Silkroad Online Forums

What would you remove? And why?
(you got to say things in general, like you can say "i want to remove 'human' but you can't say i want to remove 'Tom Cruise')

But also consider the following definition of existence: smt exists if only its opposite exists. For example, if you remove "fear", you also have to remove "courage" as well.

In case you don't know what to remove, say what do you want to add to the world (you might consider to add its opposite as well)

As for the 2nd question "why", you also need to explain why you don't want its opposite to exist


I repeat: You need to explain WHY? With it AND without it!
I repeat: You need to explain WHY? With it AND without it!
I repeat: You need to explain WHY? With it AND without it!
Repeated 3 times, if you still don't remember, don't even think about replying

I would remove rights and their opposite, duties.

Mosquitoes

I hate them, ESP. since I live in FL.. They bite and its itchy and annoying :/

Humidity too
( of course not possible, or there would be no earth, but i hate it )

I dont like when ppl hate each other so i would remove it but i'd have to remove love too and I dont want that. So I would remove...hmm...Dont really know but maybe the money. It doesn't make any sense.

ofy1993 wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:But also consider the following definition of existence: smt exists if only its opposite exists.

So this chair exists because the opposite of a chair exists? O_o. Your logic makes no sense.

Agreed.

Corruption. And it doesn't need an explanation.
And +1 to Ofy.

Religion.

ofy1993 wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:But also consider the following definition of existence: smt exists if only its opposite exists.

So this chair exists because the opposite of a chair exists? O_o. Your logic makes no sense.

well, because you went into details. I mentioned you got to talk in general.
chair = material/objects/elements
table = material/objects/elements
There's probably an opposite of chair but we just don't know it yet, or we don't have a word for it. But I believe this definition is somehow right.

vietxboy911 wrote:Mosquitoes

I hate them, ESP. since I live in FL.. They bite and its itchy and annoying :/

Humidity too
( of course not possible, or there would be no earth, but i hate it )

Same as above, mosquitos = animal

Thomas42 wrote:I would remove rights and their opposite, duties.

A world without rights and duties will be getting worsts. You give birth to a baby, you abandoned it, doesn't seems fine.
Children have the rights to go to school. Remove it, doesn't seems fine at all.

Sacrosanctus wrote:I dont like when ppl hate each other so i would remove it but i'd have to remove love too and I dont want that. So I would remove...hmm...Dont really know but maybe the money. It doesn't make any sense.

I love how ppl try to remove good things from the world. Try another thing.

~Mark~ wrote:Corruption. And it doesn't need an explanation.
And +1 to Ofy.

It could work. Without incorruption, the world doesn't have a big change. You gain what you work for.
But because of corruption, it helps sometime when you need someone to help you smt...

Snickers wrote:Religion.

Euh, why?

"Violence"
The world would be so much better and cheerful.
Wouldn't it be nice?.. xD

Well if chair doesnt exist, then i guess a kind of fatigue wouldn't exist o_0

if you mean that with opposite, but well, the chairs not only to sit in i guess lol

*BlackFox wrote:"Violence"
The world would be so much better and cheerful.
Wouldn't it be nice?.. xD

and the word associated with "no violence", why it's ok to remove it?

Religion, serves no use and causes massive conflict

So according to silo, if you remove religion, you are removing athesism too?
lol wut

oh wait, before we turn this thread into anothing religion/science discussion, i'll say it shorts.

Religion teaches ppl how to be a good person, why to be a good person, what's the benefit to be a good person (at least mentally), etc...

You might as well search in Google for the benefits of "religion"

UnbeatableDevil wrote:So according to silo, if you remove religion, you are removing athesism too?
lol wut

atheism = no religion
try to give me a definition of atheism without using the words "god", "religion"...?

Twilight.

The world is perfect.

The Internet

Whores.

Reise wrote:Twilight.

you can't use proper noun and going in specific detail
But still, without Twilight, the main male actor can't get famous
So it's not good for him and it gives no major change to the world

DrWicked wrote:The world is perfect.

Im sure you still hate smt in your life

Smi!ezZ wrote:The Internet

Damn, no SRO and SRF. I got a life now, yay

....

You need to explain WHY? With it AND without it!

I'd remove everything. And of course its opposite, nothing.
Why? Because it'd be fun to watch the world experience the BSOD.

what means smt?

Kind of a toss up between diseases 'n hate

Nothing really good comes out of diseases....hell, it's in the name itself: dis-ease ... living with one myself, you're kinda stock piled with this, for a lack of a better word, pain for the rest of your life....maybe I'm soft, but eh, never really liked to see anyone in pain. (why not just say pain? ...eh, body needs it ...lol).

Hate...eh. Hate bridges bringing people together. It can bring about violence, narrow mindedness, 'n some other unneeded, somewhat negative things I'm too tired to get into...

Mirosuke wrote:what means smt?

Means "something", I'm guessing.

Reise wrote:Twilight.

I think we can all agree on this. And Silo your "rules" in this thread are terrible lol.

NuclearSilo wrote:

Reise wrote:Twilight.

you can't use proper noun and going in specific detail
But still, without Twilight, the main male actor can't get famous
So it's not good for him and it gives no major change to the world

You don't know how wrong you are.

Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

SwordCloud wrote:Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

simply add the word "not/no" to the word you remove, you'll understand
live - not live (dead)
dead - not dead (live)
peace - no peace (war, violence, etc...)

you remove life and death, you are neither living or dying

*looks around*

Huh?

NuclearSilo wrote:

SwordCloud wrote:Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

simply add the word "not/no" to the word you remove, you'll understand
live - not live (dead)
dead - not dead (live)
peace - no peace (war, violence, etc...)

you remove life and death, you are neither living or dying

Then if you don't live and you're not dead what are you?
This have no sense for me,you can't remove the both things,could you tell me how this can have a sense?

NuclearSilo wrote:

SwordCloud wrote:Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

simply add the word "not/no" to the word you remove, you'll understand
live - not live (dead)
dead - not dead (live)
peace - no peace (war, violence, etc...)

you remove life and death, you are neither living or dying

So with your logic your saying theres an anti- universe?

Squirt wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:

SwordCloud wrote:Nuclear and his logics . . .

Removing something and his opposite?If you remove Violence You can't remove the peace,
IF you remove the peace you can't remove the violence,if you remove life and dead,then we lives or we are all deads?I will never undertand your logic because you don't think the same way as many of member including me think.

simply add the word "not/no" to the word you remove, you'll understand
live - not live (dead)
dead - not dead (live)
peace - no peace (war, violence, etc...)

you remove life and death, you are neither living or dying

So with your logic your saying theres an anti- universe?

Everyone knows about the Anti-verse.