even going bother watching next year, hello Oscars cant wait!!


But at end I'm happy, 1 out of the 2 grammy AC/DC were nominated they won one and im proude of them and very happy to be there fan! all Hail Angus!!

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:27 am
by asusi
cpinney wrote:
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

i actually agree with this.

NO. she is most famous singer in world, not the best. :wink: her daddy made her so big, well no wonder IMO

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:29 am
by Ganja
asusi wrote:
cpinney wrote:
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

i actually agree with this.

NO. she is most famous singer in world, not the best. :wink: her daddy made her so big, well no wonder IMO


Yeah, I was about to say this too. Who else could deserve this award? We all saw what happened when they tried to give an award to Talyor Swift.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:56 am
by Fury
I wonder if Kanye had to be restrained when taylor swift received her award...

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:48 am
by XemnasXD
lolgrammys...

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:51 am
by Goseki
Thing is though, Beyonce does have an insane range for her voice. Not many people can go as low or as high as her while still sounding good.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:29 am
by asusi
Goseki wrote:Thing is though, Beyonce does have an insane range for her voice. Not many people can go as low or as high as her while still sounding good.


Computers getting those days better and better :wink:
But i do agree she can sing, but she is overrated.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:52 am
by Majorharper
In all honesty who the fuck cares about grammy's whats the point? all i see is people bitching about anything that happens, y'all think beyonce is overrated bla bla bla, when someone else gets an award you (and others) bitch even more!!! WHAT THE HECK?? Never watched grammy's never will, I just think its some pointless meaningless crap

It's not going to make you listen more / less to any singer that gets an award, since your all complaining she got too many awards so why the heck should they get grammy's?

A nice hand shake and a pat on the back should be good enough.

Think about it economicly wise too... Who is paying for all that ceremony crap? Artists already have enough fame with their songs, I think this is just a money wasting scheme and should be removed tbh.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:42 pm
by Goseki
asusi wrote:
Goseki wrote:Thing is though, Beyonce does have an insane range for her voice. Not many people can go as low or as high as her while still sounding good.


Computers getting those days better and better :wink:
But i do agree she can sing, but she is overrated.


I much prefer people that can sing WITHOUT auto-tuning. Makes it worthwhile showing up to their concerts. Plus for me, it shows musical talents. Crap these days where any video on the web can be turned into a song via autotune is shit.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:59 pm
by magisuns
yah it was pretty decent. gaga's OP was great and elton only made it better. pink was beyond awesome... and thats all i thought was good
for the bad we have... green day having a performance, taylor winning alot, beyonce's obvious weave was obvious, black eyed peas is crap in general, a 3d moment of boredom, some band no one has ever heard of performing, jamie foxx lipsyncing, t-pain serenadeing that guitar person with his hair, the little cRapper performance with lol censoring even worse than black eyed peas

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:06 pm
by CeLL
beyonce is over rated, she just playing the game well.

and as for the greenday bash, stfu. they have been at it for a very very long time and are an excellent group.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:18 pm
by antics
king of leon suck
so do most of those rock bands on there

Re: Grammys

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:29 pm
by William-CL
Da_Realest wrote:
ApocalypticDeath wrote:They gave Beyonce way too many awards she is overrated

I don't see any other singer who sings as well as she does and puts so much effort into their craft as she does. Her songs also connect with women extremely well. She earned those awards.

Yea if she didn't deserve them she wouldn't have got them. There shouldn't be a limit to someones success.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:22 am
by Smi!ezZ
Master_of_Puppets wrote:In all honesty who the fuck cares about grammy's whats the point? all i see is people bitching about anything that happens, y'all think beyonce is overrated bla bla bla, when someone else gets an award you (and others) bitch even more!!! WHAT THE HECK?? Never watched grammy's never will, I just think its some pointless meaningless crap

It's not going to make you listen more / less to any singer that gets an award, since your all complaining she got too many awards so why the heck should they get grammy's?

A nice hand shake and a pat on the back should be good enough.

Think about it economicly wise too... Who is paying for all that ceremony crap? Artists already have enough fame with their songs, I think this is just a money wasting scheme and should be removed tbh.

Yes you should never be rewarded for excellence in your field of profession. That is just a waste of time and money.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:49 am
by Majorharper
Smi!ezZ wrote:
Master_of_Puppets wrote:In all honesty who the fuck cares about grammy's whats the point? all i see is people bitching about anything that happens, y'all think beyonce is overrated bla bla bla, when someone else gets an award you (and others) bitch even more!!! WHAT THE HECK?? Never watched grammy's never will, I just think its some pointless meaningless crap

It's not going to make you listen more / less to any singer that gets an award, since your all complaining she got too many awards so why the heck should they get grammy's?

A nice hand shake and a pat on the back should be good enough.

Think about it economicly wise too... Who is paying for all that ceremony crap? Artists already have enough fame with their songs, I think this is just a money wasting scheme and should be removed tbh.

Yes you should never be rewarded for excellence in your field of profession. That is just a waste of time and money.


They already are being rewarded by being on the no. 1 hit list of radios and stuff

Tell me any other field of proffesion that you get your own idk 1 - 2hr show of medals and trophies?

I'll take for example my dad, been working as a pilot for what 25+ some what years? no one has given him a trophy

Do lawyers get trophies for winning cases? Nope

Do teachers get medals for teaching nope

Do heart surgeons get a trophy for not killing the patient and making him live? nope

Do game programmers get a trophy for creating an amazing game? nope

I think i proved my point there...

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:14 am
by ApocalypticDeath
Fury wrote:I wonder if Kanye had to be restrained when taylor swift received her award...


lol Kanye and Beyonce have a song and music video which revolves around his ego and how it makes Beyonce horny

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:53 am
by TheDrop
Master_of_Puppets wrote:In all honesty who the fuck cares about grammy's whats the point? all i see is people bitching about anything that happens, y'all think beyonce is overrated bla bla bla, when someone else gets an award you (and others) bitch even more!!! WHAT THE HECK?? Never watched grammy's never will, I just think its some pointless meaningless crap

It's not going to make you listen more / less to any singer that gets an award, since your all complaining she got too many awards so why the heck should they get grammy's?

A nice hand shake and a pat on the back should be good enough.

Think about it economicly wise too... Who is paying for all that ceremony crap? Artists already have enough fame with their songs, I think this is just a money wasting scheme and should be removed tbh.

QQ

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:52 am
by [SD]Master_Wong
woutR wrote:Music is so arbitrary, I just won't bother arguing if it was deserved or not.
If a band/singer that I like gets a grammy, great. If they don't, care. It won't change the music I listen to.

Maybe I should transfer this philosophy to the oscars, but somehow I do get genuinely upset when bad movies get oscars.


with movies its not so much the movie that gets it more one part of it such as animation or sound some bad movies do contain good aspects god forbid me for saying this transformers 2 could earn an oscar for animation

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:52 am
by Blindfire
Master_of_Puppets wrote:
Do game programmers get a trophy for creating an amazing game? nope

I think i proved my point there...



Game of the year award, E3 awards, the Spike video game awards show, etc.

Re: Grammys

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:02 am
by Skyve
Fury wrote:I wonder if Kanye had to be restrained when taylor swift received her award...

I think he was. Lil Wayne perfommed his song "Forever" which features Kanye West,Eminem and Drake. Funny thing is that Eminem and Drake where there,but Kanye wasn't. :roll: