Silkroad Online Forums

Who do you think is going to win it?

Colts.

But I'm rooting for the Saints the whole way. = )

Saints 35
Colts 24

colts. we got guns bitch.

probably the colts, but id rather see new orleans win in their first super bowl appearance.

Colts, but not cause I like them. NO was just too weak against the Vikings...

reggie bush

I know absolutely nothing about american football, but I'd still like to venture a guess: I go for Colts!

Vikings

Hell I'm not that into football but even I watched the game!
Peterson was a god damn fore throughout the whole game like a mate of mine says.
I could've sworn that Favre got hurt though! He got tackled pretty rough and he was limping.

I think that the Saints can beat the colts, with Favre and Peterson I'm not sure, I'm thinking the Vikings could have done better against the colts.
This is a hard one, But I'mma have to go with the Colts because of Manning.
But Brees didn't do that bad throughout the game, he did have to do extra work than a quarterback should, so did Favre.
It was a back and forth game !

Yes, Saints could of won in regulation. They simply couldnt convert turnovers into points, and i'd say if they want to win the superbowl they need to score with the oppurtunities given

Easy win for the Colts!!! Go Colts Go Manning

Saints are so bad, sooo bad.

Colts. If you disagree, you probably don't watch football.

Heosphoros wrote:Colts. If you disagree, you probably don't watch football.

Living on a prayer.

Peyton manning is the best ever
imagine if he had WRs outside of reggie wayne, the guy is a stud.

Peterson has the potential to be one of the greatest running backs ever, if only he'd learn to hang onto the damn ball. You'd think during college he would've learned how to, apparently not.

*CJ love*

Tasdik wrote:Peterson has the potential to be one of the greatest running backs ever, if only he'd learn to hang onto the damn ball. You'd think during college he would've learned how to, apparently not.

*CJ love*

He only played 1 year in college, his freshman year and would've won the Heisman if it wasnt for Matt Leinart.
He was plagued by injuries, and went onto the draft after missing an entire year due to a broken collarbone.
Everyone knows he fumbles, he's like Tiki barber, it took Tiki 8 years to learn not to fumble, and that's basically a RB's entire life span in the nfl.

Saints should have lost to Minnesota by like 14.

So theres no chance they're stopping peyton.

peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials

Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials

Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.

dom wrote:Vikings

this.

and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)

in short: **** you nfc, get good.

McLovin1t wrote:

Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials

Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.

the rock was a good wrestler.

McLovin1t wrote:

Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials

Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.

hahahahaha
Good one!

Who Dat?

iSinnnn wrote:

dom wrote:Vikings

this.

and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)

in short: **** you nfc, get good.

how are the cardinals and saints boring teams?

not to mention last years Superbowl was one of the best in recent memory.

cpinney wrote:

iSinnnn wrote:

dom wrote:Vikings

this.

and colts will win, probably by two or more possessions. it seems like every year recently there's a boring team i don't want to see in the super bowl (seahawks, bears, cardinals, saints)

in short: **** you nfc, get good.

how are the cardinals and saints boring teams?

not to mention last years Superbowl was one of the best in recent memory.

by boring i meant that the players themselves were boring, referring more towards their careers/current legacy than playstyle. going into it, the only "superstar" was warner, fitzgerald broke out in the playoffs, and has always been great but he really got recognized in that playoff run.
the defense? what defense?

i could have really cared less about any of that cardinals roster getting to the super bowl let alone winning one. admittedly the game was pretty good, or maybe it just seemed that way because.. bears.. seahawks.. hell even the panthers.

as for the saints, i'd rather see manning tack another ring onto his hall of fame resume then watch a team that arguably is very lucky to be there in the first place win it all.
it's going to be painful to watch regardless, i was looking forward to manning's legacy vs brett's last shot.

you shouldnt fumble "all day" if you want to think like that

CeLL wrote:

McLovin1t wrote:

Zypher wrote:peyton isnt good at football, he should stick to making commercials

Kinda like how Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson wasn't a great wrestler, but the best actor we've ever seen.
OR
Kinda like Arnold Schwarzanegger (I think), not the best actor, but the best governor we've ever seen.

the rock was a good wrestler.

ya mclovin is confused as fucc